On Sun, 11 Jul 2010, Enlightenment SVN wrote:
Log:
more correct version of the dso fix
Author: raster
Date: 2010-07-11 16:57:08 -0700 (Sun, 11 Jul 2010)
New Revision: 50185
Modified:
trunk/eet/src/bin/Makefile.am
Modified: trunk/eet/src/bin/Makefile.am
On Sun, 11 Jul 2010, Enlightenment SVN wrote:
Log:
dso fix - part of it isnt in e- it's in edbus.
Author: raster
Date: 2010-07-11 17:12:17 -0700 (Sun, 11 Jul 2010)
New Revision: 50187
Modified:
trunk/e_dbus/configure.ac trunk/e_dbus/edbus.pc.in
Modified:
On Mon, 12 Jul 2010, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
On Mon, 5 Jul 2010 17:05:45 +0200 Thomas Janssen thom...@fedoraproject.org
said:
ok. i fixed the dso bits i could see properly - ie by reading your patch. can
you try from svn now and report not a patch, but which binaries/shared
On Mon, 12 Jul 2010, Vincent Torri wrote:
On Mon, 12 Jul 2010, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
On Mon, 5 Jul 2010 17:05:45 +0200 Thomas Janssen thom...@fedoraproject.org
said:
ok. i fixed the dso bits i could see properly - ie by reading your patch. can
you try from svn now and
My comments are inside your text:
On Mon, 2010-07-12 at 10:13 +0900, Carsten Haitzler wrote:
On Sun, 11 Jul 2010 11:03:05 +0300 Tom Hacohen
tom.haco...@partner.samsung.com said:
woo. bidi/shaping... languages i just don't know. so i can't comment there. :)
but as for your content... where
On Mon, 5 Jul 2010, Thomas Janssen wrote:
On Mon, Jul 5, 2010 at 6:20 PM, Vincent Torri vto...@univ-evry.fr wrote:
i'm the Fedora maintainer for the Enlightenment chain. I have a couple
patches (attached) i had to make in order to get it build correctly.
Thanks btw for fixing the upgrade
On Mon, 12 Jul 2010 08:15:22 +0200 (CEST) Vincent Torri vto...@univ-evry.fr
said:
On Sun, 11 Jul 2010, Enlightenment SVN wrote:
Log:
more correct version of the dso fix
Author: raster
Date: 2010-07-11 16:57:08 -0700 (Sun, 11 Jul 2010)
New Revision: 50185
On Mon, 12 Jul 2010 09:41:40 +0300 Tom Hacohen
tom.haco...@partner.samsung.com said:
My comments are inside your text:
On Mon, 2010-07-12 at 10:13 +0900, Carsten Haitzler wrote:
On Sun, 11 Jul 2010 11:03:05 +0300 Tom Hacohen
tom.haco...@partner.samsung.com said:
woo. bidi/shaping...
On Mon, 12 Jul 2010, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
On Mon, 12 Jul 2010 08:15:22 +0200 (CEST) Vincent Torri vto...@univ-evry.fr
said:
On Sun, 11 Jul 2010, Enlightenment SVN wrote:
Log:
more correct version of the dso fix
Author: raster
Date: 2010-07-11
Raster,
On Sun, Jul 11, 2010 at 10:40 PM, Carsten Haitzler ras...@rasterman.com wrote:
i agree. though my take on it is that i'd prefer it to be done as part of the
c
src like this:
This was not done because I'd like to use the same .geneet files for
other languages: one input generates
Am Sun, 4 Jul 2010 13:42:08 +0200 schrieb Andreas Volz:
Am Fri, 2 Jul 2010 12:31:56 +0200 schrieb Brian 'morlenxus' Miculcy:
Hey Andreas,
nice idea with the eooorg module. What you forgot: Once an
openoffice window has beend opened and closed, the prestarted
instance will end too.
On Mon, 12 Jul 2010, Enlightenment SVN wrote:
Log:
Fix accounting safeness logic introduced at rev. 50158.
Author: antognolli
Date: 2010-07-12 10:59:48 -0700 (Mon, 12 Jul 2010)
New Revision: 50202
Modified:
trunk/ecore/src/lib/ecore/ecore_timer.c
Modified:
On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 3:06 PM, Vincent Torri vto...@univ-evry.fr wrote:
On Mon, 12 Jul 2010, Enlightenment SVN wrote:
Log:
Fix accounting safeness logic introduced at rev. 50158.
Author: antognolli
Date: 2010-07-12 10:59:48 -0700 (Mon, 12 Jul 2010)
New Revision: 50202
Am Mon, 12 Jul 2010 20:15:29 +0200 schrieb Brian 'morlenxus' Miculcy:
Ups, you're right. It's 3.2.0 what I use here. Sorry.
regards
Andreas
Are you sure, you're using 3.4? I can't find that version on the
website, i can get 3.2.1 and that's the same version i'm using in
Debian
Hello,
while porting the Elm GenList to C++ I found this code in test_genlist.c:
static void
gl4_exp(void *data, Evas_Object *obj, void *event_info)
{
Elm_Genlist_Item *it = event_info;
Evas_Object *gl = elm_genlist_item_genlist_get(it);
int val = (int)elm_genlist_item_data_get(it);
Hi all,
on the above link you can found a patch for the Genlist python object
http://pastebin.com/W5aRuXKG
The patch add all the methods to connect signal:
callback_clicked_add(self, func, *args, **kwargs)
callback_clicked_del(self, func):
callback_selected_add(self, func, *args, **kwargs)
SVAm Fri, 09 Jul 2010 13:22:53 +0200 schrieb dhp_...@doublehp.org:
After palcing Memo at the right place:
http://picasaweb.google.fr/doublehp/Computing#5491860510868849794
after restart X
http://picasaweb.google.fr/doublehp/Computing#5491860528182159314
after going in the Lost menu:
On Mon, 12 Jul 2010 13:23:22 -0300 Leandro Pereira lean...@profusion.mobi
said:
Raster,
On Sun, Jul 11, 2010 at 10:40 PM, Carsten Haitzler ras...@rasterman.com
wrote:
i agree. though my take on it is that i'd prefer it to be done as part of
the c src like this:
This was not done
On Mon, 12 Jul 2010 11:55:04 +0200 (CEST) Vincent Torri vto...@univ-evry.fr
said:
On Mon, 12 Jul 2010, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
On Mon, 12 Jul 2010 08:15:22 +0200 (CEST) Vincent Torri
vto...@univ-evry.fr said:
On Sun, 11 Jul 2010, Enlightenment SVN wrote:
Ugly, and brings in a problem that does not matter: parse.
The problem being solved is reduce repetitive code that C/eet forces
you, instead of it we'll start doing parsers for different languages,
then people brings in requests for multi line comments, etc
Okay, whe can do single line, dumbed
On Mon, 12 Jul 2010 21:10:21 -0300 Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
barbi...@profusion.mobi said:
but geneet requires i define my struct in 1 place, and then separately keep a
geneet description file in sync with that struct. it also doesn't help solve
the free this for me code generation too. sure - not
21 matches
Mail list logo
