Re: [E-devel] Debian Installer (d-i) hack for installing Enlightenment WM and Terminology

2025-02-12 Thread Carsten Haitzler
On Wed, 12 Feb 2025 04:20:48 -0800 [email protected] said: > Niltze [Привет : Hello]- > > I had a rough time installing Debian into a laptop-like device without > ethernet cable plug orifice and only offering rtw89 wifi device. I even > tried an 'official' Debian netboot Installer media with

[E-devel] Debian Installer (d-i) hack for installing Enlightenment WM and Terminology

2025-02-12 Thread jose . r . r
Niltze [Привет : Hello]- I had a rough time installing Debian into a laptop-like device without ethernet cable plug orifice and only offering rtw89 wifi device. I even tried an 'official' Debian netboot Installer media without success: kernel modules did not recognize any of the rtw89 module s

Re: [E-devel] Debian Sid (Unstable) packagings for efl-1.23.3 and E23 e17_0.23.1

2020-02-19 Thread Carsten Haitzler
On Tue, 18 Feb 2020 23:08:46 -0800 Ross Vandegrift said: > On Tue, Feb 18, 2020 at 12:02:45AM +, Carsten Haitzler wrote: > > On Mon, 17 Feb 2020 15:30:04 -0800 Ross Vandegrift said: > > > > > On Mon, Feb 17, 2020 at 09:41:48AM +, Carsten Haitzler wrote: > > > > On Sun, 16 Feb 2020 22:37

Re: [E-devel] Debian Sid (Unstable) packagings for efl-1.23.3 and E23 e17_0.23.1

2020-02-18 Thread Ross Vandegrift
On Tue, Feb 18, 2020 at 12:02:45AM +, Carsten Haitzler wrote: > On Mon, 17 Feb 2020 15:30:04 -0800 Ross Vandegrift said: > > > On Mon, Feb 17, 2020 at 09:41:48AM +, Carsten Haitzler wrote: > > > On Sun, 16 Feb 2020 22:37:40 -0800 Ross Vandegrift > > > said: > > > > On Sat, Feb 15, 2020

Re: [E-devel] Debian Sid (Unstable) packagings for efl-1.23.3 and E23 e17_0.23.1

2020-02-17 Thread Carsten Haitzler
On Mon, 17 Feb 2020 15:30:04 -0800 Ross Vandegrift said: > On Mon, Feb 17, 2020 at 09:41:48AM +, Carsten Haitzler wrote: > > On Sun, 16 Feb 2020 22:37:40 -0800 Ross Vandegrift said: > > > On Sat, Feb 15, 2020 at 09:37:59PM -0800, Jose R R wrote: > > > > For EFL, I replaced libcurl4-gnutls-de

Re: [E-devel] Debian Sid (Unstable) packagings for efl-1.23.3 and E23 e17_0.23.1

2020-02-17 Thread Ross Vandegrift
On Mon, Feb 17, 2020 at 09:41:48AM +, Carsten Haitzler wrote: > On Sun, 16 Feb 2020 22:37:40 -0800 Ross Vandegrift said: > > On Sat, Feb 15, 2020 at 09:37:59PM -0800, Jose R R wrote: > > > For EFL, I replaced libcurl4-gnutls-dev with libcurl4-openssl-dev to > > > be consistent with most of wha

Re: [E-devel] Debian Sid (Unstable) packagings for efl-1.23.3 and E23 e17_0.23.1

2020-02-17 Thread The Rasterman
On Sun, 16 Feb 2020 22:37:40 -0800 Ross Vandegrift said: > Hi Jose, > > On Sat, Feb 15, 2020 at 09:37:59PM -0800, Jose R R wrote: > > For EFL, I replaced libcurl4-gnutls-dev with libcurl4-openssl-dev to > > be consistent with most of what I build --including reiser4 VMs for > > Google cloud env.

Re: [E-devel] Debian Sid (Unstable) packagings for efl-1.23.3 and E23 e17_0.23.1

2020-02-16 Thread Ross Vandegrift
Hi Jose, On Sat, Feb 15, 2020 at 09:37:59PM -0800, Jose R R wrote: > For EFL, I replaced libcurl4-gnutls-dev with libcurl4-openssl-dev to > be consistent with most of what I build --including reiser4 VMs for > Google cloud env.. > The build finished but the logs showed *many* dh-missing files the

[E-devel] Debian Sid (Unstable) packagings for efl-1.23.3 and E23 e17_0.23.1

2020-02-15 Thread Jose R R
Niltze, all- So I wanted to upgrade to the latest Enlightenment < https://www.enlightenment.org/ >, for my reiser4 daily dev...er, lego building, environment. I am on a Buster backports reiser4 -based custom operating system and that meant Buster packages were behind my current E23.0 level. I had

[E-devel] Debian packaging files

2013-09-17 Thread Jorge Luis Zapata Muga
Hi all, I'm looking for the debian packaging files (debian/rules, debian/control, etc) used on the https://launchpad.net/~efl ppa. Does anyone know where are they? Regards -- LIMITED TIME SALE - Full Year of Microsoft Trai

Re: [E-devel] debian dirs in svn

2010-11-06 Thread Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
On Saturday, November 6, 2010, Mike Blumenkrantz wrote: > Can these be deleted since they haven't been updated in a few years? +1, go for it. That should never be in each lub/app anyway. The correct way would be a packaging/debian, but the maintainers (albin at least) uses an external repo for it

[E-devel] debian dirs in svn

2010-11-06 Thread Mike Blumenkrantz
Can these be deleted since they haven't been updated in a few years? -- Mike Blumenkrantz Zentific: Our boolean values are huge. -- The Next 800 Companies to Lead America's Growth: New Video Whitepaper David G. Thomson,

[E-devel] debian package building

2010-11-06 Thread Maikel Punie
hi, i was trying to build the Debian packages for efl and e, but there are some errors in the control files, for example for eina/debian/control i made the following changes: igor:~/e/trunk/eina# svn diff debian/control Index: debian/control =

Re: [E-devel] Debian files in CVS

2008-03-20 Thread The Rasterman
On Wed, 19 Mar 2008 16:36:27 +0100 "Falko Schmidt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled: no objections here :) > Hello everyone, > > I've been responsible for the CVS commits regarding Debian packaging > since about two years. The PkgE Debian Team > (http://wiki.debian.org/PkgE) is about to upload or alr

Re: [E-devel] [Pkg-e-devel] Debian files in CVS and Pkg-E

2008-03-19 Thread Niv Sardi
Jan Luebbe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> The changes would include a much better (and Debian policy compliant) >> packaging although I would stick to the one-package-per-module method >> (as it can be found in evas, for example). > > We are grouping the modules together if they have similar runtim

Re: [E-devel] Debian files in CVS and Pkg-E

2008-03-19 Thread Falko Schmidt
Hi Jan, On Wed, Mar 19, 2008 at 6:57 PM, Jan Luebbe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Falko, > > On Wed, 2008-03-19 at 16:36 +0100, Falko Schmidt wrote: > > The PkgE Debian Team (http://wiki.debian.org/PkgE) is about to upload > > or already uploading some EFL packages to Debian experimental. > >

Re: [E-devel] Debian files in CVS and Pkg-E

2008-03-19 Thread Jan Luebbe
Hi Falko, On Wed, 2008-03-19 at 16:36 +0100, Falko Schmidt wrote: > The PkgE Debian Team (http://wiki.debian.org/PkgE) is about to upload > or already uploading some EFL packages to Debian experimental. I'm a Member of the Pkg-E team. We are currently working on getting everything needed for e17

Re: [E-devel] Debian files in CVS

2008-03-19 Thread Blake Barnett
On Mar 19, 2008, at 8:36 AM, Falko Schmidt wrote: > Hello everyone, > > I've been responsible for the CVS commits regarding Debian packaging > since about two years. The PkgE Debian Team > (http://wiki.debian.org/PkgE) is about to upload or already uploading > some EFL packages to Debian experime

[E-devel] Debian files in CVS

2008-03-19 Thread Falko Schmidt
Hello everyone, I've been responsible for the CVS commits regarding Debian packaging since about two years. The PkgE Debian Team (http://wiki.debian.org/PkgE) is about to upload or already uploading some EFL packages to Debian experimental. Would there be any objections if I merge their changes in

Re: [E-devel] debian/rules file of ecore

2007-01-27 Thread Falko Schmidt
That's right, thanks! Falko On Sat, Jan 27, 2007 at 12:42:06PM +0800, Wang Xu wrote: > Hi list, > > It seems that ``--enable-ecore-fb'' option was missed in the last line > of ``debian/rules'' file of ecore: > > DEB_CONFIGURE_EXTRA_FLAGS := --disable-ecore-evas-dfb --disable-ecore-dfb > --ena

Re: [E-devel] debian control file of exml

2007-01-27 Thread Falko Schmidt
Thanks again :) Falko On Sat, Jan 27, 2007 at 02:45:59PM +0800, Wang Xu wrote: > Hi list, > > It seems that libxslt1-dev should also be list as build-dep package > of exml, since the configure script need xslt-config, which is > included in that package in debian sid. > > -- > Wang Xu > > ---

[E-devel] debian control file of exml

2007-01-26 Thread Wang Xu
Hi list, It seems that libxslt1-dev should also be list as build-dep package of exml, since the configure script need xslt-config, which is included in that package in debian sid. -- Wang Xu - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influ

[E-devel] debian/rules file of ecore

2007-01-26 Thread Wang Xu
Hi list, It seems that ``--enable-ecore-fb'' option was missed in the last line of ``debian/rules'' file of ecore: DEB_CONFIGURE_EXTRA_FLAGS := --disable-ecore-evas-dfb --disable-ecore-dfb --enable-ecore-fb clean:: if [ -f $(CURDIR)/../../snapshot ]; then ./autogen.sh --prefix=/usr --d

Re: [E-devel] Debian package : ecore

2006-11-22 Thread Falko Schmidt
Thanks. In CVS now. Falko On Thu, Nov 23, 2006 at 12:19:37AM +0100, N-Mi wrote: > Hi, > > In order to build Debian packages for ecore, the following line should > be removed from file e17/libs/ecore/debian/libecore0.install on CVS : > > debian/tmp/usr/share/ecore/fonts/* > > (font files have

[E-devel] Debian package : ecore

2006-11-22 Thread N-Mi
Hi, In order to build Debian packages for ecore, the following line should be removed from file e17/libs/ecore/debian/libecore0.install on CVS : debian/tmp/usr/share/ecore/fonts/* (font files have been removed 3 weeks ago) Thanks. -

Re: [E-devel] Debian package fixes

2006-09-06 Thread The Rasterman
On Wed, 6 Sep 2006 09:28:11 +0200 Jens Taprogge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled: > On Wed, Sep 06, 2006 at 07:58:10AM +0900, Carsten Haitzler wrote: > > On Tue, 5 Sep 2006 23:53:54 +0200 Jens Taprogge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > babbled: > > > > > Hello. > > > > > > I have recently build a more or less

Re: [E-devel] Debian package fixes

2006-09-06 Thread Jens Taprogge
On Wed, Sep 06, 2006 at 07:58:10AM +0900, Carsten Haitzler wrote: > On Tue, 5 Sep 2006 23:53:54 +0200 Jens Taprogge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > babbled: > > > Hello. > > > > I have recently build a more or less complete set of Debian packges of > > the EFL and certain apps. > > > > I stumbled across

Re: [E-devel] Debian package fixes

2006-09-05 Thread The Rasterman
On Tue, 5 Sep 2006 23:53:54 +0200 Jens Taprogge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled: > Hello. > > I have recently build a more or less complete set of Debian packges of > the EFL and certain apps. > > I stumbled across a few minor issues. Please find two patches attached > that fix those (one for the

[E-devel] Debian package fixes

2006-09-05 Thread Jens Taprogge
Hello. I have recently build a more or less complete set of Debian packges of the EFL and certain apps. I stumbled across a few minor issues. Please find two patches attached that fix those (one for the libs the other for the apps). Best Regards Jens Taprogge Index: evas/debian/rules =

Re: [E-devel] Debian packages for e_modules

2006-07-17 Thread Lut!n
I noticed that problem too, but it seems it happens only when building packages with dpkg-buildpacakge. I tried with debuild and pdebuild, and both ways produce packages with modules in the right directory, linux-gnu-i486, for e_modules and engage Didn't understand why, though :/ Regards Lut!n

Re: [E-devel] Debian packages for e_modules

2006-07-16 Thread Falko Schmidt
On Sun, Jul 16, 2006 at 08:02:39PM +0200, N-Mi wrote: > Hello, > > I'd like to make a suggestion on how debian packages for e_modules > should be built. > > At present, the problem is that all modules are built at once, and > package generation for all modules fails when ONE module fails to bui

Re: [E-devel] Debian packages for e_modules

2006-07-16 Thread David Seikel
On Sun, 16 Jul 2006 21:07:45 +0200 N-Mi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > David Seikel a écrit : > > > > Autotools and compiling can both benefit from their own caching > > mechanisms. > > I was about to make another post (as it doesn't apply only to > e_modules) to make a suggestion on autotools ca

Re: [E-devel] Debian packages for e_modules

2006-07-16 Thread N-Mi
David Seikel a écrit : > > Autotools and compiling can both benefit from their own caching > mechanisms. The autotools configurations are usually copied around and > tweaked rather than being written from scratch, mostly coz not many > people understand autotools. It shows, many of them are chec

Re: [E-devel] Debian packages for e_modules

2006-07-16 Thread David Seikel
On Sun, 16 Jul 2006 20:02:39 +0200 N-Mi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > At present, the problem is that all modules are built at once, and > package generation for all modules fails when ONE module fails to > build. Additionaly, autoconf/automake process is very long (I think > it's most of the time

[E-devel] Debian packages for e_modules

2006-07-16 Thread N-Mi
Hello, I'd like to make a suggestion on how debian packages for e_modules should be built. At present, the problem is that all modules are built at once, and package generation for all modules fails when ONE module fails to build. Additionaly, autoconf/automake process is very long (I think it

[E-devel] debian menu and menu-method files for e17

2006-06-07 Thread Mark Sethi
Hey, all. Noticed e17 didn't have menu-method or menu files for debian, so put these together. Hope this is useful. -Mark enlightenment.menu-method Description: Binary data enlightenment.menu Description: Binary data ___ enlightenment-devel mailin

Re: [E-devel] debian menu and menu-method files for e17

2006-06-07 Thread Mark Sethi
I was in a bit of a rush when I sent this, so I forgot to say that it (the menu-method) will generate eaps for any applications fed to it that don't already have one and put the entries in .e/e/favorite/Debian throwing an entry for the Debian directory into .e/e/favorite/.order if it's not there.

Re: [E-devel] Debian Sid, imlib2, lmlib2_loaders, debain/control

2006-05-28 Thread Falko Schmidt
On Sun, May 28, 2006 at 04:00:14PM +0200, Grzegorz Andrelczyk wrote: > Hello. > > There is dependency problem in Imlib2 and Imlib2_loadres. Both packages > are set to depend on xlibs-dev, but xlibs-dev is depreceated. Even worse > xlibs-dev was removed from repositoris probably during transition t

[E-devel] Debian Sid, imlib2, lmlib2_loaders, debain/control

2006-05-28 Thread Grzegorz Andrelczyk
Hello. There is dependency problem in Imlib2 and Imlib2_loadres. Both packages are set to depend on xlibs-dev, but xlibs-dev is depreceated. Even worse xlibs-dev was removed from repositoris probably during transition to Xorg 7.0. At least it looks like that. Now there is one package x-dev, and a

Re: [E-devel] Debian fixes

2006-04-13 Thread Falko Schmidt
On Thu, Apr 13, 2006 at 08:04:26PM +0200, Jens Taprogge wrote: > On Thu, Apr 13, 2006 at 07:59:11PM +0200, Falko Schmidt wrote: > > On Thu, Apr 13, 2006 at 05:00:31PM +0200, Jens Taprogge wrote: > > > On Thu, Apr 13, 2006 at 07:25:56AM -0700, Blake B. wrote: > > > > Thanks, though the library doesn

Re: [E-devel] Debian fixes

2006-04-13 Thread Jens Taprogge
On Thu, Apr 13, 2006 at 07:59:11PM +0200, Falko Schmidt wrote: > On Thu, Apr 13, 2006 at 05:00:31PM +0200, Jens Taprogge wrote: > > On Thu, Apr 13, 2006 at 07:25:56AM -0700, Blake B. wrote: > > > Thanks, though the library doesn't belong in the -dev package. I'll > > > add the others if someone

Re: [E-devel] Debian fixes

2006-04-13 Thread Falko Schmidt
On Thu, Apr 13, 2006 at 05:00:31PM +0200, Jens Taprogge wrote: > On Thu, Apr 13, 2006 at 07:25:56AM -0700, Blake B. wrote: > > Thanks, though the library doesn't belong in the -dev package. I'll > > add the others if someone doesn't beat me to it. > > As far as I know the .so file does belong i

Re: [E-devel] Debian fixes

2006-04-13 Thread Jens Taprogge
On Thu, Apr 13, 2006 at 07:25:56AM -0700, Blake B. wrote: > Thanks, though the library doesn't belong in the -dev package. I'll > add the others if someone doesn't beat me to it. As far as I know the .so file does belong into the -dev package since it is a symbolic link that is only used at bui

Re: [E-devel] Debian fixes

2006-04-13 Thread Blake B.
Thanks, though the library doesn't belong in the -dev package. I'll add the others if someone doesn't beat me to it. -Blake On Apr 13, 2006, at 5:11 AM, Jens Taprogge wrote: Attached please find a couple of Debian fixes. Best Regards Jens Taporgge -

[E-devel] Debian fixes

2006-04-13 Thread Jens Taprogge
Attached please find a couple of Debian fixes. Best Regards Jens Taporgge diff -u -r1.4 control --- libs/emotion/debian/control 2 Apr 2006 08:34:51 - 1.4 +++ libs/emotion/debian/control 13 Apr 2006 11:39:39 - @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@ Source: emotion Priority: optional Maintainer: Sytse Wie

Re: [E-devel] Debian packages for E17

2004-11-30 Thread Maicon Radeschi
Sorry, I beat you to it. :) deb http://soulmachine.net/debian unstable/ Has been up for a few months. Updated after how much time ? weekly ?? nice! thanks -- Maicon Radeschi [EMAIL PROTECTED] icq 53314410 msn [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- SF email is sp

[E-devel] Debian packages for E17

2004-11-30 Thread Maicon Radeschi
Hi people, From today on, I am sharing in my personal ftp, my debian packages of the Enlightenment CVS, I compile most of the CVS all week and now I am sharing this in my ftp server. I hope you like it! ftp://ftp.metalozzy.cjb.net:27// CVS2004-11-30 is the latest packages thanks -- Maicon Rade

[E-devel] debian packaging patch for efl

2004-06-01 Thread Koeppel Victor
Hi,   Here is a patch against EFL debian packaging. We got some new packages for imlib2, some version changes, embryo packages, esmart packages are back...   I hope this can be usefull for others.   Vico Yahoo! Mail : votre e-mail personnel et gratuit qui vous suit partout ! Créez votre Yahoo! M

[E-devel] debian rules broken in cvs

2004-04-24 Thread Gomes Jorge
Hi, Thanks for the job done in keeping E16 shine. I could not find any report of it in either E-devel or E-users MLs, so I thought I should report it. Not sure where It's the right place to report it to ... Well, the fact is that building a debian package from CVS is broken for some days. I seem

Re: [E-devel] debian

2003-01-15 Thread paul merchlewicz
In the past I've had so many problems with the configure, make, make install process with other programs that I'm trying to keep my system "installed by package". This is for me and me alone (even if it should take a little more to do). I guess I just noticed the debian directories there and was

Re: [E-devel] debian

2003-01-15 Thread Nathan Ingersoll
On Wed, Jan 15, 2003 at 10:11:38AM -0800, paul merchlewicz wrote: > Hi, > > I know this doesn't really have much to do with E17 itself, but I was > wondering if the debian subdirs were good enough to be able to create my own > debian packages out of with a few tweaks here or there or if I should j

[E-devel] debian

2003-01-15 Thread paul merchlewicz
Hi, I know this doesn't really have much to do with E17 itself, but I was wondering if the debian subdirs were good enough to be able to create my own debian packages out of with a few tweaks here or there or if I should just stay away from them for a while. Thanks, Paul ---