Michael Jennings wrote:
On Thursday, 31 July 2003, at 03:04:05 (+0300),
Onur Kucuk wrote:
What do you think of checking /etc/*release to find out what distro
it is and define the dirs "per distro" in the script ?
Guess info about a few of the main distros would be enough, and
leave configurable $K
On Thursday, 31 July 2003, at 03:04:05 (+0300),
Onur Kucuk wrote:
> What do you think of checking /etc/*release to find out what distro
> it is and define the dirs "per distro" in the script ?
>
> Guess info about a few of the main distros would be enough, and
> leave configurable $KDEAPPLNKDIR $
Hello,
What do you think of checking /etc/*release to find out what distro
it is and define the dirs "per distro" in the script ?
Guess info about a few of the main distros would be enough, and leave
configurable $KDEAPPLNKDIR $GNOMEAPPLNKDIR $OTHERAPPLNKDIR in the
script, so the adva
On Thu, 31 Jul 2003 00:27:53 +0300 Elias Pouloyiannis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
babbled:
> Supposedly svg could provide resolution-independant graphics for e.
we've got that. already - in a MUCH more advanced form. to do all of svg we'd
need a lot more complexity in the rendering engi
On Tue, 30 Jul 2002 17:15:52 +0200 Danne Lundqvist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
babbled:
> I don't understand how people can dislike such a nice
> thing as xml. However, I don't understand what xml would
> do for Enlightenment either.
why not? performance. simple. parsing xml compared
On Wed, 30 Jul 2003 16:34:33 +0100 Dhruba Bandopadhyay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
babbled:
> Danne Lundqvist wrote:
> > I don't understand how people can dislike such a nice
> > thing as xml. However, I don't understand what xml would
> > do for Enlightenment either.
>
>
> Th
errr quite true...
must have missclicked there somewhere :)
EOT (end of thread)
On Thursday 31 July 2003 00:47, Michael Jennings wrote:
> On Thursday, 31 July 2003, at 00:27:53 (+0300),
>
> Elias Pouloyiannis wrote:
> > Supposedly svg could provide resolution-independant graphics for e.
>
> And
On Thursday, 31 July 2003, at 00:27:53 (+0300),
Elias Pouloyiannis wrote:
> Supposedly svg could provide resolution-independant graphics for e.
And that was related to what I said...how, exactly?
There's really no point in continuing this thread. Can we please drop
it? Thanks.
Michael
--
Mi
Supposedly svg could provide resolution-independant graphics for e.
On Wednesday 30 July 2003 18:33, Michael Jennings wrote:
> On Tuesday, 30 July 2002, at 17:15:52 (+0200),
>
> Danne Lundqvist wrote:
> > I don't understand how people can dislike such a nice thing as xml.
>
> Because people treat
> PS) If you really just want to iconify the windows on your current
> desktop, try attached script (giggle). It could be called by some
> Button or menu.
Lol. I tried the script on E on its own for a laugh and it iconified
every damn thing on the screen including gkrellm2 and the virtual deskto
Beny Spensieri Jr wrote:
I don't know how long it would take to implement this hint, but I
really think it would be nice if it made it into e0.16.6.
1) I think that it is not entirely trivial to implement this. Quite
some logic would be required to handle the "showing desktop" state.
2) I don't thi
* Michael Jennings ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On Wednesday, 30 July 2003, at 12:09:01 (-0400),
> Alan Schmitt wrote:
>
> > By the way, which libast should one use: the one at the top of the
> > cvs tree, or the one included in Eterm ?
>
> Well, since there isn't one included in Eterm, and since
On Wednesday, 30 July 2003, at 12:09:01 (-0400),
Alan Schmitt wrote:
> By the way, which libast should one use: the one at the top of the
> cvs tree, or the one included in Eterm ?
Well, since there isn't one included in Eterm, and since it isn't at
the top of any CVS tree, I'm not sure how to an
* Michael Jennings ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On Wednesday, 30 July 2003, at 10:50:53 (-0400),
> Alan Schmitt wrote:
>
> > After seeing the cvs log this morning I decided to upgrade my
> > eterm. It seem that the pserver cvs is no up to date, so I could not
> > get the latest changes (I guess I
Danne Lundqvist wrote:
I don't understand how people can dislike such a nice
thing as xml. However, I don't understand what xml would
do for Enlightenment either.
This thread isn't making much sense to me either. XML and SVG (based on
XML) are web technologies. E is an application rather than
On Tuesday, 30 July 2002, at 17:15:52 (+0200),
Danne Lundqvist wrote:
> I don't understand how people can dislike such a nice thing as xml.
Because people treat it like the answer to all problems. It isn't.
Michael
--
Michael Jennings (a.k.a. KainX) http://www.kainx.org/ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
I don't understand how people can dislike such a nice
thing as xml. However, I don't understand what xml would
do for Enlightenment either.
/Danne
>>what does the enlightenment staff think about svg?
>>( someone told me raster dislikes xml ... )
>>
>>
>
>I do. quite vehemently. :) i have no p
On Wednesday, 30 July 2003, at 10:50:53 (-0400),
Alan Schmitt wrote:
> After seeing the cvs log this morning I decided to upgrade my
> eterm. It seem that the pserver cvs is no up to date, so I could not
> get the latest changes (I guess I can always apply them by hand). I
> also had a small probl
On Wed, Jul 30, 2003 at 10:50:53AM -0400, Alan Schmitt wrote:
> Hi,
>
> After seeing the cvs log this morning I decided to upgrade my eterm. It
> seem that the pserver cvs is no up to date, so I could not get the
> latest changes (I guess I can always apply them by hand). I also had
> a small p
Hi,
After seeing the cvs log this morning I decided to upgrade my eterm. It
seem that the pserver cvs is no up to date, so I could not get the
latest changes (I guess I can always apply them by hand). I also had
a small problem running configure, which I solved by removing a function
call:
[E
20 matches
Mail list logo
