hey,
about that bug, i think that the problem is that, line 191, we try to free
l->data while l is not available anymore.
so maybe we can switch the lines 190 et 191 : free first l->data, then
remove the list item l.
what do you think ?
Vincent
--
On Mon, 19 Jan 2009, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote:
>> about that bug, i think that the problem is that, line 191, we try to free
>> l->data while l is not available anymore.
>>
>> so maybe we can switch the lines 190 et 191 : free first l->data, then
>> remove the list item l.
>>
>> what do yo
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 7:00 PM, Vincent Torri wrote:
>
> hey,
>
> about that bug, i think that the problem is that, line 191, we try to free
> l->data while l is not available anymore.
>
> so maybe we can switch the lines 190 et 191 : free first l->data, then
> remove the list item l.
>
> what do
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 9:15 PM, Vincent Torri wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, 19 Jan 2009, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote:
>
>>> about that bug, i think that the problem is that, line 191, we try to
>>> free
>>> l->data while l is not available anymore.
>>>
>>> so maybe we can switch the lines 190 et 191 :
