On Mon, 04 Jul 2005 16:21:05 +1000 Nick Blievers [EMAIL PROTECTED] babbled:
Aren't we talking about a really trivial patch here?
I dont have the means to test this, but something like this should work
right? (the debug logging may not, and I know nothing about XauLockAuth
and what it
Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
On Mon, 04 Jul 2005 16:21:05 +1000 Nick Blievers [EMAIL PROTECTED] babbled:
Aren't we talking about a really trivial patch here?
I dont have the means to test this, but something like this should work
right? (the debug logging may not, and I know
Aren't we talking about a really trivial patch here?
I dont have the means to test this, but something like this should work
right? (the debug logging may not, and I know nothing about XauLockAuth
and what it requires), but what is been asked for is very trivial.
Nick
eg
Index:
On Mon, 04 Jul 2005 08:55:13 +0300 Nir Tzachar [EMAIL PROTECTED] babbled:
i think he was referring to using root-squash. it's an entirely pointless
option and does not make the nfs exporting any more secure (disallowing root
access to files like it would be allowed locally is pointless as
On Mon, 2005-07-04 at 16:21 +1000, Nick Blievers wrote:
Aren't we talking about a really trivial patch here?
I dont have the means to test this, but something like this should work
right? (the debug logging may not, and I know nothing about XauLockAuth
and what it requires), but what is
the patch works.
thanks a lot.
would it be included in the cvs
---
SF.Net email is sponsored by: Discover Easy Linux Migration Strategies
from IBM. Find simple to follow Roadmaps, straightforward articles,
informative Webcasts and more!
Nir Tzachar wrote:
On Thu, 2005-06-30 at 09:38 -0500, Ibukun Olumuyiwa wrote:
Nir Tzachar wrote:
hello.
entrance have a problem with users whose home dirs reside on nfs.
if the nfs export is set to root-squash, entrance does not succeed in
creating the
authentication file (.Xauthority).
i
Of course. Since I wrote the stupid program myself, I have no idea what
the heck I'm talking about. I'd give you an answer but you don't deserve
one, so I'll let you figure it out on your own, oh wise one.
why the attitude?
have i insulted you in any way? i dont think so.
even so, i
This is getting out of hand. Please, everybody, go back to your
respective corners for some time out. We will proceed around the
same time tomorrow, hopefully with cooler heads.
Thank you.
Azundris!
---
SF.Net email is sponsored
1. You have a question. A somewhat silly one, but a question
nonetheless.
YOU consider it silly.
2. You post it to the developers list hoping for an answer.
first posted to the user list, got no answer. then posted to devel list,
got no answer. reposted, got an answer after several
On Sun, 3 Jul 2005 19:44:54 +0300 (IDT) Nir Tzachar [EMAIL PROTECTED]
babbled:
but again, if you had hundreds of users, whose work you had to keep backed
up (and allow them to restore files online), what other solution would you
use?? we use several network appliance machines, exporting
i think he was referring to using root-squash. it's an entirely pointless
option
and does not make the nfs exporting any more secure (disallowing root access
to
files like it would be allowed locally is pointless as if u are root - u can
setuid/seteuid or su to the user id u need then do
On Thu, 2005-06-30 at 09:38 -0500, Ibukun Olumuyiwa wrote:
Nir Tzachar wrote:
hello.
entrance have a problem with users whose home dirs reside on nfs.
if the nfs export is set to root-squash, entrance does not succeed in
creating the
authentication file (.Xauthority).
i guess the
Nir Tzachar wrote:
hello.
entrance have a problem with users whose home dirs reside on nfs.
if the nfs export is set to root-squash, entrance does not succeed in
creating the
authentication file (.Xauthority).
i guess the problem is it does not set it's uid at the appropriate time,
but im
14 matches
Mail list logo
