On Fri, 22 Sep 2006 18:01:42 -0700 Ben Rockwood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled:
> Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
> > On Fri, 22 Sep 2006 14:13:53 -0500 "Sthithaprajna Garapaty"
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled:
> >
> >> No Mambo. No Joomla.
> >
> > why?
>
> I have to admit that I've never se
Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
> On Fri, 22 Sep 2006 14:13:53 -0500 "Sthithaprajna Garapaty"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled:
>
>> No Mambo. No Joomla.
>
> why?
I have to admit that I've never seen a CMS I actually like, mostly
because the pages look more like a hodge-podge of articles rath
On Fri, 22 Sep 2006 14:13:53 -0500 "Sthithaprajna Garapaty"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled:
> No Mambo. No Joomla.
why?
> On 9/22/06, The Rasterman Carsten Haitzler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Fri, 22 Sep 2006 06:57:13 +0200 Jochen Maes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > babbled:
> >
> > there's also it
On Fri, 22 Sep 2006 14:34:55 -0300 Andres Blanc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled:
> I honestly don't see the need of having *everything* integrated, except for a
> unified authentication system and maintenance
>
> I see the need of an agile way of update information on the website (a wiki),
> exchan
I honestly don't see the need of having *everything* integrated, except for a
unified authentication system and maintenance
I see the need of an agile way of update information on the website (a wiki),
exchange opinions and support (a forum), and a formal channel for users to
present problems t
No Mambo. No Joomla.
On 9/22/06, The Rasterman Carsten Haitzler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, 22 Sep 2006 06:57:13 +0200 Jochen Maes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled:
>
> there's also its alter-ego fork "joomla!" :)
>
> > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> > Hash: SHA1
> >
> > Carsten Haitzler
On Fri, 22 Sep 2006 06:57:13 +0200 Jochen Maes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled:
there's also its alter-ego fork "joomla!" :)
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
> > On Thu, 21 Sep 2006 23:24:42 -0400 Michael Jennings <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > b
On Thu, 21 Sep 2006 23:24:42 -0400 Michael Jennings <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled:
> On Friday, 22 September 2006, at 07:29:22 (+0900),
> Carsten Haitzler wrote:
>
> > ok - something that covers 2 or our 3 major needs (web pages + docs,
> > forums, bug tracker)
>
> You? Want a bug tracker? Serio
On Thursday, 21 September 2006, at 16:08:08 (-0700),
Justin Patrin wrote:
> Be careful. Last I used TikiWiki it was a mess code-wise. Lots of
> places for security holes to pop up and a wiki rendering engine that
> was pure spaghetti. It may have gotten better in the year or so
> since I last used
On Friday, 22 September 2006, at 07:29:22 (+0900),
Carsten Haitzler wrote:
> ok - something that covers 2 or our 3 major needs (web pages + docs,
> forums, bug tracker)
You? Want a bug tracker? Seriously?
I think Hell may have just frozen over.
TW does have a task manager, but it's not very g
On Thu, 21 Sep 2006 15:47:14 -0700 Ben Rockwood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled:
> Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
> > On Thu, 21 Sep 2006 13:58:14 -0400 Michael Jennings <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > babbled:
> >
> >
> >> On Thursday, 21 September 2006, at 15:23:15 (+0900),
> >> Carsten Haitzler
On Thu, 21 Sep 2006 16:07:41 -0700 Ben Rockwood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled:
> Andrew Williams wrote:
> > Using your preferred method "fixing" would require giving CVS write
> > access (and a CVS tutorial for the non-coders) to every person who
> > asked. Seems to me like a non-solution.
> >
>
On 9/21/06, Ben Rockwood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Michael Jennings wrote:
> > On Thursday, 21 September 2006, at 15:23:15 (+0900),
> > Carsten Haitzler wrote:
> >
> >
> >> does anyone know of something that does the whole list of things we
> >> have mentioned we need - in one package that is so
Andrew Williams wrote:
> Using your preferred method "fixing" would require giving CVS write
> access (and a CVS tutorial for the non-coders) to every person who
> asked. Seems to me like a non-solution.
>
To be clear, I'm not saying XSM sucks or doesn't work... but I think its
undeniable that
Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
> On Thu, 21 Sep 2006 13:58:14 -0400 Michael Jennings <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> babbled:
>
>
>> On Thursday, 21 September 2006, at 15:23:15 (+0900),
>> Carsten Haitzler wrote:
>>
>>
>>> does anyone know of something that does the whole list of things we
Michael Jennings wrote:
> On Thursday, 21 September 2006, at 15:23:15 (+0900),
> Carsten Haitzler wrote:
>
>
>> does anyone know of something that does the whole list of things we
>> have mentioned we need - in one package that is solid and easy to
>> use, reliable, efficient, secure etc.?
>>
On Thu, 21 Sep 2006 13:58:14 -0400 Michael Jennings <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled:
> On Thursday, 21 September 2006, at 15:23:15 (+0900),
> Carsten Haitzler wrote:
>
> > does anyone know of something that does the whole list of things we
> > have mentioned we need - in one package that is solid and
FYI: you can try CMS and stuff on http://www.opensourcecms.com/
Tikiwiki included
smell you soon =)
--
Callea Gaetano Andrea
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Tec
On Thursday, 21 September 2006, at 15:23:15 (+0900),
Carsten Haitzler wrote:
> does anyone know of something that does the whole list of things we
> have mentioned we need - in one package that is solid and easy to
> use, reliable, efficient, secure etc.?
TikiWiki is one I use for a couple sites.
On Thursday, 21 September 2006, at 03:37:11 (+0200),
Cristalle Azundris Sabon wrote:
> I'm not convinced that's the case, really, but if it were, wouldn't
> that be his prerogative? This is volunteer work, presumably done
> for fun, and that's that.
Agreed 100%. Ben is certainly entitled to his
On Thu, 21 Sep 2006 11:01:49 +0100 Andrew Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
babbled:
> On Wed, 2006-09-20 at 16:59 -0700, Ben Rockwood wrote:
> > Michael, chill. Lets look at the facts shall we:
> >
> > 1) Since moving to XSM updates have almost complete stopped. The
> > changes in the last 2 years
On Wed, 2006-09-20 at 16:59 -0700, Ben Rockwood wrote:
> Michael, chill. Lets look at the facts shall we:
>
> 1) Since moving to XSM updates have almost complete stopped. The
> changes in the last 2 years are all trivial. (Minus the redesign work.)
This has nothing to do with XSM as far as I c
On Wed, 20 Sep 2006 16:59:10 -0700 Ben Rockwood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled:
well the plan for now is dependent on when e.org moves.
what i have noticed is we have a fairly big "i dont like xsm" camp. the biggest
complaints are ui and speed. frankly adding a news item should take no more
than 5 s
I don't know which xsm version e.org runs, nor if the slowness is
because of the machine. But as i use xsm for the get-e.org maintaince i
can say that is has been speeded up a lot since my first contact one year ago.
30 minutes for a simple news post is really not acceptable - but on
get-e.org it i
On Wednesday, 20 September 2006, at 16:59:10 (-0700),
Ben Rockwood wrote:
> 1) Since moving to XSM updates have almost complete stopped. The
> changes in the last 2 years are all trivial. (Minus the redesign work.)
I'm trying to forget the past transgressions that may have occurred
and focus on
Michael Jennings wrote:
> On Wednesday, 20 September 2006, at 10:51:36 (-0700),
> Ben Rockwood wrote:
>
>
>> I've made it clear over the years that so long as we're using
>> Rectang XSM I won't touch the site. I used it a couple of times and
>> the frustration, speed, and capabilities of XSM ar
On Wednesday, 20 September 2006, at 10:51:36 (-0700),
Ben Rockwood wrote:
> I've made it clear over the years that so long as we're using
> Rectang XSM I won't touch the site. I used it a couple of times and
> the frustration, speed, and capabilities of XSM are totally
> inexcusable. I have a gr
Hey Guys,
Sorry I've been away for so long. I'm still here, just in hiding. I
just wanted to chime in that I am fully willing to redo the site and do
what needs to be done to get that horrible pile of crap (90% of which I
wrote and hasn't been changing in 2+ years) fixed. I've made it clear
o
On Sat, 16 Sep 2006 14:20:59 -0300 Andres Blanc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled:
and what about the rest of it? so we have yet another independent piece of
code/site that doesn't work with the rest :( we need to at least scout for
something that offers all of what we need - OR we modify what we have t
I would recommend against Drupal for forums, they don't look good, they lack
basic functionality in many browsers, the search function doesn't work very
well, and yet remain complex to maintain.
My recomendation would be RForum (http://rforum.andreas-s.net/rforum).
That merges the froum with the
On Wed, 13 Sep 2006 10:32:00 +0100 Andrew Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
babbled:
OK - I have been waiting for the dust to settle (too much email to handle!) :)
I will summarise what I think the WEBSITE needs (regular builds with errors are
orthogonal to the WEBSITE - they can output web pages to b
On 13-Sep-06, at 9:38 PM, Kevin Brosius wrote:
> dan sinclair wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On 13-Sep-06, at 8:04 PM, Kevin Brosius wrote:
>>
>>> dan sinclair wrote:
Just thought of two more possible things for the site.
>>>
>>> I think you are going way overboard. :P
>>>
>>
>> Maybe. We possibly
dan sinclair wrote:
>
>
>
> On 13-Sep-06, at 8:04 PM, Kevin Brosius wrote:
>
> > dan sinclair wrote:
> >>
> >> Just thought of two more possible things for the site.
> >
> > I think you are going way overboard. :P
> >
>
> Maybe. We possibly don't want half the things that I've listed. I'm
> ju
On 13-Sep-06, at 8:04 PM, Kevin Brosius wrote:
> dan sinclair wrote:
>>
>> Just thought of two more possible things for the site.
>
> I think you are going way overboard. :P
>
Maybe. We possibly don't want half the things that I've listed. I'm
just trying to work out what we do want. We have a
dan sinclair wrote:
>
>
> Andrew Williams wrote:
> > dan sinclair wrote:
> >> Hello,
> >>
> >> Ok, haven't got a lot of responses (not that I gave it a huge amount
> >> of time, I'm inpatent) but, a follow on email to what we want out of
> >> the site.
> >>
> >> How do we get it.
> >>
> >> Lets u
> > I want to here what you like. I only want to hear it _once_.
> > I _don't_ want to hear you bitch about what someone else likes.
>
> I want a pony.
>
I want a bicycle.
-
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to s
Andrew Williams wrote:
> dan sinclair wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> Ok, haven't got a lot of responses (not that I gave it a huge amount
>> of time, I'm inpatent) but, a follow on email to what we want out of
>> the site.
>>
>> How do we get it.
>>
>> Lets us assume, for now, XSM is our CMS of choice. I
dan sinclair wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Ok, haven't got a lot of responses (not that I gave it a huge amount of
> time, I'm inpatent) but, a follow on email to what we want out of the site.
>
> How do we get it.
>
> Lets us assume, for now, XSM is our CMS of choice. It will handle the
> static pages for
dan sinclair wrote:
> On 12-Sep-06, at 11:37 PM, David Seikel wrote:
>
>> On Tue, 12 Sep 2006 21:38:27 -0400 dan sinclair <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>> 1- User forums. The easiest is to grab something previously created
>>> and use that. There are two issues.
>>> a) do we want to migrate data from ed
On 12-Sep-06, at 11:37 PM, David Seikel wrote:
> On Tue, 12 Sep 2006 21:38:27 -0400 dan sinclair <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
>> The FAQ will be XSM. If we want to hook up for the user to download
>> the faq to their system we can grab the .xml file XSM generates and
>> post process if needed
>
On Tue, 12 Sep 2006 21:38:27 -0400 dan sinclair <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> The FAQ will be XSM. If we want to hook up for the user to download
> the faq to their system we can grab the .xml file XSM generates and
> post process if needed
We have two XML parsers in CVS, maybe we can make use of
Hello,
Ok, haven't got a lot of responses (not that I gave it a huge amount of
time, I'm inpatent) but, a follow on email to what we want out of the site.
How do we get it.
Lets us assume, for now, XSM is our CMS of choice. It will handle the
static pages for all 'normal pages'. It will handle
42 matches
Mail list logo
