Re: [E-devel] itask engaged - pre alpha release

2007-04-25 Thread Thomas Kuther
On Mi, 25.04.07 00:18 Simon TRENY <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, 24 Apr 2007 08:39:06 +0200, > "Igor \"FeR\" Scabini" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote : > > > Daniel Kasak ha scritto: > > > Hannes Janetzek wrote: > > > > > >> Hi, > > >> itask_ng starts to get usable. So if someone wants to try it

Re: [E-devel] itask engaged - pre alpha release

2007-04-25 Thread Simon TRENY
On Wed, 25 Apr 2007 10:18:46 +0200, Thomas Kuther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote : > On Mi, 25.04.07 00:18 Simon TRENY <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Tue, 24 Apr 2007 08:39:06 +0200, > > "Igor \"FeR\" Scabini" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote : > > > > > Daniel Kasak ha scritto: > > > > Hannes Janetzek

Re: [E-devel] Ideas for a new 'desklet'-module api

2007-04-25 Thread Simon TRENY
On Wed, 25 Apr 2007 08:07:27 +0900, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote : > On Wed, 25 Apr 2007 00:13:22 +0200 Simon TRENY <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > babbled: > > > On Tue, 24 Apr 2007 15:11:42 +0900, > > Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote : > > > > > On

Re: [E-devel] [RFC] SDL Engine

2007-04-25 Thread Simon TRENY
On Tue, 24 Apr 2007 17:33:11 -0500, "Nathan Ingersoll" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote : > On 4/24/07, Simon TRENY <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > from this: > > 1. Creation of a drawable > > 2. Creation of the GL-engine from the drawable > > 3. While (1) do { engine->render() } > > > > to this: > >

Re: [E-devel] [RFC] SDL Engine

2007-04-25 Thread Sebastian Dransfeld
Simon TRENY wrote: > On Tue, 24 Apr 2007 17:33:11 -0500, > "Nathan Ingersoll" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote : > >> On 4/24/07, Simon TRENY <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> from this: >>> 1. Creation of a drawable >>> 2. Creation of the GL-engine from the drawable >>> 3. While (1) do { engine->render() }

Re: [E-devel] [RFC] SDL Engine

2007-04-25 Thread Simon TRENY
On Wed, 25 Apr 2007 17:19:25 +0200, Sebastian Dransfeld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote : > Simon TRENY wrote: > > On Tue, 24 Apr 2007 17:33:11 -0500, > > "Nathan Ingersoll" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote : > > > >> On 4/24/07, Simon TRENY <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>> from this: > >>> 1. Creation of a d

Re: [E-devel] [RFC] SDL Engine

2007-04-25 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cedric's sdl engine email/patch has been hijacked into a bitter battle over evas and opengl :) Simon wrote: > It would indeed make the engine generic but then, if the engine > swaps the buffers by itself, the Evas couldn't be integrated in > an OpenGL application: here is how we

Re: [E-devel] [RFC] SDL Engine

2007-04-25 Thread Simon TRENY
On Wed, 25 Apr 2007 18:56:25 GMT, "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote : > > Cedric's sdl engine email/patch has been hijacked into > a bitter battle over evas and opengl :) > > Simon wrote: > > > It would indeed make the engine generic but then, if the engine > > swaps the

Re: [E-devel] WWW!

2007-04-25 Thread Luchezar Petkov
Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote: > OK... > > Ok.. As you may noticed, I've putted some content. I need your opinion on it - is it nice, are the images nice - are they too big or too small or are they nice at all. And... About the content of the site.. We need a small plan. My ideas are: 2)

Re: [E-devel] [RFC] SDL Engine

2007-04-25 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> About your second point, The gl-engine can render to a texture or a > pbuffer, there is no problem with this, as long as it doesn't swap > the buffers. But as raster said, it is not possible if we want to > get good performances with OpenGL, rendering to a texture is slow > as hell (don't know m

Re: [E-devel] WWW!

2007-04-25 Thread dan sinclair
On 25-Apr-07, at 3:05 PM, Luchezar Petkov wrote: > Ok.. > As you may noticed, I've putted some content. I need your opinion > on it > - is it nice, are the images nice - are they too big or too small > or are > they nice at all. I think their a bit on the big side. A few images are fine but I

Re: [E-devel] [RFC] SDL Engine

2007-04-25 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I wrote: > I don't know Simon.. want you want is certainly 'seductive' > in its own way - it does have a lot of good aspects -- but I wonder > if it's maybe just more gl-convenient than really necessary. On the other hand While I think that engine specific buffers, both as r

[E-devel] Bug: configure.in in exhibit, extrackt and moon not using pkg-config

2007-04-25 Thread Gaute Hope
Hello Exhibit,extrackt and moon are not using pkg-config, but *package*-config in configure scripts. As far as i can see this is outdated and does not work with current CVS. Ubuntu Feisty with easy_e17.sh: http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=97199 - gaute ---

Re: [E-devel] WWW!

2007-04-25 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Dan wrote: > > 1) Rewrite/update the user guide on get-e.org and move it in the > > official site as user documentation. It will cover ONLY e17 itself > > and the official modules (ibar, ibox, etc etc) > > We can cover other applications as we see fit. There is no reason it > has to be ju

Re: [E-devel] Bug: configure.in in exhibit, extrackt and moon not using pkg-config

2007-04-25 Thread Albin Tonnerre
On Wed, Apr 18, 2007 at 07:25:13PM +0200, Gaute Hope wrote : > Hello > > Exhibit,extrackt and moon are not using pkg-config, but *package*-config in > configure scripts. As far as i can see this is outdated and does not work > with current CVS. > > > > Ubuntu Feisty with easy_e17.sh: > http://u