On Thu, 09 Sep 2010 23:32 -0300, "Fabiano Fidêncio"
wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 11:51 AM, Enlightenment SVN
> wrote:
> > Log:
> > fix recent menu api break
>
> Still broken here!
> SEGV when click with mouse's right button.
> At least for iBar, iBox, mixer. econnman, temperature, cpu, place
On 09/09/2010 10:32 PM, Fabiano Fidêncio wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 11:51 AM, Enlightenment SVN
> wrote:
>> Log:
>> fix recent menu api break
>
> Still broken here!
> SEGV when click with mouse's right button.
> At least for iBar, iBox, mixer. econnman, temperature, cpu, places ...
>
> Can
On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 11:51 AM, Enlightenment SVN
wrote:
> Log:
> fix recent menu api break
Still broken here!
SEGV when click with mouse's right button.
At least for iBar, iBox, mixer. econnman, temperature, cpu, places ...
Can anyone confirm?
> Author: morlenxus
> Date: 2010-0
I'm sort of changing the stuff in elm_photo with a number of FIXMEs and
hard coded numbers linking
in cnp too.
Maybe -Wno-unused-parameter?
Regards,
nash
On Thu, 09 Sep 2010 12:39 -0700, "Enlightenment SVN"
wrote:
> Log:
> some -Wall -Wextra warning cleanups.
>
> elm_cnp_helper
On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 6:23 PM, Carsten Haitzler wrote:
> On Thu, 9 Sep 2010 18:35:46 +0200 Cedric BAIL said:
>
>> On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 6:15 PM, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
>> wrote:
>> > After lots of people complaining to me at IRC, mail and others, I'd
>> > like to ask you developers to improv
On Thu, 9 Sep 2010 17:59:42 -0300 Eduardo Felipe
said:
> My company uses git-svn, with a "curated" version of EFL, internally.
> We cherry-pick fixes and only get in sync with svn HEAD on
> snapshots/releases. There's been a lot of discussion internally if we
> should publish our repository on gi
On Thu, 9 Sep 2010 15:01:46 -0300 Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
said:
> >>> As you know, a couple of weeks ago, I had a little poll [0] around.
> > As some already mentioned, I need to extend this poll by another one e.g.
> > "Which VCS would you like to use with EFL?". Still the outcomes of this
> >
On Thu, 9 Sep 2010 18:35:46 +0200 Cedric BAIL said:
> On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 6:15 PM, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
> wrote:
> > After lots of people complaining to me at IRC, mail and others, I'd
> > like to ask you developers to improve commits and particularly their
> > messages.
> >
> > 1 - The m
On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 3:01 PM, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 1:49 PM, Leif Middelschulte
> wrote:
>>
>> Am 09.09.2010 um 18:41 schrieb Cedric BAIL:
>>
>>> On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 6:35 PM, Leif Middelschulte
>>> wrote:
Hey guys,
with regards to the commit
On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 1:49 PM, Leif Middelschulte
wrote:
>
> Am 09.09.2010 um 18:41 schrieb Cedric BAIL:
>
>> On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 6:35 PM, Leif Middelschulte
>> wrote:
>>> Hey guys,
>>>
>>> with regards to the commit message part:
>>> I think it might be an idea to formalize the header of a c
On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 1:15 PM, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
wrote:
> As we're approaching a release, I'd like to ask you all, including
> Raster, to try to be kind and improve over these topics.
>
> Comments? Suggestions?
>
I agree with all the points Barbieri raised. It's much easier to
follow th
Am 09.09.2010 um 18:41 schrieb Cedric BAIL:
> On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 6:35 PM, Leif Middelschulte
> wrote:
>> Hey guys,
>>
>> with regards to the commit message part:
>> I think it might be an idea to formalize the header of a commit message and
>> make the server reject commits if necessary.
>
On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 6:35 PM, Leif Middelschulte
wrote:
> Hey guys,
>
> with regards to the commit message part:
> I think it might be an idea to formalize the header of a commit message and
> make the server reject commits if necessary.
>
> Am 09.09.2010 um 18:22 schrieb Leandro Pereira:
>> On
On Thu, 9 Sep 2010, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> After lots of people complaining to me at IRC, mail and others, I'd
> like to ask you developers to improve commits and particularly their
> messages.
>
> 1 - The most complained annoyance is by far commits that break SVN,
> makin
Hey guys,
with regards to the commit message part:
I think it might be an idea to formalize the header of a commit message and
make the server reject commits if necessary.
Am 09.09.2010 um 18:22 schrieb Leandro Pereira:
> On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 1:15 PM, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
> wrote:
>> 4 -
On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 6:15 PM, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
wrote:
> After lots of people complaining to me at IRC, mail and others, I'd
> like to ask you developers to improve commits and particularly their
> messages.
>
> 1 - The most complained annoyance is by far commits that break SVN,
> making
On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 1:15 PM, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
wrote:
> 4 - The fourth annoyance is related to the previous and is could be
> called "commit torrent" or "ssh over svn" or "gcc over svn" and is the
> result of people committing every line or test they do, then
> committing couple of chang
Hi all,
After lots of people complaining to me at IRC, mail and others, I'd
like to ask you developers to improve commits and particularly their
messages.
1 - The most complained annoyance is by far commits that break SVN,
making it unreliable for users... and if you recall we don't have
releases
On Sep 9, 2010 2:54 AM, "Brett Nash" wrote:
>> package-name-doesnt-match-soname->package-name-doesn't-match-soname
>> package-name-doesnt-match-sonames->package-name-doesn't-match-sonames
>
> That smells more like some sort of symbol rather than a typo.
>
Yes, I know.
For the patches I applied I
On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 3:35 PM, Lucas De Marchi
wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 10:08 AM, Cedric BAIL wrote:
>>> somewhere where i can port the code only once on Windows (using native win32
>>> threads)
>>
>> Agreed, so move it to eina please.
>
> But.. we are in a frozen state, aren't we?
>
On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 10:08 AM, Cedric BAIL wrote:
>> somewhere where i can port the code only once on Windows (using native win32
>> threads)
>
> Agreed, so move it to eina please.
But.. we are in a frozen state, aren't we?
Lucas De Marchi
---
On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 2:53 PM, Vincent Torri wrote:
> On Thu, 9 Sep 2010, Lucas De Marchi wrote:
>> On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 9:12 AM, Cedric BAIL wrote:
>>>
>>> This logic start to be really complex and sounds not really portable,
>>> I would advocate to move it in eina as eina_thread_priority_dro
On Thu, 9 Sep 2010, Lucas De Marchi wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 9:12 AM, Cedric BAIL wrote:
>> This logic start to be really complex and sounds not really portable,
>> I would advocate to move it in eina as eina_thread_priority_drop(void)
>
> As long as it remains correct I don't bother whe
On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 9:12 AM, Cedric BAIL wrote:
> This logic start to be really complex and sounds not really portable,
> I would advocate to move it in eina as eina_thread_priority_drop(void)
As long as it remains correct I don't bother where to put this function.
> and replace evas code als
On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 1:48 PM, Enlightenment SVN
wrote:
> Log:
> Fix priority dropping
>
> Lowering priority was wrong. Some bugs:
>
> 1) You don't lower the priority by setting the scheduler policy to some
> of the real-time ones (SCHED_RR or SCHER_FIFO). If you do so, you are
> actua
25 matches
Mail list logo