On Sat, 6 Mar 2010 00:53:32 +0300 Andrian Nord said:
> On Sat, Mar 06, 2010 at 05:35:46AM +1100, Carsten Haitzler wrote:
> > On Fri, 5 Mar 2010 19:10:55 +0100 (CET) Vincent Torri
> > said:
> >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Sat, 6 Mar 2010, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
> > >
> > > >> Also,
On Sat, Mar 06, 2010 at 05:35:46AM +1100, Carsten Haitzler wrote:
> On Fri, 5 Mar 2010 19:10:55 +0100 (CET) Vincent Torri
> said:
>
> >
> >
> > On Sat, 6 Mar 2010, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
> >
> > >> Also, there is a problem with 'e' - as you've merged most of usefull
> > >> mod
On Fri, Mar 5, 2010 at 7:54 PM, Vincent Torri wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, 5 Mar 2010, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Mar 5, 2010 at 3:35 PM, Carsten Haitzler
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Fri, 5 Mar 2010 19:10:55 +0100 (CET) Vincent Torri
>>>
>>> said:
>>>
On Sat, 6 Mar 2010, Carste
On Fri, 5 Mar 2010, Vincent Torri wrote:
On Fri, 5 Mar 2010, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote:
On Fri, Mar 5, 2010 at 3:35 PM, Carsten Haitzler
wrote:
On Fri, 5 Mar 2010 19:10:55 +0100 (CET) Vincent Torri
said:
On Sat, 6 Mar 2010, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
Also, there
On Fri, 5 Mar 2010, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote:
On Fri, Mar 5, 2010 at 3:35 PM, Carsten Haitzler wrote:
On Fri, 5 Mar 2010 19:10:55 +0100 (CET) Vincent Torri
said:
On Sat, 6 Mar 2010, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
Also, there is a problem with 'e' - as you've merged most
On Fri, Mar 5, 2010 at 3:35 PM, Carsten Haitzler wrote:
> On Fri, 5 Mar 2010 19:10:55 +0100 (CET) Vincent Torri
> said:
>
>>
>>
>> On Sat, 6 Mar 2010, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
>>
>> >> Also, there is a problem with 'e' - as you've merged most of usefull
>> >> modules inside e itsel
On Fri, 5 Mar 2010 19:10:55 +0100 (CET) Vincent Torri
said:
>
>
> On Sat, 6 Mar 2010, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
>
> >> Also, there is a problem with 'e' - as you've merged most of usefull
> >> modules inside e itself, now it is very difficult to switch off/on some
> >> module (yo
On Fri, Mar 5, 2010 at 3:22 PM, Vincent Torri wrote:
> On Fri, 5 Mar 2010, Andrian Nord wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Mar 05, 2010 at 08:17:48AM +1100, Carsten Haitzler wrote:
>>> it is an argument.. why? because it's our code. our repository. those bugs
>>> have
>>> existed - i remember vaguel working on
On Fri, 5 Mar 2010, Andrian Nord wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 05, 2010 at 08:17:48AM +1100, Carsten Haitzler wrote:
>> it is an argument.. why? because it's our code. our repository. those bugs
>> have
>> existed - i remember vaguel working on it - no, i didn't have a link- hell i
>> dont think i had
On Sat, 6 Mar 2010, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
>> Also, there is a problem with 'e' - as you've merged most of usefull modules
>> inside e itself, now it is very difficult to switch off/on some module (you
>> will be forced to rebuild whole e to get just one module additional). If
>
On Fri, 5 Mar 2010 14:06:15 +0300 Andrian Nord said:
> On Fri, Mar 05, 2010 at 08:17:48AM +1100, Carsten Haitzler wrote:
> > it is an argument.. why? because it's our code. our repository. those bugs
> > have existed - i remember vaguel working on it - no, i didn't have a link-
> > hell i dont t
On Sat, 6 Mar 2010 01:53:36 +1000 David Seikel said:
> On Fri, 5 Mar 2010 19:29:18 +1100 Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman)
> wrote:
>
> > On Fri, 5 Mar 2010 15:52:52 +1000 David Seikel
> > said:
> >
> > > On Fri, 5 Mar 2010 08:20:33 +1100 Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman)
> > > wrote:
> > >
>
On Fri, 5 Mar 2010 19:29:18 +1100 Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman)
wrote:
> On Fri, 5 Mar 2010 15:52:52 +1000 David Seikel
> said:
>
> > On Fri, 5 Mar 2010 08:20:33 +1100 Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman)
> > wrote:
> >
> > > On Thu, 4 Mar 2010 17:14:42 -0300 Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
> > > sa
On Fri, Mar 05, 2010 at 08:17:48AM +1100, Carsten Haitzler wrote:
> it is an argument.. why? because it's our code. our repository. those bugs
> have
> existed - i remember vaguel working on it - no, i didn't have a link- hell i
> dont think i had a link at the time. it was discovered, fixed so i
On Fri, 5 Mar 2010 15:52:52 +1000 David Seikel said:
> On Fri, 5 Mar 2010 08:20:33 +1100 Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman)
> wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 4 Mar 2010 17:14:42 -0300 Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
> > said:
> >
> > > On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 4:13 PM, Thomas Sachau
> > > wrote: ...
> > > > For R
On Fri, 5 Mar 2010 08:20:33 +1100 Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman)
wrote:
> On Thu, 4 Mar 2010 17:14:42 -0300 Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
> said:
>
> > On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 4:13 PM, Thomas Sachau
> > wrote: ...
> > > For README: Creating an empty README file in the repo will really
> > > fix th
On Thu, 04 Mar 2010 20:13:55 +0100 Thomas Sachau said:
> On 03/04/2010 02:23 AM, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
> > On Wed, 03 Mar 2010 19:20:13 +0100 Thomas Sachau said:
> >
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> i tried to compile all packages, which are as ebuilds in official Gentoo
> >> enlightenment
On Thu, 4 Mar 2010 17:14:42 -0300 Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
said:
> On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 4:13 PM, Thomas Sachau wrote:
> ...
> > For README: Creating an empty README file in the repo will really fix the
> > issue and does not create any pain with versioned README. Touching it in
> > autogent.sh
On Wed, 03 Mar 2010 19:56:55 +0100, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 3:20 PM, Thomas Sachau wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> i tried to compile all packages, which are as ebuilds in official
>> Gentoo enlightenment overlay from
>> svn and i found some issues, which i will list bel
On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 4:13 PM, Thomas Sachau wrote:
...
> For README: Creating an empty README file in the repo will really fix the
> issue and does not create
> any pain with versioned README. Touching it in autogent.sh is also just a
> workaround hiding the real
> issue.
empty is wrong, as f
On 03/04/2010 02:23 AM, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
> On Wed, 03 Mar 2010 19:20:13 +0100 Thomas Sachau said:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> i tried to compile all packages, which are as ebuilds in official Gentoo
>> enlightenment overlay from svn and i found some issues, which i will list
>> below:
>
On Wed, 3 Mar 2010 15:56:55 -0300 Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
said:
> On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 3:20 PM, Thomas Sachau wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > i tried to compile all packages, which are as ebuilds in official Gentoo
> > enlightenment overlay from svn and i found some issues, which i will list
> > below
On Wed, 03 Mar 2010 19:20:13 +0100 Thomas Sachau said:
> Hi,
>
> i tried to compile all packages, which are as ebuilds in official Gentoo
> enlightenment overlay from svn and i found some issues, which i will list
> below:
>
> Missing README file, when README.in exists, lets automake bail out:
On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 6:44 PM, Vincent Torri wrote:
> On Wed, 3 Mar 2010, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote:
>> On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 3:20 PM, Thomas Sachau wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> i tried to compile all packages, which are as ebuilds in official Gentoo
>>> enlightenment overlay from
>>> svn an
On Wed, 3 Mar 2010, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 3:20 PM, Thomas Sachau wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> i tried to compile all packages, which are as ebuilds in official Gentoo
>> enlightenment overlay from
>> svn and i found some issues, which i will list below:
>
> Hi Thomas!
On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 3:20 PM, Thomas Sachau wrote:
> Hi,
>
> i tried to compile all packages, which are as ebuilds in official Gentoo
> enlightenment overlay from
> svn and i found some issues, which i will list below:
Hi Thomas! Thanks for the report.
> Missing README file, when README.in e
Hi,
i tried to compile all packages, which are as ebuilds in official Gentoo
enlightenment overlay from
svn and i found some issues, which i will list below:
Missing README file, when README.in exists, lets automake bail out:
eet
embryo
imlib2_loaders
ecore
evas
autogen.sh containing lines, wh
27 matches
Mail list logo
