On Sun, 2003-07-13 at 22:25, Kim Woelders wrote:
> Morten Nilsen wrote:
> > if configure is run without parameters, prefix is set to /usr/local
> > enlightenment expects it's binaries to be in prefix/enlightenment/bin,
> > while they get installed in prefix/bin
> >
> > giving configure --enable-fs
If I understand correctly, you want
configure --enable-fsstd --prefix=/opt
and
configure --enable-fsstd (i.e. --prefix=/usr/local)
which are both fsstd?
What I suggest is to make --enable-fsstd implied so that the
configuration wrt. install dirs is the same as in every other
package in the unive
On Monday, 14 July 2003, at 19:46:22 (+0200),
Kim Woelders wrote:
> If I understand correctly, you want
>
> configure --enable-fsstd --prefix=/opt
> and
> configure --enable-fsstd (i.e. --prefix=/usr/local)
>
> which are both fsstd?
No. /opt works on the principle of /opt//{bin,lib,etc}
He wan
Does anybody actually use the non-fsstd stuff, i.e. install to
/usr/enlightenment/{bin,themes,...}?
EvilEntity Linux uses "/usr/enlightenment/" That would count for
400,000+ Enlightenment users.
-Kloss
---
This SF.Net email sponsored by
Kloss Korban wrote:
Does anybody actually use the non-fsstd stuff, i.e. install to
/usr/enlightenment/{bin,themes,...}?
>>>
>
> EvilEntity Linux uses "/usr/enlightenment/" That would count for
> 400,000+ Enlightenment users.
>
I tried using /usr/local/enlightenment, but th
On Monday, 14 July 2003, at 21:12:39 (+0200),
Morten Nilsen wrote:
> 1) ./configure
> /usr/local/bin, complains that dox is not in /usr/local/enlightenment/bin
I can't reproduce that here. Most likely a problem on your end.
Michael
--
Michael Jennings (a.k.a. KainX) http://www.kainx.org/ <[
Morten Nilsen wrote:
I tried using /usr/local/enlightenment, but that wouldn't work without
--with-fsstd either...
1) ./configure
/usr/local/bin, complains that dox is not in /usr/local/enlightenment/bin
2) ./configure --prefix=/usr/local/enlightenment
/usr/local/enlightenment/enlightenment/bin
3)
On Monday, 14 July 2003, at 21:42:31 (+0200),
Kim Woelders wrote:
> Now it's a question of either fixing it as it was or doing things as
> they are done in practically all other packages.
If it is indeed broken, it needs to be fixed.
Michael
--
Michael Jennings (a.k.a. KainX) http://www.kainx
Michael Jennings wrote:
> On Monday, 14 July 2003, at 21:12:39 (+0200),
> Morten Nilsen wrote:
>
>> 1) ./configure
>> /usr/local/bin, complains that dox is not in /usr/local/enlightenment/bin
>
> I can't reproduce that here. Most likely a problem on your end.
>
quite possible, that..
but stil
On Monday, 14 July 2003, at 21:50:46 (+0200),
Morten Nilsen wrote:
> quite possible, that..
>
> but still, is there really any reason not to allways have --with-fsstd?
Yes.
> As I see it, the people who want enlightenment into a separate
> folder, still can do that with --prefix...
No, they ca
On Mon, 14 Jul 2003 16:00:52 EDT, Michael Jennings <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> On Monday, 14 July 2003, at 21:50:46 (+0200),
> > As I see it, the people who want enlightenment into a separate
> > folder, still can do that with --prefix...
>
> No, they can't. FSSTD uses things like /bin, whereas
On Monday, 14 July 2003, at 16:10:39 (-0400),
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> what's wrong with ./configure --prefix=/usr/whatever/enlightenment
> and letting it tack the /bin on that?
if test "x$enable_fsstd" = "xyes"; then
ENLIGHTENMENT_ROOT=${datadir}/enlightenment
ENLIGHTENMENT_BIN
At 21:50 2003-07-14 +0200, Morten Nilsen wrote:
Michael Jennings wrote:
> On Monday, 14 July 2003, at 21:12:39 (+0200),
> Morten Nilsen wrote:
>
>> 1) ./configure
>> /usr/local/bin, complains that dox is not in /usr/local/enlightenment/bin
>
> I can't reproduce that here. Most likely a problem on
Michael Jennings said:
> On Monday, 14 July 2003, at 16:10:39 (-0400),
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>> what's wrong with ./configure --prefix=/usr/whatever/enlightenment
behaviortting it tack the /bin on that?
>
> if test "x$enable_fsstd" = "xyes"; then
> ENLIGHTENMENT_ROOT=${datadir}/enlig
On Monday, 14 July 2003, at 18:57:37 (-0400),
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Why not hold a vote and go with the majority.
This isn't a democracy. At best, it's a benevolent dictatorship. :)
raster has made it very clear in the past how he wants the default to
work. So this argument is pointless.
On Mon, 14 Jul 2003 21:45:31 -0400 Michael Jennings <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled:
> On Monday, 14 July 2003, at 18:57:37 (-0400),
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > Why not hold a vote and go with the majority.
>
> This isn't a democracy. At best, it's a benevolent dictatorshi
On Tuesday, 15 July 2003, at 12:05:34 (+1000),
Carsten Haitzler wrote:
> :-P~~~ :)
Beware the drool!
Michael
--
Michael Jennings (a.k.a. KainX) http://www.kainx.org/ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
n + 1, Inc., http://www.nplus1.net/ Author, Eterm (www.eterm.org)
--
17 matches
Mail list logo
