On 11/08/18 03:39, Mike Blumenkrantz wrote:
> Hello,
>
> For some time now, everyone in the community has been expressing
> significant dissatisfaction with the current project management software,
> Phabricator. A number of individuals have proposed switching to Gitlab for
> various reasons.
>
On 12/08/18 07:09, Vinícius dos Santos Oliveira wrote:
> Just curious. I'm not a developer.
>
> But what will happen to Gerrit? I remember one comment of Rasterman years
> ago that he fell in love with Gerrit. What will the migration mean to
> Gerrit?
>
Last time we changed our tools /
Just curious. I'm not a developer.
But what will happen to Gerrit? I remember one comment of Rasterman years
ago that he fell in love with Gerrit. What will the migration mean to
Gerrit?
2018-08-10 15:09 GMT-03:00 Mike Blumenkrantz :
> Hello,
>
> For some time now, everyone in the community has
If you want me to look over some of the HTML stuff you mentioned, I have
plenty of time to do that this weekend.
M
On Fri, Aug 10, 2018 at 5:30 PM, Matthew Zamudio
wrote:
> Thank you! I will get busy on familiarizing myself with C and will install
> Enlightenment and some of the apps. In the
I'm all in favour moving to a self-hosted Gitlab instance. Phabricator
is pretty awful and is not very approachable. Also, Gitlab has really
overtaken Phab in both popularity and maturity in the last 5 years
since we switched.
This will also reduce the admin burden of managing Gitolite, and
Guess then would be to migrate everything and I’ll work on triaging the bigs
after
Sent from my iPhone
> On 11 Aug 2018, at 08:23, Pierre Couderc wrote:
>
>> On 08/11/2018 07:30 AM, jaquil...@eagleeyet.net wrote:
>> If we are going to migrate I think we should migrate tickets slowly to see
On 08/11/2018 07:30 AM, jaquil...@eagleeyet.net wrote:
If we are going to migrate I think we should migrate tickets slowly to
see which ones are still valid and not pollute the new tracker with
issues that are either moot or no longer valid.
Mmm, it is not logical. Migrate is a thing. Process