> Of course. Since I wrote the stupid program myself, I have no idea what
> the heck I'm talking about. I'd give you an answer but you don't deserve
> one, so I'll let you figure it out on your own, oh wise one.
why the attitude?
have i insulted you in any way? i dont think so.
even so, i apolo
On Sunday, 03 July 2005, at 10:53:11 (+0300),
Nir Tzachar wrote:
> why the attitude?
Maybe because you're acting like a dickhead? Let's review the
timeline, shall we?
1. You have a question. A somewhat silly one, but a question
nonetheless.
2. You post it to the developers list hoping
This is getting out of hand. Please, everybody, go back to your
respective corners for some time out. We will proceed around the
same time tomorrow, hopefully with cooler heads.
Thank you.
Azundris!
---
SF.Net email is sponsored b
> 1. You have a question. A somewhat silly one, but a question
> nonetheless.
YOU consider it silly.
>
> 2. You post it to the developers list hoping for an answer.
first posted to the user list, got no answer. then posted to devel list,
got no answer. reposted, got an answer after severa
Hi all,
I justed managed to embed Imlib2 into GNU TeXmacs (http://www.texmacs.org);
thanks a lot for such a nice library.
However, I encountered one small bug during the compilation of Imlib2,
which was easily fixed: I had to replace line 95
LDFLAGS = -L/usr/X11R6/lib -L$(top_builddir)/s
Nir Tzachar wrote:
You didn't insult him. You just acted as though you knew more than he
about his own program. So he decided that you could fend for
yourself. Seems perfectly reasonable to me.
well, i still think i know more than him (and you) about MY problem.
i am the most qualified p
On Sunday 03 July 2005 04:09 pm, Joris van der Hoeven wrote:
> However, I encountered one small bug during the compilation of Imlib2,
> which was easily fixed: I had to replace line 95
libtool should take care of this for you
-mike
---
SF.Net e
On Sun, 3 Jul 2005 19:44:54 +0300 (IDT) Nir Tzachar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
babbled:
> but again, if you had hundreds of users, whose work you had to keep backed
> up (and allow them to restore files online), what other solution would you
> use?? we use several network appliance machines, exporting
On Sun, 3 Jul 2005 22:09:27 +0200 Joris van der Hoeven <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
babbled:
> Hi all,
>
> I justed managed to embed Imlib2 into GNU TeXmacs (http://www.texmacs.org);
> thanks a lot for such a nice library.
>
> However, I encountered one small bug during the compilation of Imlib2,
> which
methinks we need to do some validation and fixing... i did a chunk today. we're
halt xhtml/html - the gui html editor in rectang half outputs xhtml and half
html.. :( also all the spans covering each page are illegal. need to remove
them. some unclosed tags too.. :)
http://validator.w3.org/check?
> i think he was referring to using root-squash. it's an entirely pointless
> option
> and does not make the nfs exporting any more secure (disallowing root access
> to
> files like it would be allowed locally is pointless as if u are root - u can
> setuid/seteuid or su to the user id u need then
Aren't we talking about a really trivial patch here?
I dont have the means to test this, but something like this should work
right? (the debug logging may not, and I know nothing about XauLockAuth
and what it requires), but what is been asked for is very trivial.
Nick
eg
Index: daemon/auth.
On Mon, 04 Jul 2005 08:55:13 +0300 Nir Tzachar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled:
> > i think he was referring to using root-squash. it's an entirely pointless
> > option and does not make the nfs exporting any more secure (disallowing root
> > access to files like it would be allowed locally is pointle
13 matches
Mail list logo
