On Monday, 29 December 2003, at 15:36:42 (-0500),
Trey Gruel wrote:
> scale:
> Neopolis-horizon.jpg
> day-night.jpg
> nebula.jpg
> ripple.jpg
> wasteland.jpg
> wintertree.jpg
Looks like you removed good-morning.jpg, sunset.jpg, and pond.jpg.
I'd already removed pong.jpg, and I tend to agree with
On Tuesday, 30 December 2003, at 13:32:38 (-0500),
Trey Gruel wrote:
> i know about ; and the command line, but is there a problem with @
> in the escape sequence?
Nope. It works fine. Give it a try. :)
Michael
--
Michael Jennings (a.k.a. KainX) http://www.kainx.org/ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
n
> If possible, I'd like to get rid of the whole pixmaps.list thing
> anyway. It's a kludge at best and doesn't really offer the simplicity
> and flexibility I'd like. What I want to see is a way to have one or
> more directories where images can be placed that will automatically be
> picked up by
On Tuesday, 30 December 2003, at 12:25:59 (-0500),
Trey Gruel wrote:
> it seems that most of the geometry info in the menuitems is also in
> pixmaps.list. the only info missing from pixmaps.list i can see is
> the escape codes and the lack of the '+50+50' at the end of the
> scaled pix. also the
> > the random bg image at start is from the pixmaps.list, but the menus
> > themselves are in the menu.cfg file from your theme which is not
> > dynamic.
>
> I wish they *could* be dynamic, but the challenge is finding a way to
> dynamically generate menus from directories without losing, e.g.,
>
On Monday, 29 December 2003, at 15:07:50 (-0500),
Trey Gruel wrote:
> the random bg image at start is from the pixmaps.list, but the menus
> themselves are in the menu.cfg file from your theme which is not
> dynamic.
I wish they *could* be dynamic, but the challenge is finding a way to
dynamicall
> > personally, i nuke about half of them from the default install.
> > mainly the ones that i consider too bright or too busy (i seem to
> > recal one with a ship in a previous release). my concern about the
> > size of the submenus was mostly for those who don't.
>
> I was hoping for some speci
> > they look great to me. will those be in addition to the current set of
> > backgrounds or as a replacement? the reason i ask is, if they're
> > additions, the tiled pix submenu will get way too long unless
> > subgroups are created.
> This submenu is generated how? I added a ton of images
On Monday, 29 December 2003, at 15:01:26 (-0500),
Trey Gruel wrote:
> personally, i nuke about half of them from the default install.
> mainly the ones that i consider too bright or too busy (i seem to
> recal one with a ship in a previous release). my concern about the
> size of the submenus was
> > they look great to me. will those be in addition to the current set
> > of backgrounds or as a replacement? the reason i ask is, if they're
> > additions, the tiled pix submenu will get way too long unless
> > subgroups are created.
>
> I haven't entirely decided. The 0*.jpg ones are defini
On Mon, Dec 29, 2003 at 01:53:18PM -0600, Corey Donohoe wrote:
> This submenu is generated how?
Maybe Etbg_update_list.
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials.
Become an expert in LINUX or just sharpen your skills. Sign
* Trey Gruel ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > That should happen fairly soon. The sooner I get opinions on the new
> > backgrounds, the sooner I release. :)
>
> they look great to me. will those be in addition to the current set of
> backgrounds or as a replacement? the reason i ask is, if they'
On Monday, 29 December 2003, at 14:45:55 (-0500),
Hall Stevenson wrote:
> Backgrounds for Eterm ?? What's that ?? I always use
> transparency :-)
Then see how they look as desktop backgrounds. :P
Michael
--
Michael Jennings (a.k.a. KainX) http://www.kainx.org/ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
n + 1,
Michael Jennings wrote:
>On Saturday, 22 November 2003, at 20:17:34 (-0500),
>Laurence J. Lane wrote:
>
>
>
>>A user mentioned this a while ago. The fix works for me and
>>backported quite easily.
>>
>>Release 0.9.3 when you get a chance.
>>
>>Thanks. Have a nice day.
>>
>>
>
>That should ha
On Monday, 29 December 2003, at 13:45:51 (-0500),
Trey Gruel wrote:
> they look great to me. will those be in addition to the current set
> of backgrounds or as a replacement? the reason i ask is, if they're
> additions, the tiled pix submenu will get way too long unless
> subgroups are created.
> That should happen fairly soon. The sooner I get opinions on the new
> backgrounds, the sooner I release. :)
they look great to me. will those be in addition to the current set of
backgrounds or as a replacement? the reason i ask is, if they're
additions, the tiled pix submenu will get way
On Saturday, 22 November 2003, at 20:17:34 (-0500),
Laurence J. Lane wrote:
> A user mentioned this a while ago. The fix works for me and
> backported quite easily.
>
> Release 0.9.3 when you get a chance.
>
> Thanks. Have a nice day.
That should happen fairly soon. The sooner I get opinions o
On Sat, Nov 22, 2003 at 09:56:11AM -0500, Michael Jennings wrote:
> As promised. :-) The CVS version should work fully with an
> EWMH-only version of E. If it doesn't, please let me know.
A user mentioned this a while ago. The fix works for me and backported
quite easily.
Release 0.9.3 when
On Saturday, 22 November 2003, at 10:29:04 (+0100),
Kim Woelders wrote:
> It looks like I'm the one who missed something :( I'm still running
> the released 0.9.2 which does use _WIN_WORKSPACE. I see now that
> this has been fixed in CVS.
As promised. :-) The CVS version should work fully with
Michael Jennings wrote:
On Friday, 21 November 2003, at 23:08:48 (+0100),
Kim Woelders wrote:
Ah! That reminds me that Eterm is broken wrt. background transparency
unless compiling E with --enable-hints-gnome (which is not the case in
the rh9 rpm's on SF).
I assume Eterm relies on _WIN_WORKSPACE
20 matches
Mail list logo
