On Friday, 06 May 2005, at 09:49:26 (-0600),
Tres Melton wrote:
Crap! I know I edited that patch file I just forgot where I put the
edited one. Here is a fresh edit. Please ignore the last one.
Applied, thanks. :)
Michael
--
Michael Jennings (a.k.a. KainX) http://www.kainx.org/ [EMAIL
On Friday 06 May 2005 11:40 pm, Emfox Zhou wrote:
that's LGPL, not GPL.
still doesnt change the question ...
if e17 projects have been BSD, wouldnt code sharing between these projects be
invalid ... or do all e17 developers implicitly allow for other e17
developers to copy code from *GPL* e17
On Saturday 07 May 2005 03:40 am, you wrote:
According to the FSF, BSD is compatible with GPL. So, eclair can be on
GPL even if the EFL are on BSD. On the contrary, if the EFL were on GPL,
I don't think eclair could be on BSD. BSD is more permissive than GPL.
yes, as in you can import BSD code
On Saturday 07 May 2005 03:53 am, Mike Frysinger wrote:
i just see it as an annoying issue where you suddenly cant assume that you
can copy paste code from any old random e17 app into any other random e17
app
after a quick chat with Simon, why not have a general rule with e17:
- libraries are
Mike Frysinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Saturday 07 May 2005 03:53 am, Mike Frysinger wrote:
i just see it as an annoying issue where you suddenly cant assume that you
can copy paste code from any old random e17 app into any other random e17
app
after a quick chat with Simon, why not
On Sat, 2005-05-07 at 03:53 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Saturday 07 May 2005 03:40 am, you wrote:
According to the FSF, BSD is compatible with GPL. So, eclair can be on
GPL even if the EFL are on BSD. On the contrary, if the EFL were on GPL,
I don't think eclair could be on BSD. BSD is
The only reason that eke is gpl is that I wasn't paying attention when I
imported it and that was the license that autofoo stuck in there. I'll
change it to BSD when I get my internet at home back up.
dan
On 5/7/2005, Mike Frysinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Saturday 07 May 2005 03:40 am,
On Sat, 2005-05-07 at 04:17 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Saturday 07 May 2005 03:53 am, Mike Frysinger wrote:
i just see it as an annoying issue where you suddenly cant assume that you
can copy paste code from any old random e17 app into any other random e17
app
after a quick chat
Tres Melton wrote:
On Sat, 2005-05-07 at 04:17 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Saturday 07 May 2005 03:53 am, Mike Frysinger wrote:
i just see it as an annoying issue where you suddenly cant assume that you
can copy paste code from any old random e17 app into any other random
e17
Eterm devs,
PATCHES:
1. Like I suspected the 15bpp w/ saturation C shading routine flips on
too many bits in adjacent colors just like the 16bpp C routine did.
This patch corrects that behavior.
2. I'm not sure how 15bpp is defined. If the highest bit should always
be zero then there
On Sat, 07 May 2005 09:14:46 -0600 Tres Melton [EMAIL PROTECTED] babbled:
On Sat, 2005-05-07 at 04:17 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Saturday 07 May 2005 03:53 am, Mike Frysinger wrote:
i just see it as an annoying issue where you suddenly cant assume that you
can copy
Il giorno Thu, 5 May 2005 13:32:25 +0200 Massimo scrisse:
Do you use latest cvs? Here edge resitance always works.
uhmm, no!
my local build is 8 days old.
I'll try to recompile it when I'll have some time :)
I've just updated e17, but nothing changed.
I've also noticed that if I delete
On Sun, 2005-05-08 at 02:08 +0900, Carsten Haitzler wrote:
On Sat, 07 May 2005 09:14:46 -0600 Tres Melton [EMAIL PROTECTED] babbled:
On Sat, 2005-05-07 at 04:17 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Saturday 07 May 2005 03:53 am, Mike Frysinger wrote:
i just see it as an annoying issue where
On Saturday 07 May 2005 03:54 pm, Tres Melton wrote:
On Sun, 2005-05-08 at 02:08 +0900, Carsten Haitzler wrote:
On Sat, 07 May 2005 09:14:46 -0600 Tres Melton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
babbled:
On Sat, 2005-05-07 at 04:17 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Saturday 07 May 2005 03:53 am, Mike
14 matches
Mail list logo
