On Wed, 14 Feb 2007 02:23:17 -0500 Michael Jennings [EMAIL PROTECTED] babbled:
mej is right - autopoint is FUCKED. the fact that it executes cvs alone makes
it a horrid horrid horrid hack. this requires that to work right you need to be
online to rebuild your build files. sorry - developers come
Hello mates,
First, sorry about the double post. I sent it the first time with the
wrong From Addres. That aside
WARNING: Make sure to run in XNest or POOF.
After spending several hours on this and only coming up with temporary
stop gap solutions, I've decided to send this to the list for
Unloading, Disabling, all results in a segfault with the new Net
module. BT Follows
Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
[Switching to Thread -1216330064 (LWP 1274)]
0xb79a3e18 in strcmp () from /lib/libc.so.6
(gdb) bt
#0 0xb79a3e18 in strcmp () from /lib/libc.so.6
#1
Michael Jennings wrote:
On Wednesday, 14 February 2007, at 01:18:46 (+0100),
Kim Woelders wrote:
I still don't quite get all the opposition against autopoint (except
the stupid requirement that the cvs program must be available). In
my opinion automake-1.10 is not broken but people here
Hi,
Sometimes I'm experiencing crashes in E17 when try to run some application
using Run command
or using ibox. When I switch to VT I see 2 enlightenment processes - the one
launched by xinit and it's child.
BT of parent enlightenment process:
Zachary Goldberg wrote:
Unloading, Disabling, all results in a segfault with the new Net
module. BT Follows
This was a bug in edje that rephorm fixed. Update edje :)
dh
-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of
and i thought you were just trying to force me to keep your module :)
Thanks,
Zach
On 2/14/07, Christopher Michael [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Zachary Goldberg wrote:
Unloading, Disabling, all results in a segfault with the new Net
module. BT Follows
This was a bug in edje that rephorm
On Wednesday 14 February 2007, Carsten Haitzler wrote:
if it works for
devs - then it's good. if it doesn't work for users because they updated
their autofoo packages... TOO BAD. autofoo is for developers. using cvs
basically gives you the
responsibility of a developer when it comes to
On Wed, 14 Feb 2007 18:31:21 -0500 Mike Frysinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] babbled:
On Wednesday 14 February 2007, Carsten Haitzler wrote:
if it works for
devs - then it's good. if it doesn't work for users because they updated
their autofoo packages... TOO BAD. autofoo is for developers. using
