Re: [E-devel] Next EFL release cycle

2012-05-14 Thread The Rasterman
On Mon, 14 May 2012 08:51:44 +0200 Vincent Torri said: > On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 8:26 AM, Carsten Haitzler > wrote: > > We have a lot of changes going on in Elementary right now. Since people may > > submit patches relative to both trunk AND to the release, to minimize > > problems with pulling

Re: [E-devel] Next EFL release cycle

2012-05-13 Thread Vincent Torri
On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 8:26 AM, Carsten Haitzler wrote: > We have a lot of changes going on in Elementary right now. Since people may > submit patches relative to both trunk AND to the release, to minimize problems > with pulling in patches and work I think we should have a short development > cy

[E-devel] Next EFL release cycle

2012-05-13 Thread The Rasterman
We have a lot of changes going on in Elementary right now. Since people may submit patches relative to both trunk AND to the release, to minimize problems with pulling in patches and work I think we should have a short development cycle for the next release, so how about this: feature freeze july

Re: [E-devel] next EFL release cycle

2011-11-03 Thread The Rasterman
On Thu, 03 Nov 2011 11:44:18 +0200 Tom Hacohen said: > On 20/10/11 08:51, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote: > > Hey guys. time to talk of our next release cycle. this meant 1.1 of most efl > > libs (and 1.5 for eet). this means we have lots of bug fixes and new > > features here. i'm curren

Re: [E-devel] next EFL release cycle

2011-11-03 Thread Tom Hacohen
On 20/10/11 08:51, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote: > Hey guys. time to talk of our next release cycle. this meant 1.1 of most efl > libs (and 1.5 for eet). this means we have lots of bug fixes and new features > here. i'm currently talking about: > > eina > evas > ecore > embryo > edje > ef

Re: [E-devel] next EFL release cycle

2011-10-25 Thread The Rasterman
On Tue, 25 Oct 2011 12:19:31 +0200 Tom Hacohen said: > On 25/10/11 12:02, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote: > > get them in less than 2 weeks to go now :) > > Evil bastard! MUHaHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHA! -- - Codito, ergo sum - "I code, therefore I am" -- The Rasterm

Re: [E-devel] next EFL release cycle

2011-10-25 Thread Tom Hacohen
On 25/10/11 12:02, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote: > get them in less than 2 weeks to go now :) Evil bastard! -- Tom. -- The demand for IT networking professionals continues to grow, and the demand for speci

Re: [E-devel] next EFL release cycle

2011-10-25 Thread The Rasterman
On Sun, 23 Oct 2011 10:03:21 +0200 Tom Hacohen said: > On 20/10/11 08:51, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote: > > what i am proposing is that everyone finish their "pending work" for > > everything above in the first list and get all pending changes to elm > > upstream asap as well. i want to

Re: [E-devel] next EFL release cycle

2011-10-23 Thread Tom Hacohen
On 20/10/11 08:51, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote: > what i am proposing is that everyone finish their "pending work" for > everything > above in the first list and get all pending changes to elm upstream asap as > well. i want to call a "2 week merge window" for core efl (above) and then

Re: [E-devel] next EFL release cycle

2011-10-20 Thread The Rasterman
On Thu, 20 Oct 2011 14:32:32 -0200 Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri said: > On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 1:24 PM, Carsten Haitzler > wrote: > > > > On Thu, 20 Oct 2011 11:37:29 -0200 Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri > > said: > > > > > On Thursday, October 20, 2011, Carsten Haitzler > > > wrote: > > > > On Thu, 20

Re: [E-devel] next EFL release cycle

2011-10-20 Thread The Rasterman
On Thu, 20 Oct 2011 18:16:18 +0200 Nicolas Aguirre said: > 2011/10/20 Carsten Haitzler : > > Hey guys. time to talk of our next release cycle. this meant 1.1 of most efl > > libs (and 1.5 for eet). this means we have lots of bug fixes and new > > features here. i'm currently talking about: > > >

Re: [E-devel] next EFL release cycle

2011-10-20 Thread Mike Blumenkrantz
On Thu, 20 Oct 2011 18:51:36 +0200 Cedric BAIL wrote: > On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 5:35 PM, Carsten Haitzler > wrote: > > On Thu, 20 Oct 2011 15:47:08 +0200 Cedric BAIL said: > >> Yeah, another release cycle ! > >> > >> On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 8:51 AM, Carsten Haitzler > >> wrote: > >> > Hey guys

Re: [E-devel] next EFL release cycle

2011-10-20 Thread Cedric BAIL
On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 5:35 PM, Carsten Haitzler wrote: > On Thu, 20 Oct 2011 15:47:08 +0200 Cedric BAIL said: >> Yeah, another release cycle ! >> >> On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 8:51 AM, Carsten Haitzler >> wrote: >> > Hey guys. time to talk of our next release cycle. this meant 1.1 of most >> > e

Re: [E-devel] next EFL release cycle

2011-10-20 Thread Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 1:24 PM, Carsten Haitzler wrote: > > On Thu, 20 Oct 2011 11:37:29 -0200 Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri > said: > > > On Thursday, October 20, 2011, Carsten Haitzler > > wrote: > > > On Thu, 20 Oct 2011 10:19:14 -0200 Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri > > > said: > > > > > >> On Thursda

Re: [E-devel] next EFL release cycle

2011-10-20 Thread Nicolas Aguirre
2011/10/20 Carsten Haitzler : > Hey guys. time to talk of our next release cycle. this meant 1.1 of most efl > libs (and 1.5 for eet). this means we have lots of bug fixes and new features > here. i'm currently talking about: > > eina > evas > ecore > embryo > edje > efreet > e_dbus > eeze > > now

Re: [E-devel] next EFL release cycle

2011-10-20 Thread The Rasterman
On Thu, 20 Oct 2011 15:47:08 +0200 Cedric BAIL said: > Yeah, another release cycle ! > > On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 8:51 AM, Carsten Haitzler > wrote: > > Hey guys. time to talk of our next release cycle. this meant 1.1 of most efl > > libs (and 1.5 for eet). this means we have lots of bug fixes a

Re: [E-devel] next EFL release cycle

2011-10-20 Thread The Rasterman
On Thu, 20 Oct 2011 10:45:02 -0200 Gustavo Lima Chaves said: > > Looking at the scope of these items, I'd say it's at least a couple months' > > work to get elm in the kind of shape necessary to consider even a basic api > > freeze, after which point it will require even more time to fix bugs wit

Re: [E-devel] next EFL release cycle

2011-10-20 Thread The Rasterman
On Thu, 20 Oct 2011 15:55:58 +0200 Cedric BAIL said: > On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 10:41 AM, Carsten Haitzler > wrote: > > On Thu, 20 Oct 2011 04:04:38 -0400 Mike Blumenkrantz > > said: > > > >> On Thu, 20 Oct 2011 15:51:01 +0900 > >> Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote: > >> > >> > Hey guys. t

Re: [E-devel] next EFL release cycle

2011-10-20 Thread The Rasterman
On Thu, 20 Oct 2011 11:37:29 -0200 Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri said: > On Thursday, October 20, 2011, Carsten Haitzler > wrote: > > On Thu, 20 Oct 2011 10:19:14 -0200 Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri > > said: > > > >> On Thursday, October 20, 2011, Carsten Haitzler > >> wrote: > >> > On Thu, 20 Oct 2011

Re: [E-devel] next EFL release cycle

2011-10-20 Thread Cedric BAIL
On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 10:41 AM, Carsten Haitzler wrote: > On Thu, 20 Oct 2011 04:04:38 -0400 Mike Blumenkrantz said: > >> On Thu, 20 Oct 2011 15:51:01 +0900 >> Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote: >> >> > Hey guys. time to talk of our next release cycle. this meant 1.1 of most >> > efl >>

Re: [E-devel] next EFL release cycle

2011-10-20 Thread Cedric BAIL
Yeah, another release cycle ! On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 8:51 AM, Carsten Haitzler wrote: > Hey guys. time to talk of our next release cycle. this meant 1.1 of most efl > libs (and 1.5 for eet). this means we have lots of bug fixes and new features > here. i'm currently talking about: > > eina > eva

Re: [E-devel] next EFL release cycle

2011-10-20 Thread Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
On Thursday, October 20, 2011, Carsten Haitzler wrote: > On Thu, 20 Oct 2011 10:19:14 -0200 Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri > said: > >> On Thursday, October 20, 2011, Carsten Haitzler >> wrote: >> > On Thu, 20 Oct 2011 08:38:18 -0200 Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri >> > said: >> > >> >> I'd agree with disco

Re: [E-devel] next EFL release cycle

2011-10-20 Thread Gustavo Lima Chaves
* Mike Blumenkrantz [2011-10-20 04:04:38 -0400]: > On Thu, 20 Oct 2011 15:51:01 +0900 > Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote: > > > Hey guys. time to talk of our next release cycle. this meant 1.1 of most efl > > libs (and 1.5 for eet). this means we have lots of bug fixes and new > > featur

Re: [E-devel] next EFL release cycle

2011-10-20 Thread The Rasterman
On Thu, 20 Oct 2011 10:19:14 -0200 Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri said: > On Thursday, October 20, 2011, Carsten Haitzler > wrote: > > On Thu, 20 Oct 2011 08:38:18 -0200 Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri > > said: > > > >> I'd agree with discomfitor about his points. There are many widgets that > are > >> abo

Re: [E-devel] next EFL release cycle

2011-10-20 Thread Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
On Thursday, October 20, 2011, Carsten Haitzler wrote: > On Thu, 20 Oct 2011 08:38:18 -0200 Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri > said: > >> I'd agree with discomfitor about his points. There are many widgets that are >> about different themes to the same concept and could be simplified (toggle, >> check, .

Re: [E-devel] next EFL release cycle

2011-10-20 Thread The Rasterman
On Thu, 20 Oct 2011 08:38:18 -0200 Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri said: > I'd agree with discomfitor about his points. There are many widgets that are > about different themes to the same concept and could be simplified (toggle, > check, ... Selection of items...) toggle and check are actually differe

Re: [E-devel] next EFL release cycle

2011-10-20 Thread Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
I'd agree with discomfitor about his points. There are many widgets that are about different themes to the same concept and could be simplified (toggle, check, ... Selection of items...) As I said many times I'm against eina-object. Not able to explain it in details from a phone, but I can try lat

Re: [E-devel] next EFL release cycle

2011-10-20 Thread David Seikel
On Thu, 20 Oct 2011 15:51:01 +0900 Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote: > Hey guys. time to talk of our next release cycle. this meant 1.1 of > most efl libs (and 1.5 for eet). this means we have lots of bug fixes > and new features here. i'm currently talking about: > > eina > evas > ecore >

Re: [E-devel] next EFL release cycle

2011-10-20 Thread Vincent Torri
On Thu, 20 Oct 2011, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote: > On Thu, 20 Oct 2011 09:10:55 +0200 (CEST) Vincent Torri > said: > >> >> >> On Thu, 20 Oct 2011, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote: >> >>> Hey guys. time to talk of our next release cycle. this meant 1.1 of most efl >>> libs (an

Re: [E-devel] next EFL release cycle

2011-10-20 Thread The Rasterman
On Thu, 20 Oct 2011 09:10:55 +0200 (CEST) Vincent Torri said: > > > On Thu, 20 Oct 2011, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote: > > > Hey guys. time to talk of our next release cycle. this meant 1.1 of most efl > > libs (and 1.5 for eet). this means we have lots of bug fixes and new > > featu

Re: [E-devel] next EFL release cycle

2011-10-20 Thread The Rasterman
On Thu, 20 Oct 2011 04:04:38 -0400 Mike Blumenkrantz said: > On Thu, 20 Oct 2011 15:51:01 +0900 > Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote: > > > Hey guys. time to talk of our next release cycle. this meant 1.1 of most efl > > libs (and 1.5 for eet). this means we have lots of bug fixes and new >

Re: [E-devel] next EFL release cycle

2011-10-20 Thread Mike Blumenkrantz
On Thu, 20 Oct 2011 15:51:01 +0900 Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote: > Hey guys. time to talk of our next release cycle. this meant 1.1 of most efl > libs (and 1.5 for eet). this means we have lots of bug fixes and new features > here. i'm currently talking about: > > eina > evas > ecore >

Re: [E-devel] next EFL release cycle

2011-10-20 Thread Vincent Torri
On Thu, 20 Oct 2011, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote: > Hey guys. time to talk of our next release cycle. this meant 1.1 of most efl > libs (and 1.5 for eet). this means we have lots of bug fixes and new features > here. i'm currently talking about: > > eina > evas > ecore > embryo > edje

[E-devel] next EFL release cycle

2011-10-19 Thread The Rasterman
Hey guys. time to talk of our next release cycle. this meant 1.1 of most efl libs (and 1.5 for eet). this means we have lots of bug fixes and new features here. i'm currently talking about: eina evas ecore embryo edje efreet e_dbus eeze now coming AFTER this we want elementary to go 1.0 - so this