On 3/18/07, Kim Woelders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Clients that bother about allowed actions (typically a taskbar) should
> monitor the property and keep a local allowed actions state and not
> query the server using e.g. ecore_x_netwm_allowed_action_isset every
> time it needs the info.
Does
Hello,
The desklock's idle timer was apparently broken from the start.
Keyboard activity was not considered when determining if the user was
active or not.
Here are some patches which fix this. With these patches a persons
keyboard and mouse activity are both taken into consideration when
yes, I plan to add wpa_supplicant. But before I finish the dns/wired
network support and next the wifi.
On Sun, 2007-03-18 at 19:10 -0400, Lucian-Mircea Patcas wrote:
> Do you plan it to work with wpa_supplicant?
>
> On 3/18/07, watchwolf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, 2007-03-18 a
Le lundi 19 mars 2007, watchwolf a écrit :
> On Sun, 2007-03-18 at 17:03 -0500, Brian Mattern wrote:
> > On Sun, Mar 18, 2007 at 06:15:59PM +0100, watchwolf wrote:
> > > hello,
> > >
> > > I want present you a new application writed with etk for E17.
> > > The application can have some bugs for you
Do you plan it to work with wpa_supplicant?
On 3/18/07, watchwolf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Sun, 2007-03-18 at 17:03 -0500, Brian Mattern wrote:
> > On Sun, Mar 18, 2007 at 06:15:59PM +0100, watchwolf wrote:
> > > hello,
> > >
> > > I want present you a new application writed with etk for
On Sun, 2007-03-18 at 17:03 -0500, Brian Mattern wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 18, 2007 at 06:15:59PM +0100, watchwolf wrote:
> > hello,
> >
> > I want present you a new application writed with etk for E17.
> > The application can have some bugs for you as segv :p . The code is not
> > perfect, I need to a
On Sun, Mar 18, 2007 at 06:15:59PM +0100, watchwolf wrote:
> hello,
>
> I want present you a new application writed with etk for E17.
> The application can have some bugs for you as segv :p . The code is not
> perfect, I need to add some tests & errors outputs. The next steps,
> before add new fun
On Sun, Mar 18, 2007 at 03:29:13PM +1000, David Seikel wrote:
> Raster made this commit about two weeks ago :
>
> > a lot of patches - also my work on moving the IO stuff in e_fm to a
> > slave process to stop e from ever "locking up". this unfortunately
> > breaks the other source stuff and thus
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
watchwolf wrote:
> you can try:
> in libenm/src/ethernet.c , comment "eth_load_gateway();" in the function
> "eth_load_configuration()"
> The application will not load your gateway.
OK, I found out what's wrong:
I have the cisco VPN client installed w
By changing lines 25 and 26 of general_panel.c to
etk_combobox_column_add(ETK_COMBOBOX(pnl->cmbox_ethernet),
ETK_COMBOBOX_IMAGE, 25, ETK_FALSE, 0.5);
etk_combobox_column_add(ETK_COMBOBOX(pnl->cmbox_ethernet),
ETK_COMBOBOX_LABEL, 25, ETK_FALSE, 0.5);
I'm successfully able to run
Hey, just tried to test out your program. Unfortunatly it won't
compile due to the following error:
src/general_panel.c:26: error: too many arguments to function
'etk_combobox_column_add'
I believe this is an error due to a (very) recent API change within etk.
--ZGold
On 3/18/07, watchwolf <
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
watchwolf wrote:
> The application can have some bugs for you as segv :p
Well, and what to do if it has?
vi-edv003:/home/tuxx/enm_18_03_07/etk# ./enm
Segmentation fault
vi-edv003:/home/tuxx/enm_18_03_07/etk#
Otherwise, the screenshots look really n
Vincent Torri wrote:
> Hey,
>
> In ecore_x_netwm_allowed_action_isset (ecore_x_netwm.c), we get the atoms
> from the ECORE_X_ATOM_NET_WM_WINDOW_TYPE property. I think that we should
> use ECORE_X_ATOM_NET_WM_ALLOWED_ACTIONS. Am I right ?
>
Yes.
However, I'm not sure this function should exist
Ravenlock wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Most will probably not be bothered by this behavior. But for some
> reason it drives me crazy.
>
> It seems that when you restart E, you get all iconified applications
> added to the iconbox present on the current desk regardless of the "Show
> windows from activ
Vincent Torri wrote:
> Hey,
>
> In ecore_x_netwm_allowed_action_isset (ecore_x_netwm.c), we get the atoms
> from the ECORE_X_ATOM_NET_WM_WINDOW_TYPE property. I think that we should
> use ECORE_X_ATOM_NET_WM_ALLOWED_ACTIONS. Am I right ?
>
> Vincent
WM_ALLOWED_ACTIONS sounds proper to me...tho
Hey,
In ecore_x_netwm_allowed_action_isset (ecore_x_netwm.c), we get the atoms
from the ECORE_X_ATOM_NET_WM_WINDOW_TYPE property. I think that we should
use ECORE_X_ATOM_NET_WM_ALLOWED_ACTIONS. Am I right ?
Vincent
-
Take
16 matches
Mail list logo
