On 7/7/07, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 7/7/07, Vincent Torri [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, 7 Jul 2007, Dr. Michael 'Mickey' Lauer wrote:
Vincent Torri wrote:
On Fri, 6 Jul 2007, Enlightenment CVS wrote:
style =
Hey,
here is a patch for the compilation of engy (no more *-config scripts are
used now). I've also added math.h in a file
Nevertheless, on my computer (core2 duo, so 64 bits), the program does not
work. There are a lots of cast from a pointer to an int (from edb,
mainly, but not all).
I also suggest to have module categories, as we already use the
module.desktop files for the icons, we should use it for the categories.
This way we wouldn't have a long list, we instead have the modules more
organised in category lists.
It would be also cool to have the description directly in
2007/7/8, Vincent Torri [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hey,
here is a patch for the compilation of engy (no more *-config scripts are
used now). I've also added math.h in a file
Thanks! That was an old configure.in
Nevertheless, on my computer (core2 duo, so 64 bits), the program does not
work. There
Ok. Feeling a bit stupid... But, I'm convinced. After all, i just wanted a
few arguments. :-)
2007/7/8, Brian 'morlenxus' Miculcy [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I also suggest to have module categories, as we already use the
module.desktop files for the icons, we should use it for the categories.
This
Hi guys,
Recent discussions about config dialogs being moved to modules leads me
to a question I've been asking myself quite often recently. I'm working
on the E-project for at least a couple of years now, and actually, I
still can't tell what is the scope of this project? How would you
define
(I hope you don't mind an outsiders view on the project...)
I have been following this project since 2002 and while I'm not so
much interested in a window manager (I'm into mobile embedded
systems), I have become more and more excited about your base libraries
(including Etk and Ewl).
Luckily
Vincent Torri wrote:
no. It has been added intentionnaly. As I said in my commit message, it's
to avoid a circular dependancy.
I see, ok, thanks.
Please describe the error. It compiles, install and work fine on my
computer. Maybe I've forgotten to commit something.
Make: No rule to build
On Sun, 8 Jul 2007, Enlightenment CVS wrote:
Log Message:
epdf: make it build again by removing the plugin build (which is broken atm.).
NB: It looks like this functionality has landed in epsilon anyway, so we might
as well remove it completely.
no. It has been added intentionnaly. As I
Hey,
for the epsilon plugin of epdf, I need to export the Epsilon_Plugin. Can I
move it from epsilon_plugin.h to Epsilon.h ?
Vincent
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express
Download DB2 Express C - the FREE
Hey !
Attached a patch for e_shelf that changes the behavior of
windows witch are moved on shelf unhide :
it moves the windows just near the shelf, instead of moving them of the
shelf size offset.
Also fixed missing brackets.
If it seems ok, just tell me and i'll commit.
laurent?
I don't see a good reason not to.
On 7/8/07, Vincent Torri [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hey,
for the epsilon plugin of epdf, I need to export the Epsilon_Plugin. Can I
move it from epsilon_plugin.h to Epsilon.h ?
Vincent
/didier/rpmbuild/BUILD
+ rm -rf engage-0.0.9
+ /bin/gzip -dc /home/didier/rpmbuild/SOURCES/engage-0.0.9-20070708.tar.gz
+ tar -xf -
+ STATUS=0
+ '[' 0 -ne 0 ']'
+ cd engage-0.0.9
++ /usr/bin/id -u
+ '[' 500 = 0 ']'
++ /usr/bin/id -u
+ '[' 500 = 0 ']'
+ /bin/chmod -Rf a+rX,u+w,g-w,o-w .
+ exit 0
+ umask
Am Sun, 8 Jul 2007 15:08:28 -0700 schrieb Didier Casse:
Hi All,
Engage in current cvs fails to build and complains about a
missing *esmart*. Log attached. I believe engage has not been updated
to the recent changes.
Hello,
where could I find engage in CVS?
regards
Andreas
On 7/8/07, Simon TRENY [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi guys,
Recent discussions about config dialogs being moved to modules leads me
to a question I've been asking myself quite often recently. I'm working
on the E-project for at least a couple of years now, and actually, I
still can't tell what
В пн, 2007-07-09 в 01:50 +0300, Hisham Mardam Bey написа:
On 7/8/07, Simon TRENY [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi guys,
Recent discussions about config dialogs being moved to modules leads me
to a question I've been asking myself quite often recently. I'm working
on the E-project for at
Again, from an outsiders perspective, I thought it might be useful to
pop in a word.
With regards to being just a WM or being a full desktop environment or
being a desktop shell - you are well on your way to being a full
desktop environment. with that said, I would not have signed up for
On 7/9/07, Виктор Кожухаров [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
One of the options would be to assign a maintainer to each piece of
code in our CVS. That maintainer should obviously know the code very
well and should be able to take a decision about a feature
improvement, an addition, a patch, a
On Mon, 9 Jul 2007 01:50:44 +0300 Hisham Mardam Bey
[EMAIL PROTECTED] babbled:
Simon - I know your mail has been lingering in my inbox for a while - but since
it's out here...
On 7/8/07, Simon TRENY [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi guys,
Recent discussions about config dialogs being moved to
On 7/9/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Again, from an outsiders perspective, I thought it might be useful to
pop in a word.
With regards to being just a WM or being a full desktop environment or
being a desktop shell - you are well on your way to being a full
desktop
On 8-Jul-07, at 7:40 PM, Hisham Mardam Bey wrote:
On 7/9/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Again, from an outsiders perspective, I thought it might be useful to
pop in a word.
With regards to being just a WM or being a full desktop
environment or
being a desktop shell - you
On 8-Jul-07, at 7:35 PM, Hisham Mardam Bey wrote:
The question that I will ask again is, why do we have patches that
are several months old on our mailing list that have not been given a
yes or no yet?.
Probably because they got lost in a flood of email and the author
never popped up to
On Mon, 9 Jul 2007 02:35:15 +0300 Hisham Mardam Bey
[EMAIL PROTECTED] babbled:
On 7/9/07, Виктор Кожухаров [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
One of the options would be to assign a maintainer to each piece of
code in our CVS. That maintainer should obviously know the code very
well and should
On Sun, 08 Jul 2007 16:32:31 -0700 [EMAIL PROTECTED] babbled:
Again, from an outsiders perspective, I thought it might be useful to
pop in a word.
With regards to being just a WM or being a full desktop environment or
being a desktop shell - you are well on your way to being a full
On 8-Jul-07, at 7:43 PM, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
On Mon, 9 Jul 2007 02:35:15 +0300 Hisham Mardam Bey
[EMAIL PROTECTED] babbled:
On 7/9/07, Виктор Кожухаров [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
One of the options would be to assign a maintainer to each piece of
code in our CVS. That
On Sun, 8 Jul 2007 19:55:08 -0400 dan sinclair [EMAIL PROTECTED] babbled:
On 8-Jul-07, at 7:43 PM, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
On Mon, 9 Jul 2007 02:35:15 +0300 Hisham Mardam Bey
[EMAIL PROTECTED] babbled:
On 7/9/07, Виктор Кожухаров [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
One
On 8-Jul-07, at 7:59 PM, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
On Sun, 8 Jul 2007 19:55:08 -0400 dan sinclair
[EMAIL PROTECTED] babbled:
i swear i recently cleaned out the patches - like a few weeks back?
Actually.. .I think we need a patches mailing list...?
Can you say bugzilla? It
On 8-Jul-07, at 7:51 PM, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
Maybe we need to have official IRC logs? Maybe add a #ecode channel
whose ONLY
purpose is discussion of code, design, direction ideas etc. No help
questions -
no random discussion. Log it and put that up on-line. If you
On 7/9/07, The Rasterman Carsten Haitzler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 9 Jul 2007 01:50:44 +0300 Hisham Mardam Bey
[EMAIL PROTECTED] babbled:
Simon - I know your mail has been lingering in my inbox for a while - but
since
it's out here...
On 7/8/07, Simon TRENY [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 7/8/07, The Rasterman Carsten Haitzler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 9 Jul 2007 02:35:15 +0300 Hisham Mardam Bey
[EMAIL PROTECTED] babbled:
On 7/9/07, Виктор Кожухаров [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
One of the options would be to assign a maintainer to each piece of
code in our
On Mon, 9 Jul 2007, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
i swear i recently cleaned out the patches - like a few weeks back?
Actually.. .I think we need a patches mailing list...?
bugzilla [1] is a good way to save patches, and to report bugs. No need
for another ML.
Bugzilla is also a
31 matches
Mail list logo
