On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 01:40:37PM +0800, Carsten Haitzler wrote:
On Wed, 11 Jun 2008 15:12:21 +1000 Simon Horman [EMAIL PROTECTED] babbled:
From reading Raster's comments, I gleen that the idea is basically to
leave the debian/ directroes in CVS, generally speaking containing
a
Please, no. This was intentionnaly reverted because it causes a build failure
when using tarballs created by 'make distcheck', as the debian dir is not
included in them (on purpose)
On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 03:58:05AM -0400, Enlightenment CVS wrote :
Enlightenment CVS committal
Author : horms
Ok, please feel free to revert the change.
But how does debian/changelog get created?
On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 11:21:30AM +0200, Albin Tonnerre wrote:
Please, no. This was intentionnaly reverted because it causes a build failure
when using tarballs created by 'make distcheck', as the debian dir
On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 7:54 AM, Simon Horman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ok, please feel free to revert the change.
But how does debian/changelog get created?
this is up to the packager, as the whole debian/ folder. They should
keep a changelog of their changes... this is not the changelog of the
On Tuesday, 10 June 2008, at 11:21:30 (+0200),
Albin Tonnerre wrote:
Please, no. This was intentionnaly reverted because it causes a
build failure when using tarballs created by 'make distcheck', as
the debian dir is not included in them (on purpose)
I still think this is a huge mistake.
On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 5:35 PM, Michael Jennings [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tuesday, 10 June 2008, at 11:21:30 (+0200),
Albin Tonnerre wrote:
Please, no. This was intentionnaly reverted because it causes a
build failure when using tarballs created by 'make distcheck', as
the debian dir is
On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 10:35 PM, Michael Jennings [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tuesday, 10 June 2008, at 11:21:30 (+0200),
Albin Tonnerre wrote:
Please, no. This was intentionnaly reverted because it causes a
build failure when using tarballs created by 'make distcheck', as
the debian
On Tuesday, 10 June 2008, at 18:00:37 (-0300),
Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote:
I'm not a packager myself, but all the packagers that I know hate
this, and seems that it's written somewhere in debian packager docs
that debian/ folders should not be part of the project.
That's fine for the
On Tuesday, 10 June 2008, at 23:13:21 (+0200),
Falko Schmidt wrote:
Nevertheless, the base directory should be free of Debian files or
references to them (especially ./Makefile.am and ./configure.in) as
that breaks make distcheck for packagers which use different debian
directories as Albin
On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 02:13:32PM -0700, Michael Jennings wrote :
On Tuesday, 10 June 2008, at 18:00:37 (-0300),
Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote:
I'm not a packager myself, but all the packagers that I know hate
this, and seems that it's written somewhere in debian packager docs
that
On Tuesday, 10 June 2008, at 23:46:04 (+0200),
Albin Tonnerre wrote:
If people want to do this, they *are* able to: all they need is
checking out the CVS, which contains the debian dirs.
Sorry, I meant tarballs, not CVS. The result of make dist or make
distcheck should be suitable for
On Tue, 10 Jun 2008 18:00:37 -0700 Michael Jennings [EMAIL PROTECTED] babbled:
one way, or another, we tried to help debian packaging by providing the stuff
they need. they soundly rejected our help as unhelpful to them. after much
bemoaning on their part of it being a pain, we agree dot keep
On Wednesday, 11 June 2008, at 09:12:16 (+0800),
Carsten Haitzler wrote:
one way, or another, we tried to help debian packaging by providing
the stuff they need. they soundly rejected our help as unhelpful to
them. after much bemoaning on their part of it being a pain, we
agree dot keep
On Tue, 10 Jun 2008 18:17:23 -0700 Michael Jennings [EMAIL PROTECTED] babbled:
On Wednesday, 11 June 2008, at 09:12:16 (+0800),
Carsten Haitzler wrote:
one way, or another, we tried to help debian packaging by providing
the stuff they need. they soundly rejected our help as unhelpful to
On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 01:35:22PM -0700, Michael Jennings wrote:
On Tuesday, 10 June 2008, at 11:21:30 (+0200),
Albin Tonnerre wrote:
Please, no. This was intentionnaly reverted because it causes a
build failure when using tarballs created by 'make distcheck', as
the debian dir is not
On Wed, 11 Jun 2008 14:57:20 +1000 Simon Horman [EMAIL PROTECTED] babbled:
On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 01:35:22PM -0700, Michael Jennings wrote:
On Tuesday, 10 June 2008, at 11:21:30 (+0200),
Albin Tonnerre wrote:
Please, no. This was intentionnaly reverted because it causes a
build
On Wed, 11 Jun 2008 15:12:21 +1000 Simon Horman [EMAIL PROTECTED] babbled:
From reading Raster's comments, I gleen that the idea is basically to
leave the debian/ directroes in CVS, generally speaking containing
a changelog.in but no changelog. And not distributing the debian/
directory in
17 matches
Mail list logo
