On Mon, 07 Jan 2008 23:21:46 +0100
Peter Wehrfritz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Kim Woelders schrieb:
Michael Jennings wrote:
On Monday, 07 January 2008, at 21:06:04 (+0100),
Kim Woelders wrote:
(and the line length is set to 80 of course :) ).
I got into the habit
On Jan 8, 2008 10:17 AM, Ethan Grammatikidis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[snip]
I find 80 columns essential for reading docs while working on code, and
for working on one file while referencing one or more others. I keep my ttys
and editors next to my browser window, or roll up the browser
On Tuesday, 08 January 2008, at 10:33:00 (+0200),
Chady Kassouf wrote:
I don't think it's a matter of tabs vs spaces as much as it is about
consistency within the source. You like spaces, someone else likes
tabs, but as long as they're consistent in the source, there's no
big problem, it's
On Jan 8, 2008 6:17 AM, Ethan Grammatikidis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 07 Jan 2008 23:21:46 +0100
Peter Wehrfritz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Kim Woelders schrieb:
Michael Jennings wrote:
On Monday, 07 January 2008, at 21:06:04 (+0100),
Kim Woelders wrote:
(and the
On Tuesday, 08 January 2008, at 17:45:56 (-0200),
Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote:
I really dislike using more than 80cols, for problems like using
OO-style programming, then just choose another language that doesn't
make you type the stupid long name every time...
Hopefully such an absurd
On Mon, 7 Jan 2008, Kim Woelders wrote:
I put that file there at a point where I got annoyed with the formatting
style mess in imlib2. The formatting style details, among other things
tabs/spaces, were set up in an attempt to minimize the overall change
caused by running indent on
Vincent Torri wrote:
On Mon, 7 Jan 2008, Kim Woelders wrote:
I put that file there at a point where I got annoyed with the formatting
style mess in imlib2. The formatting style details, among other things
tabs/spaces, were set up in an attempt to minimize the overall change
caused by
Michael Jennings wrote:
On Monday, 07 January 2008, at 21:06:04 (+0100),
Kim Woelders wrote:
(and the line length is set to 80 of course :) ).
I got into the habit of using 132 instead of 80 because 80 columns is
all too often not enough for readability, particularly when using
lengthier
Kim Woelders schrieb:
Michael Jennings wrote:
On Monday, 07 January 2008, at 21:06:04 (+0100),
Kim Woelders wrote:
(and the line length is set to 80 of course :) ).
I got into the habit of using 132 instead of 80 because 80 columns is
all too often not enough for
