Re: [E-devel] itask engaged - pre alpha release

2007-04-25 Thread Thomas Kuther
On Mi, 25.04.07 00:18 Simon TRENY [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, 24 Apr 2007 08:39:06 +0200, Igor \FeR\ Scabini [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote : Daniel Kasak ha scritto: Hannes Janetzek wrote: Hi, itask_ng starts to get usable. So if someone wants to try it's available from svn:

Re: [E-devel] itask engaged - pre alpha release

2007-04-25 Thread Simon TRENY
On Wed, 25 Apr 2007 10:18:46 +0200, Thomas Kuther [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote : On Mi, 25.04.07 00:18 Simon TRENY [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, 24 Apr 2007 08:39:06 +0200, Igor \FeR\ Scabini [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote : Daniel Kasak ha scritto: Hannes Janetzek wrote: Hi,

Re: [E-devel] Ideas for a new 'desklet'-module api

2007-04-25 Thread Simon TRENY
On Wed, 25 Apr 2007 08:07:27 +0900, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote : On Wed, 25 Apr 2007 00:13:22 +0200 Simon TRENY [EMAIL PROTECTED] babbled: On Tue, 24 Apr 2007 15:11:42 +0900, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote : On Wed, 18 Apr 2007

Re: [E-devel] [RFC] SDL Engine

2007-04-25 Thread Simon TRENY
On Tue, 24 Apr 2007 17:33:11 -0500, Nathan Ingersoll [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote : On 4/24/07, Simon TRENY [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: from this: 1. Creation of a drawable 2. Creation of the GL-engine from the drawable 3. While (1) do { engine-render() } to this: 1. Creation of a

Re: [E-devel] [RFC] SDL Engine

2007-04-25 Thread Sebastian Dransfeld
Simon TRENY wrote: On Tue, 24 Apr 2007 17:33:11 -0500, Nathan Ingersoll [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote : On 4/24/07, Simon TRENY [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: from this: 1. Creation of a drawable 2. Creation of the GL-engine from the drawable 3. While (1) do { engine-render() } to this: 1.

Re: [E-devel] [RFC] SDL Engine

2007-04-25 Thread Simon TRENY
On Wed, 25 Apr 2007 17:19:25 +0200, Sebastian Dransfeld [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote : Simon TRENY wrote: On Tue, 24 Apr 2007 17:33:11 -0500, Nathan Ingersoll [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote : On 4/24/07, Simon TRENY [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: from this: 1. Creation of a drawable 2. Creation of

Re: [E-devel] [RFC] SDL Engine

2007-04-25 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cedric's sdl engine email/patch has been hijacked into a bitter battle over evas and opengl :) Simon wrote: It would indeed make the engine generic but then, if the engine swaps the buffers by itself, the Evas couldn't be integrated in an OpenGL application: here is how we

Re: [E-devel] [RFC] SDL Engine

2007-04-25 Thread Simon TRENY
On Wed, 25 Apr 2007 18:56:25 GMT, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote : Cedric's sdl engine email/patch has been hijacked into a bitter battle over evas and opengl :) Simon wrote: It would indeed make the engine generic but then, if the engine swaps the buffers by

Re: [E-devel] WWW!

2007-04-25 Thread Luchezar Petkov
Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote: OK... Ok.. As you may noticed, I've putted some content. I need your opinion on it - is it nice, are the images nice - are they too big or too small or are they nice at all. And... About the content of the site.. We need a small plan. My ideas are: 2)

Re: [E-devel] [RFC] SDL Engine

2007-04-25 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
About your second point, The gl-engine can render to a texture or a pbuffer, there is no problem with this, as long as it doesn't swap the buffers. But as raster said, it is not possible if we want to get good performances with OpenGL, rendering to a texture is slow as hell (don't know muck

Re: [E-devel] WWW!

2007-04-25 Thread dan sinclair
On 25-Apr-07, at 3:05 PM, Luchezar Petkov wrote: Ok.. As you may noticed, I've putted some content. I need your opinion on it - is it nice, are the images nice - are they too big or too small or are they nice at all. I think their a bit on the big side. A few images are fine but I

Re: [E-devel] [RFC] SDL Engine

2007-04-25 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I wrote: I don't know Simon.. want you want is certainly 'seductive' in its own way - it does have a lot of good aspects -- but I wonder if it's maybe just more gl-convenient than really necessary. On the other hand While I think that engine specific buffers, both as

[E-devel] Bug: configure.in in exhibit, extrackt and moon not using pkg-config

2007-04-25 Thread Gaute Hope
Hello Exhibit,extrackt and moon are not using pkg-config, but *package*-config in configure scripts. As far as i can see this is outdated and does not work with current CVS. Ubuntu Feisty with easy_e17.sh: http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=97199 - gaute

Re: [E-devel] WWW!

2007-04-25 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Dan wrote: 1) Rewrite/update the user guide on get-e.org and move it in the official site as user documentation. It will cover ONLY e17 itself and the official modules (ibar, ibox, etc etc) We can cover other applications as we see fit. There is no reason it has to be just e17.

Re: [E-devel] Bug: configure.in in exhibit, extrackt and moon not using pkg-config

2007-04-25 Thread Albin Tonnerre
On Wed, Apr 18, 2007 at 07:25:13PM +0200, Gaute Hope wrote : Hello Exhibit,extrackt and moon are not using pkg-config, but *package*-config in configure scripts. As far as i can see this is outdated and does not work with current CVS. Ubuntu Feisty with easy_e17.sh: