On Mon, 26 Sep 2016 14:27:01 -0300 Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
said:
> On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 4:28 AM, Jean-Philippe André
> wrote:
> > But still, despite its predictable behaviour, cancellation is hard to
> > handle properly. The guys from Android chose not
On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 4:28 AM, Jean-Philippe André wrote:
> But still, despite its predictable behaviour, cancellation is hard to
> handle properly. The guys from Android chose not to support it and use
> alternative solutions like select instead of just read.
>
> So I still
Hey,
On 24 September 2016 at 12:53, Carsten Haitzler
wrote:
> On Wed, 14 Sep 2016 01:55:42 -0300 Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
> said:
>
> as per the thread. i dislike this due to lack of portability and due to the
> major amounts of complexity there is in
On Wed, 14 Sep 2016 01:55:42 -0300 Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
said:
as per the thread. i dislike this due to lack of portability and due to the
major amounts of complexity there is in having a premeptable cacnel that can
just interrupt ANY code ANYWHERE.
imagine you are inside
On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 3:39 AM, Jean-Philippe André wrote:
> Hi Gustavo,
>
> On 21 September 2016 at 07:11, Carsten Haitzler
> wrote:
>
>> On Tue, 20 Sep 2016 12:17:50 -0300 Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
>> said:
>>
>> > On Tue, Sep 20,
Hi Gustavo,
On 21 September 2016 at 07:11, Carsten Haitzler
wrote:
> On Tue, 20 Sep 2016 12:17:50 -0300 Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
> said:
>
> > On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 11:18 AM, Carsten Haitzler >
> > wrote:
> > > On Tue, 20 Sep
On Tue, 20 Sep 2016 12:17:50 -0300 Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
said:
> On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 11:18 AM, Carsten Haitzler
> wrote:
> > On Tue, 20 Sep 2016 08:16:21 -0300 Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
> > said:
> >
> >> On Tue, Sep 20, 2016
On Tue, 20 Sep 2016 17:51:15 +0900 Jean-Philippe André said:
> Hi Gustavo,
>
> On 14 September 2016 at 13:55, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
> wrote:
>
> > HEADS UP -- BINDINGS:
> >
> > If you wish to expose the new "cancellable" property, or cope with
> >
On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 11:18 AM, Carsten Haitzler wrote:
> On Tue, 20 Sep 2016 08:16:21 -0300 Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
> said:
>
>> On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 5:51 AM, Jean-Philippe André
>> wrote:
>> > Hi Gustavo,
>> >
>> > On 14
On Tue, 20 Sep 2016 08:16:21 -0300 Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
said:
> On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 5:51 AM, Jean-Philippe André
> wrote:
> > Hi Gustavo,
> >
> > On 14 September 2016 at 13:55, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
> > wrote:
> >
> >> HEADS
On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 5:51 AM, Jean-Philippe André wrote:
> Hi Gustavo,
>
> On 14 September 2016 at 13:55, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
> wrote:
>
>> HEADS UP -- BINDINGS:
>>
>> If you wish to expose the new "cancellable" property, or cope with
>> naughty
Hi Gustavo,
On 14 September 2016 at 13:55, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
wrote:
> HEADS UP -- BINDINGS:
>
> If you wish to expose the new "cancellable" property, or cope with
> naughty users or 3rd party deps that may call
> pthread_setcancelstate(PTHREAD_CANCEL_ENABLE), please
HEADS UP -- BINDINGS:
If you wish to expose the new "cancellable" property, or cope with
naughty users or 3rd party deps that may call
pthread_setcancelstate(PTHREAD_CANCEL_ENABLE), please register your
cleanup functions with:
EINA_THREAD_CLEANUP_PUSH(cb, ctx); // will call cb() on
13 matches
Mail list logo