On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 8:13 AM, sda wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> > ok. another shot:
>> >> >
>> >> > - can someone advise why i can't use "shaped" borders for menu, gadman
>> >> > popup, exebuf, winlist and modules popups (like tclock) any more?
>> >> >
>> >> in addition - please look at the attached s
On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 5:10 AM, sda wrote:
> On 09:03 Wed 15 Apr , sda wrote:
>> On 08:52 Wed 15 Apr , sda wrote:
>> >
>> > > Fixed as of revision 40073.
>> >
>> > :)
>> >
>> > ok. another shot:
>> >
>> > - can someone advise why i can't use "shaped" borders for menu, gadman
>> > popup,
2009/4/15 Toma :
> 2009/4/15 sda :
>> On 09:45 Wed 15 Apr , Toma wrote:
>>> This is a code issue, not a theme issue...
>>>
>>> Toma.
>>>
>> well, the question is:
>>
>> - why the old theme (link below) is fine?
>> http://trac.enlightenment.org/e/browser/trunk/THEMES/blingbling?rev=40070
>>
>> o
2009/4/15 sda :
> On 09:45 Wed 15 Apr , Toma wrote:
>> This is a code issue, not a theme issue...
>>
>> Toma.
>>
> well, the question is:
>
> - why the old theme (link below) is fine?
> http://trac.enlightenment.org/e/browser/trunk/THEMES/blingbling?rev=40070
>
> or where that magic "make me ha
This is a code issue, not a theme issue...
Toma.
2009/4/15 sda :
> On 08:51 Wed 15 Apr , Toma wrote:
>> And you want it to clip to its set size?
>>
> imho they/(each CONTENT) should fit into the "container" area despite
> on "Appearance" settings. and now we've got "containers" like iBar,
> i
And you want it to clip to its set size?
-Toma
2009/4/15 sda :
> On 06:41 Wed 15 Apr , Toma wrote:
>> > 3) our new default theme ("B&W") still has some minor issues. most
>> > annoying one is the way iBar and iBox look like when they're set in
>> > "Plain" appearance and options "Autoscroll c
> 3) our new default theme ("B&W") still has some minor issues. most
> annoying one is the way iBar and iBox look like when they're set in
> "Plain" appearance and options "Autoscroll contents" + "Able to be
> resized" are activated (yep, i do have up to 40-50 launchers and i do
> like to scroll'em
On Mon, 13 Apr 2009, sda wrote:
Willing to help testing? You can do:
- compare expedite benchmarks on the same system, tell us if you
see regressions.
- check memory usage.
- check if dialogs work properly.
- create a dummy user and start with a clean profile, try to
configure t
> Willing to help testing? You can do:
>
>- compare expedite benchmarks on the same system, tell us if you
> see regressions.
>- check memory usage.
>- check if dialogs work properly.
>- create a dummy user and start with a clean profile, try to
> configure the system the way you
On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 4:30 PM, sda wrote:
>
>> Willing to help testing? You can do:
>>
>> - compare expedite benchmarks on the same system, tell us if you
>> see regressions.
>> - check memory usage.
>> - check if dialogs work properly.
>> - create a dummy user and start with a clean
10 matches
Mail list logo
