Re: [E-devel] [PATCH] etk_scrolled_view.c: make scrolled_view + viewport draggable again

2009-04-29 Thread Michael 'Mickey' Lauer
On Tuesday 09 December 2008 13:47:13 Carsten Haitzler wrote: On Tue, 9 Dec 2008 13:34:03 +0100 Michael 'Mickey' Lauer mic...@vanille-media.de babbled: do not consider elementary and guarana separate entities, they're for now, but we'll merge soon, just need time, but xmas is there for

Re: [E-devel] [PATCH] etk_scrolled_view.c: make scrolled_view + viewport draggable again

2008-12-09 Thread Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
On Tue, Dec 9, 2008 at 5:00 AM, Sebastian Dransfeld [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Jose Gonzalez wrote: Sebastian Dransfeld wrote: Jose Gonzalez wrote: Gustavo wrote: On Mon, Dec 1, 2008 at 8:15 AM, John Lee [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ... by adding 3 callbacks to viewport-event and

Re: [E-devel] [PATCH] etk_scrolled_view.c: make scrolled_view + viewport draggable again

2008-12-09 Thread Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
On Tue, Dec 9, 2008 at 9:03 AM, Viktor Kojouharov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Though I really don't think how relevant etk (or ewl for that matter) will be in the future. It's a good bet that raster will use elementary to replace e17's internal widgets (either for e17 or for a future release). If

Re: [E-devel] [PATCH] etk_scrolled_view.c: make scrolled_view + viewport draggable again

2008-12-09 Thread Michael 'Mickey' Lauer
Am Tuesday 09 December 2008 11:38:32 schrieb Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri: On Tue, Dec 9, 2008 at 5:00 AM, Sebastian Dransfeld [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Jose Gonzalez wrote: Sebastian Dransfeld wrote: Jose Gonzalez wrote: Gustavo wrote: On Mon, Dec 1, 2008 at 8:15 AM, John Lee [EMAIL

Re: [E-devel] [PATCH] etk_scrolled_view.c: make scrolled_view + viewport draggable again

2008-12-09 Thread Vincent Torri
quietly behind the scenes we have agreed we need to merge and be 1 - they are close enough in structure and gaols that this is not a technical problem - and it's definitely not a political one. we both very much want a merge. it is simply that both started development in separate pools for

Re: [E-devel] [PATCH] etk_scrolled_view.c: make scrolled_view + viewport draggable again

2008-12-09 Thread Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
On Tue, Dec 9, 2008 at 10:52 AM, Vincent Torri [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: quietly behind the scenes we have agreed we need to merge and be 1 - they are close enough in structure and gaols that this is not a technical problem - and it's definitely not a political one. we both very much want a

Re: [E-devel] [PATCH] etk_scrolled_view.c: make scrolled_view + viewport draggable again

2008-12-09 Thread Dave Andreoli
- Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri [EMAIL PROTECTED] ha scritto: On Tue, Dec 9, 2008 at 5:00 AM, Sebastian Dransfeld [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Jose Gonzalez wrote: Sebastian Dransfeld wrote: Jose Gonzalez wrote: Gustavo wrote: On Mon, Dec 1, 2008 at 8:15 AM, John Lee [EMAIL

Re: [E-devel] [PATCH] etk_scrolled_view.c: make scrolled_view + viewport draggable again

2008-12-09 Thread Viktor Kojouharov
On Tue, 2008-12-09 at 01:57 -0500, Jose Gonzalez wrote: Sebastian Dransfeld wrote: Jose Gonzalez wrote: Gustavo wrote: On Mon, Dec 1, 2008 at 8:15 AM, John Lee [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ... by adding 3 callbacks to viewport-event and connecting

Re: [E-devel] [PATCH] etk_scrolled_view.c: make scrolled_view + viewport draggable again

2008-12-09 Thread The Rasterman
On Tue, 9 Dec 2008 13:34:03 +0100 Michael 'Mickey' Lauer [EMAIL PROTECTED] babbled: do not consider elementary and guarana separate entities, they're for now, but we'll merge soon, just need time, but xmas is there for this kind of thing ;-) Wow, that's good news! quietly behind the

Re: [E-devel] [PATCH] etk_scrolled_view.c: make scrolled_view + viewport draggable again

2008-12-09 Thread Viktor Kojouharov
On Tue, 2008-12-09 at 11:00 -0200, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote: On Tue, Dec 9, 2008 at 10:52 AM, Vincent Torri [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: quietly behind the scenes we have agreed we need to merge and be 1 - they are close enough in structure and gaols that this is not a technical

Re: [E-devel] [PATCH] etk_scrolled_view.c: make scrolled_view + viewport draggable again

2008-12-09 Thread Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
On Tue, Dec 9, 2008 at 12:14 PM, Viktor Kojouharov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, 2008-12-09 at 11:00 -0200, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote: On Tue, Dec 9, 2008 at 10:52 AM, Vincent Torri [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: quietly behind the scenes we have agreed we need to merge and be 1 - they

Re: [E-devel] [PATCH] etk_scrolled_view.c: make scrolled_view + viewport draggable again

2008-12-09 Thread Jose Gonzalez
Dave Andreoli wrote: The only work done on etk is small fixes to keep it usable. and this is mostly dave because he is using for edje_editor... however I see Dave moving to elementary once we have what he needs. and we're not far. Indeed, etk is not well designed and I hape

Re: [E-devel] [PATCH] etk_scrolled_view.c: make scrolled_view + viewport draggable again

2008-12-09 Thread Jose Gonzalez
Viktor Kojouharov wrote: On Tue, 2008-12-09 at 01:57 -0500, Jose Gonzalez wrote: Sebastian Dransfeld wrote: Jose Gonzalez wrote: Gustavo wrote: On Mon, Dec 1, 2008 at 8:15 AM, John Lee [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ... by

Re: [E-devel] [PATCH] etk_scrolled_view.c: make scrolled_view + viewport draggable again

2008-12-09 Thread Dave Andreoli
- Jose Gonzalez [EMAIL PROTECTED] ha scritto: Dave Andreoli wrote: The only work done on etk is small fixes to keep it usable. and this is mostly dave because he is using for edje_editor... however I see Dave moving to elementary once we have what he needs. and we're

Re: [E-devel] [PATCH] etk_scrolled_view.c: make scrolled_view + viewport draggable again

2008-12-09 Thread Jose Gonzalez
Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote: On Tue, Dec 9, 2008 at 5:00 AM, Sebastian Dransfeld [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Jose Gonzalez wrote: Sebastian Dransfeld wrote: Jose Gonzalez wrote: Gustavo wrote: On Mon, Dec 1, 2008 at 8:15 AM, John Lee [EMAIL

Re: [E-devel] [PATCH] etk_scrolled_view.c: make scrolled_view + viewport draggable again

2008-12-08 Thread Jose Gonzalez
Gustavo wrote: On Mon, Dec 1, 2008 at 8:15 AM, John Lee [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ... by adding 3 callbacks to viewport-event and connecting them back to the original callbacks. Signed-off-by: John Lee [EMAIL PROTECTED] nobody replied to this in a while, so I

Re: [E-devel] [PATCH] etk_scrolled_view.c: make scrolled_view + viewport draggable again

2008-12-08 Thread Sebastian Dransfeld
Jose Gonzalez wrote: Gustavo wrote: On Mon, Dec 1, 2008 at 8:15 AM, John Lee [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ... by adding 3 callbacks to viewport-event and connecting them back to the original callbacks. Signed-off-by: John Lee [EMAIL PROTECTED] nobody replied to this

Re: [E-devel] [PATCH] etk_scrolled_view.c: make scrolled_view + viewport draggable again

2008-12-08 Thread Sebastian Dransfeld
Jose Gonzalez wrote: Sebastian Dransfeld wrote: Jose Gonzalez wrote: Gustavo wrote: On Mon, Dec 1, 2008 at 8:15 AM, John Lee [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ... by adding 3 callbacks to viewport-event and connecting them back to the original callbacks.

Re: [E-devel] [PATCH] etk_scrolled_view.c: make scrolled_view + viewport draggable again

2008-12-08 Thread Jose Gonzalez
Sebastian Dransfeld wrote: Jose Gonzalez wrote: Sebastian Dransfeld wrote: Jose Gonzalez wrote: Gustavo wrote: On Mon, Dec 1, 2008 at 8:15 AM, John Lee [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ... by adding 3 callbacks to viewport-event

Re: [E-devel] [PATCH] etk_scrolled_view.c: make scrolled_view + viewport draggable again

2008-12-07 Thread Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
On Mon, Dec 1, 2008 at 8:15 AM, John Lee [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ... by adding 3 callbacks to viewport-event and connecting them back to the original callbacks. Signed-off-by: John Lee [EMAIL PROTECTED] nobody replied to this in a while, so I commited to ETK as it seems to

[E-devel] [PATCH] etk_scrolled_view.c: make scrolled_view + viewport draggable again

2008-12-01 Thread John Lee
... by adding 3 callbacks to viewport-event and connecting them back to the original callbacks. Signed-off-by: John Lee [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- etk/src/lib/etk_scrolled_view.c | 38 ++ 1 files changed, 38 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) diff