Just because I am little bit annoyed by this troll, I will answer at
the top of this message. We are not considering moving to another SCM.
If you want to setup a git svn on github, fine. But no need to troll
in this thread, we should be speaking about commit message policy. So
I hope, that the lat
Have to agree with Eduardo Felipe.
We're doing the ~exact~ same thing here at our company, having a
periodically git-svn synced repository to work on.
AND I also had the same thought about creating github repositories to
be synced regularly, it would be so much easier.
Maybe it's because it's a mor
On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 6:23 PM, Carsten Haitzler wrote:
> On Thu, 9 Sep 2010 18:35:46 +0200 Cedric BAIL said:
>
>> On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 6:15 PM, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
>> wrote:
>> > After lots of people complaining to me at IRC, mail and others, I'd
>> > like to ask you developers to improv
On Thu, 9 Sep 2010 17:59:42 -0300 Eduardo Felipe
said:
> My company uses git-svn, with a "curated" version of EFL, internally.
> We cherry-pick fixes and only get in sync with svn HEAD on
> snapshots/releases. There's been a lot of discussion internally if we
> should publish our repository on gi
On Thu, 9 Sep 2010 15:01:46 -0300 Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
said:
> >>> As you know, a couple of weeks ago, I had a little poll [0] around.
> > As some already mentioned, I need to extend this poll by another one e.g.
> > "Which VCS would you like to use with EFL?". Still the outcomes of this
> >
On Thu, 9 Sep 2010 18:35:46 +0200 Cedric BAIL said:
> On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 6:15 PM, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
> wrote:
> > After lots of people complaining to me at IRC, mail and others, I'd
> > like to ask you developers to improve commits and particularly their
> > messages.
> >
> > 1 - The m
On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 3:01 PM, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 1:49 PM, Leif Middelschulte
> wrote:
>>
>> Am 09.09.2010 um 18:41 schrieb Cedric BAIL:
>>
>>> On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 6:35 PM, Leif Middelschulte
>>> wrote:
Hey guys,
with regards to the commit
On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 1:49 PM, Leif Middelschulte
wrote:
>
> Am 09.09.2010 um 18:41 schrieb Cedric BAIL:
>
>> On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 6:35 PM, Leif Middelschulte
>> wrote:
>>> Hey guys,
>>>
>>> with regards to the commit message part:
>>> I think it might be an idea to formalize the header of a c
On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 1:15 PM, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
wrote:
> As we're approaching a release, I'd like to ask you all, including
> Raster, to try to be kind and improve over these topics.
>
> Comments? Suggestions?
>
I agree with all the points Barbieri raised. It's much easier to
follow th
Am 09.09.2010 um 18:41 schrieb Cedric BAIL:
> On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 6:35 PM, Leif Middelschulte
> wrote:
>> Hey guys,
>>
>> with regards to the commit message part:
>> I think it might be an idea to formalize the header of a commit message and
>> make the server reject commits if necessary.
>
On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 6:35 PM, Leif Middelschulte
wrote:
> Hey guys,
>
> with regards to the commit message part:
> I think it might be an idea to formalize the header of a commit message and
> make the server reject commits if necessary.
>
> Am 09.09.2010 um 18:22 schrieb Leandro Pereira:
>> On
On Thu, 9 Sep 2010, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> After lots of people complaining to me at IRC, mail and others, I'd
> like to ask you developers to improve commits and particularly their
> messages.
>
> 1 - The most complained annoyance is by far commits that break SVN,
> makin
Hey guys,
with regards to the commit message part:
I think it might be an idea to formalize the header of a commit message and
make the server reject commits if necessary.
Am 09.09.2010 um 18:22 schrieb Leandro Pereira:
> On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 1:15 PM, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
> wrote:
>> 4 -
On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 6:15 PM, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
wrote:
> After lots of people complaining to me at IRC, mail and others, I'd
> like to ask you developers to improve commits and particularly their
> messages.
>
> 1 - The most complained annoyance is by far commits that break SVN,
> making
On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 1:15 PM, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
wrote:
> 4 - The fourth annoyance is related to the previous and is could be
> called "commit torrent" or "ssh over svn" or "gcc over svn" and is the
> result of people committing every line or test they do, then
> committing couple of chang
Hi all,
After lots of people complaining to me at IRC, mail and others, I'd
like to ask you developers to improve commits and particularly their
messages.
1 - The most complained annoyance is by far commits that break SVN,
making it unreliable for users... and if you recall we don't have
releases
16 matches
Mail list logo
