-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, 24 Jul 2008 00:55:54 +0300
"Viktor Kojouharov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> regarding the xml parser, why not use exml, if it is maintained at
> all. since it is in cvs, it's most likely a dependency for something
> else already.
I choose lib
On Thu, 24 Jul 2008, Massimiliano Calamelli wrote:
> I choose libxml instead of exml because exml doesn't provide a SAX
> parser, but only a DOM parser, and i prefer the first one.
and expat ?
Vincent
-
This SF.Net email
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, 24 Jul 2008 03:11:11 +0200
"Sevcsik András" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think it would be a good idea to create an evas smart object which
> contains the whole exchange client, so devs could easily integrate it in
> their apps' GUI, and it
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 23 Jul 2008 19:37:32 -0400
"Sthithaprajna Garapaty" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This is what I think the Exchange Library should be able to do:
>
> - Register new users & Login/Logout.
> - Retrieve a list of themes
> - This list can be f
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, 24 Jul 2008 10:10:56 +0200 (CEST)
Vincent Torri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> and expat ?
>
> Vincent
Never used, so no knowledge, but if you think/know that it provides
same features/facilities of libxml i can check it.
Massimiliano
- --
M
- "Massimiliano Calamelli" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ha scritto:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Thu, 24 Jul 2008 03:11:11 +0200
> "Sevcsik András" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I think it would be a good idea to create an evas smart object
> which
> > contains the who
On Tue, Jul 22, 2008 at 4:19 PM, Jose Gonzalez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Cedric wrote:
>> On Tue, Jul 22, 2008 at 2:33 PM, Jose Gonzalez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> What are the reasons people prefer one type of license over another..
>>> and does that affect the number or quality of con
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, 24 Jul 2008 13:52:27 +0200 (CEST)
Dave Andreoli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I can do this smart object for you. One of the first apps I wrote using
> edje was a clone of gnome-art, I nener finished the app but I have a great
> edje file for t
Hello,
I have updated the archive I posted before and provided the same package for
Eet. And again I'd like to ask you to examine them and post any notes if you
have.
Here are they:
http://sionix.pbwiki.com/f/Evil_win32.zip
http://sionix.pbwiki.com/f/Eet_win32.zip
Both should be unpacked to t
On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 8:57 AM, Cedric BAIL <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 22, 2008 at 4:19 PM, Jose Gonzalez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Smarter or not.. again, who really knows. Companies make their choices,
>> individuals make theirs.. each based on whatever set of reasons. Some
Build log for Enlightenment DR 0.17 on 2008-07-24 07:11:01 -0700
Build logs are available at http://download.enlightenment.org/tests/logs
Packages that failed to build:
enna http://download.enlightenment.org/tests/logs/enna.log
epdf http://download.enlightenment.org/tests/logs/epdf.log
Packages
On Mon, 21 Jul 2008 13:45:47 +0200 "Jorge Luis Zapata Muga"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled:
> Hi all,
>
> I dont pretend to start a flamewar, if you do, please dont answer this
> thread.The thing is that right now, the EFL has arrived to a place
> where different companies are using this software, a
On Tue, 22 Jul 2008 13:20:07 -0400 Jose Gonzalez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled:
> I'm not sure that the 'majority of the work' was done by people who
> *like* that license, not for every sub-project.. or even if partly so,
> whether that will continue to be the case -- or more to the point, w
On Tue, 22 Jul 2008 14:44:23 +0200 "Cedric BAIL" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled:
> On Tue, Jul 22, 2008 at 2:33 PM, Jose Gonzalez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > What are the reasons people prefer one type of license over another..
> > and does that affect the number or quality of contributors or
On Tue, 22 Jul 2008 08:33:13 -0400 Jose Gonzalez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled:
> Ah yes, the licensing issue. Is it something which has helped or
> hindered the "E" project? Who knows. There are several other factors besides
> that one which one could point to as well, it's possible those may
On Thu, 24 Jul 2008 13:57:10 +0200 "Cedric BAIL" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled:
just to summaries - i am not in agrement lgpl will help over bsd, BUT... i also
have nothing against lgpl... i DO have a lot against gpl - in fatc qt's gpl
license drives a lot of companies to gtk (lgpl) and thus increas
On Tue, 22 Jul 2008 10:20:55 -0700 Michael Jennings <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled:
> Last time I spoke with raster about it, he still felt the same way.
> External projects and products, especially those run by commercial
> entities, are likely and welcome to use the license of their own
> choosing,
On Tue, 22 Jul 2008 16:30:04 -0500 "Nathan Ingersoll" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
babbled:
> On Tue, Jul 22, 2008 at 12:30 PM, Jose Gonzalez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > This issue is a long and complex one, and I really have no desire to
> > get into the specifics of it. You and Nathan and Car
On Mon, 7 Jul 2008 10:22:50 -0700 Michael Jennings <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled:
> On Monday, 07 July 2008, at 14:23:51 (+0200),
> Dave Andreoli wrote:
>
> > hmmm, this is a problem... we can use:
> > item: "/theme/applications" "e etk ewl";
> >
> > but then we also need multiple "application_v
On Friday, 25 July 2008, at 01:10:45 (+1000),
Carsten Haitzler wrote:
> > 3. This whole mess is a very bad idea. Handling versioned
> > dependencies is a much, much harder problem than you realize. And
> > restricting what applications are allowed to peek at a theme's
> > bits is silly. Just m
> i have to say now.. success in the open source world is utterly UNRELATED to
> what kind of open source license you use. it is a hindrance if you are not
> open. in fact GPL as a license for a library can be a hindrance. i could quote
> lots of examples - but i've been around these traps for a v
Hey,
> I have updated the archive I posted before and provided the same package for
> Eet. And again I'd like to ask you to examine them and post any notes if you
> have.
>
> Here are they:
> http://sionix.pbwiki.com/f/Evil_win32.zip
> http://sionix.pbwiki.com/f/Eet_win32.zip
>
> Both should be
On Friday, 25 July 2008, at 00:41:51 (+1000),
Carsten Haitzler wrote:
> if this is for code going into an existing application and/or
> library he is right. code is to be the same license as the existing
> tree - if it is to be a different license - it cannot go into the
> tree. this is simply sta
Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri schrieb:
> One thing I'd like to see here is the opinion of those that do most of
> the code these days, guys like englebass, dj2, pfritz and raster. You
> wrote lots of code already, and continue to do, what do you think
> about relicensing the code under LGPL?
>
>
I'm
Hi, I'mtrying to copile evil with Visual Studio 2005, but I have some
troubles :)
I think that I have found all files specified in your REAME, in fact I found
all of them in GnuWin32 sourceforge repository.
I have some problem with unistd.h, stdint.h and sys/param.h that are present
in libgw32c pa
On Thursday, 24 July 2008, at 11:50:52 (-0300),
Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote:
> I must say I agree with you, I do think the license is something
> that matters and LGPL is better for something as EFL.
"Better" in what ways? Other than simply being able to say "we're
LGPL," how does it improve
On Thursday, 24 July 2008, at 19:25:42 (+0200),
Vincent Torri wrote:
> I've learned a lot about the licences reading these mails, and it seems
> that the fact is not "such licence is a hindrance" but "such licence can
> give us developpers". That's different. So, from what i've understood, wrt
Hello!
Thank you for interest:).
Sorry for compilation problems, it is my fault.
Till today I had a plug instead of the current fnmatch, and when I placed
normal version of it I didn't try to rebuild the project from scratch, so old
.obj file was used, so I didn't see any errors:). However I co
On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 11:08 PM, Michael Jennings <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Friday, 25 July 2008, at 00:41:51 (+1000),
> Carsten Haitzler wrote:
>
>> if this is for code going into an existing application and/or
>> library he is right. code is to be the same license as the existing
>> tree -
On Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 12:20 AM, Michael Jennings <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thursday, 24 July 2008, at 19:25:42 (+0200),
> Vincent Torri wrote:
>
>> I've learned a lot about the licences reading these mails, and it seems
>> that the fact is not "such licence is a hindrance" but "such licence
Hi,
I had a similar problem and the main problem was that my dbus daemon wasn't
correctly set up. I also had a similar warning "You should just open it..."
and after edje_decc'ing it and compiling it again (and moving the new .edj
to the folder) and it worked. I don't know if this is your case (lo
On Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 1:53 AM, Jorge Luis Zapata Muga <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 12:20 AM, Michael Jennings <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > On Thursday, 24 July 2008, at 19:25:42 (+0200),
> > Vincent Torri wrote:
> >
> >> I've learned a lot about the licences reading
On Friday, 25 July 2008, at 01:53:15 (+0200),
Jorge Luis Zapata Muga wrote:
> > Assuming no one using another license ever wants to use that code.
> > If Peter writes a really badass EWL app and LGPL's or GPL's it,
> > that code could not be used in E or Evas (unless Peter himself
> > relicensed i
On Friday, 25 July 2008, at 01:53:24 (+0200),
Jorge Luis Zapata Muga wrote:
> Well, this thread has of course mutated from its original form, but
> has raised several good opinions, and in fact it has turned into
> "what do we do internally" with the efl.
I tried to point people back to your orig
On 24-Jul-08, at 5:26 PM, Peter Wehrfritz wrote:
> Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri schrieb:
>> One thing I'd like to see here is the opinion of those that do most
>> of
>> the code these days, guys like englebass, dj2, pfritz and raster. You
>> wrote lots of code already, and continue to do, what do y
On 24-Jul-08, at 1:25 PM, Vincent Torri wrote:
>> i have to say now.. success in the open source world is utterly
>> UNRELATED to
>> what kind of open source license you use. it is a hindrance if you
>> are not
>> open. in fact GPL as a license for a library can be a hindrance. i
>> could qu
36 matches
Mail list logo
