Hi all.
I have a simple question about E17 architecture. Why the panel is
located within the same process as E17. When panel (or a module on it)
crashes, E17 crashes too. It resembles "explorer.exe" for me. Moreover,
some people would like to use the panel with other WMs but they can't.
Is thi
Please, no. This was intentionnaly reverted because it causes a build failure
when using tarballs created by 'make distcheck', as the debian dir is not
included in them (on purpose)
On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 03:58:05AM -0400, Enlightenment CVS wrote :
> Enlightenment CVS committal
>
> Author : hor
On Tue, 10 Jun 2008 11:18:34 +0300 Alexander Semenov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
babbled:
> Hi all.
>
> I have a simple question about E17 architecture. Why the panel is
> located within the same process as E17. When panel (or a module on it)
> crashes, E17 crashes too. It resembles "explorer.exe" for
Ok, please feel free to revert the change.
But how does debian/changelog get created?
On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 11:21:30AM +0200, Albin Tonnerre wrote:
> Please, no. This was intentionnaly reverted because it causes a build failure
> when using tarballs created by 'make distcheck', as the debian dir
On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 7:06 AM, The Rasterman Carsten Haitzler
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 10 Jun 2008 11:18:34 +0300 Alexander Semenov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> babbled:
>
>> Hi all.
>>
>> I have a simple question about E17 architecture. Why the panel is
>> located within the same process as
On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 7:54 AM, Simon Horman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ok, please feel free to revert the change.
> But how does debian/changelog get created?
this is up to the packager, as the whole debian/ folder. They should
keep a changelog of their changes... this is not the changelog of
Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 7:06 AM, The Rasterman Carsten Haitzler
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> On Tue, 10 Jun 2008 11:18:34 +0300 Alexander Semenov<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> babbled:
>>
>>
>>> Hi all.
>>>
>>> I have a simple question about E17 architectur
Build log for Enlightenment DR 0.17 on 2008-06-10 07:09:49 -0700
Build logs are available at http://download.enlightenment.org/tests/logs
Packages that failed to build:
edvi http://download.enlightenment.org/tests/logs/edvi.log
enna http://download.enlightenment.org/tests/logs/enna.log
epdf htt
Hi, all.
How to apply a transformation to a Evas object? For
example, rotate a Evas object.
Best regards.
___
雅虎邮箱，您的终生邮箱！
http://cn.mail.yahoo.com/
-
Check
Hey,
> How to apply a transformation to a Evas object? For
> example, rotate a Evas object.
rotation (other than 90, 180 or 270 degrees) is not supported in Evas
Vincent
-
Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace.
It'
On Tue, 10 Jun 2008 13:11:38 +0800 (CST) jacky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled:
> Hi, all.
>
> How to apply a transformation to a Evas object? For
> example, rotate a Evas object.
unfortunately evas has no transform feature. the best u can do is scale images.
--
- Codito, ergo sum - "
On Tuesday, 10 June 2008, at 11:21:30 (+0200),
Albin Tonnerre wrote:
> Please, no. This was intentionnaly reverted because it causes a
> build failure when using tarballs created by 'make distcheck', as
> the debian dir is not included in them (on purpose)
I still think this is a huge mistake. I
On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 5:35 PM, Michael Jennings <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tuesday, 10 June 2008, at 11:21:30 (+0200),
> Albin Tonnerre wrote:
>
>> Please, no. This was intentionnaly reverted because it causes a
>> build failure when using tarballs created by 'make distcheck', as
>> the debi
On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 10:35 PM, Michael Jennings <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Tuesday, 10 June 2008, at 11:21:30 (+0200),
> Albin Tonnerre wrote:
>
> > Please, no. This was intentionnaly reverted because it causes a
> > build failure when using tarballs created by 'make distcheck', as
> > th
On Tuesday, 10 June 2008, at 18:00:37 (-0300),
Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote:
> I'm not a packager myself, but all the packagers that I know hate
> this, and seems that it's written somewhere in debian packager docs
> that debian/ folders should not be part of the project.
That's fine for the De
On Tuesday, 10 June 2008, at 23:13:21 (+0200),
Falko Schmidt wrote:
> Nevertheless, the base directory should be free of Debian files or
> references to them (especially ./Makefile.am and ./configure.in) as
> that breaks make distcheck for packagers which use different debian
> directories as Albi
On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 02:13:32PM -0700, Michael Jennings wrote :
> On Tuesday, 10 June 2008, at 18:00:37 (-0300),
> Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote:
>
> > I'm not a packager myself, but all the packagers that I know hate
> > this, and seems that it's written somewhere in debian packager docs
> >
On Tuesday, 10 June 2008, at 23:46:04 (+0200),
Albin Tonnerre wrote:
> If people want to do this, they *are* able to: all they need is
> checking out the CVS, which contains the debian dirs.
Sorry, I meant tarballs, not CVS. The result of "make dist" or "make
distcheck" should be suitable for bu
On Tue, 10 Jun 2008 18:00:37 -0700 Michael Jennings <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled:
one way, or another, we tried to help debian packaging by providing the stuff
they need. they soundly rejected our help as unhelpful to them. after much
bemoaning on their part of it being a pain, we agree dot keep de
On Wednesday, 11 June 2008, at 09:12:16 (+0800),
Carsten Haitzler wrote:
> one way, or another, we tried to help debian packaging by providing
> the stuff they need. they soundly rejected our help as unhelpful to
> them. after much bemoaning on their part of it being a pain, we
> agree dot keep de
On Tue, 10 Jun 2008 18:17:23 -0700 Michael Jennings <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled:
> On Wednesday, 11 June 2008, at 09:12:16 (+0800),
> Carsten Haitzler wrote:
>
> > one way, or another, we tried to help debian packaging by providing
> > the stuff they need. they soundly rejected our help as unhelp
On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 01:35:22PM -0700, Michael Jennings wrote:
> On Tuesday, 10 June 2008, at 11:21:30 (+0200),
> Albin Tonnerre wrote:
>
> > Please, no. This was intentionnaly reverted because it causes a
> > build failure when using tarballs created by 'make distcheck', as
> > the debian dir
On Wed, 11 Jun 2008 14:57:20 +1000 Simon Horman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled:
> On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 01:35:22PM -0700, Michael Jennings wrote:
> > On Tuesday, 10 June 2008, at 11:21:30 (+0200),
> > Albin Tonnerre wrote:
> >
> > > Please, no. This was intentionnaly reverted because it causes a
>
On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 02:57:20PM +1000, Simon Horman wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 01:35:22PM -0700, Michael Jennings wrote:
> > On Tuesday, 10 June 2008, at 11:21:30 (+0200),
> > Albin Tonnerre wrote:
> >
> > > Please, no. This was intentionnaly reverted because it causes a
> > > build failu
On Wed, 11 Jun 2008 15:12:21 +1000 Simon Horman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled:
> >From reading Raster's comments, I gleen that the idea is basically to
> leave the debian/ directroes in CVS, generally speaking containing
> a changelog.in but no changelog. And not distributing the debian/
> director
On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 01:40:37PM +0800, Carsten Haitzler wrote:
> On Wed, 11 Jun 2008 15:12:21 +1000 Simon Horman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled:
>
>
> > >From reading Raster's comments, I gleen that the idea is basically to
> > leave the debian/ directroes in CVS, generally speaking containing
>
26 matches
Mail list logo
