Re: [E-devel] E17 BUG CALL

2012-06-29 Thread Tomas Cech
On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 01:49:57PM +0100, Michael Blumenkrantz wrote: If you have an e17 bug, reply to this mail or create a ticket for it on trac. This is the LAST call. Hint hint. Another two I almost forget: * When E17 started with `enlightenment_start -locked' it several times change

Re: [E-devel] E17 BUG CALL

2012-06-29 Thread Tomas Cech
On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 01:49:57PM +0100, Michael Blumenkrantz wrote: If you have an e17 bug, reply to this mail or create a ticket for it on trac. This is the LAST call. Hint hint. And another one: During build E_SYS_CFLAGS is not used for all suid binaries as I believe it should.

Re: [E-devel] E17 BUG CALL

2012-06-29 Thread The Rasterman
On Sat, 30 Jun 2012 01:16:59 +0200 Tomas Cech tc...@suse.cz said: On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 01:49:57PM +0100, Michael Blumenkrantz wrote: If you have an e17 bug, reply to this mail or create a ticket for it on trac. This is the LAST call. Hint hint. And another one: During build

Re: [E-devel] E17 BUG CALL

2012-06-28 Thread Michael Blumenkrantz
can you guys take this lovefest to an australian irc channel or something? this thread is for e17 bugs. On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 4:36 AM, Carsten Haitzler ras...@rasterman.comwrote: On Thu, 28 Jun 2012 10:38:12 +1000 David Seikel onef...@gmail.com said: On Thu, 28 Jun 2012 09:29:21 +0900

Re: [E-devel] E17 BUG CALL

2012-06-28 Thread Ross Vandegrift
On Wed, 2012-06-27 at 13:07 +0100, Michael Blumenkrantz wrote: tried again, still can't reproduce Hmmm, any idea what I could look at? I can reproduce on my workstation and laptop, in a normal X session or Xephyr, with a fresh profile or an existing one. I pulled 72968 to check, and it is

Re: [E-devel] E17 BUG CALL

2012-06-28 Thread Michael Blumenkrantz
no idea, you could try sending me your ~/.e I guess pager size is a known bug that will be fixed soonish, you can work around it by setting your shelf to autohide or using pager as a gadget On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 1:04 PM, Ross Vandegrift r...@kallisti.us wrote: On Wed, 2012-06-27 at 13:07

Re: [E-devel] E17 BUG CALL

2012-06-28 Thread Simon Lees
Message: 1 Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2012 09:05:09 +0100 From: Michael Blumenkrantz michael.blumenkra...@gmail.com Subject: Re: [E-devel] E17 BUG CALL Was (Re: enlightenment-devel Digest, Vol 74, Issue 135) To: Enlightenment developer list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net

Re: [E-devel] E17 BUG CALL

2012-06-28 Thread David Seikel
On Thu, 28 Jun 2012 13:10:44 +0100 Michael Blumenkrantz michael.blumenkra...@gmail.com wrote: no idea, you could try sending me your ~/.e I guess pager size is a known bug that will be fixed soonish, you can work around it by setting your shelf to autohide or using pager as a gadget On

Re: [E-devel] E17 BUG CALL

2012-06-28 Thread David Seikel
On Thu, 28 Jun 2012 23:46:39 +1000 David Seikel onef...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, 28 Jun 2012 13:10:44 +0100 Michael Blumenkrantz michael.blumenkra...@gmail.com wrote: no idea, you could try sending me your ~/.e I guess pager size is a known bug that will be fixed soonish, you can work

Re: [E-devel] E17 BUG CALL

2012-06-28 Thread Michael Blumenkrantz
it's a problem with shelf gadget redraws after my recent commit that clamped the size of a shelf to the size of the screen On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 2:50 PM, David Seikel onef...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, 28 Jun 2012 23:46:39 +1000 David Seikel onef...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, 28 Jun 2012

Re: [E-devel] E17 BUG CALL

2012-06-28 Thread Daniel Juyung Seo
fix it fix it!! this is very annoying. On Jun 28, 2012 11:17 PM, Michael Blumenkrantz michael.blumenkra...@gmail.com wrote: it's a problem with shelf gadget redraws after my recent commit that clamped the size of a shelf to the size of the screen On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 2:50 PM, David Seikel

Re: [E-devel] E17 BUG CALL

2012-06-27 Thread Michael Blumenkrantz
As I said in the ticket, you were already using an outdated version. Don't post or update tickets when you do not have the absolute latest revision of everything. I will not care about your problems if you are running old software. On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 12:11 AM, Tomas Cech tc...@suse.cz wrote:

Re: [E-devel] E17 BUG CALL Was (Re: enlightenment-devel Digest, Vol 74, Issue 135)

2012-06-27 Thread Michael Blumenkrantz
On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 5:52 AM, Simon Lees si...@simotek.net wrote: Message: 2 Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2012 10:06:47 +0100 From: Michael Blumenkrantz michael.blumenkra...@gmail.com Subject: Re: [E-devel] enlightenment-devel Digest, Vol 74, Issue 133 To: Enlightenment developer list

Re: [E-devel] E17 BUG CALL Was (Re: enlightenment-devel Digest, Vol 74, Issue 135)

2012-06-27 Thread Sebastian Dransfeld
On 06/27/2012 06:52 AM, Simon Lees wrote: * One last issue that is probably more of a missing feature then a bug but if it's easy and your working in the area maybe you could look at it otherwise i will oneday. Currently i do most of my window management with keyboard short cuts such as

Re: [E-devel] E17 BUG CALL

2012-06-27 Thread Ross Vandegrift
On Thu, 2012-06-21 at 12:46 +0100, Michael Blumenkrantz wrote: On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 12:07 PM, Ross Vandegrift r...@kallisti.us wrote: Window autoraise doesn't work with sloppy focus: 1) Same focus settings as above, plus window autoraise. 2) Open two overlapping windows on a virtual

Re: [E-devel] E17 BUG CALL

2012-06-27 Thread Michael Blumenkrantz
tried again, still can't reproduce On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 12:45 PM, Ross Vandegrift r...@kallisti.us wrote: On Thu, 2012-06-21 at 12:46 +0100, Michael Blumenkrantz wrote: On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 12:07 PM, Ross Vandegrift r...@kallisti.us wrote: Window autoraise doesn't work with sloppy

Re: [E-devel] E17 BUG CALL

2012-06-27 Thread Tomas Cech
Hi, On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 07:26:30AM +0100, Michael Blumenkrantz wrote: As I said in the ticket, you were already using an outdated version. Don't post or update tickets when you do not have the absolute latest revision of everything. Right, I had one day old GIT repository state. It takes

Re: [E-devel] E17 BUG CALL

2012-06-27 Thread Michael Blumenkrantz
My point was more that you shouldn't bother submitting a bug report unless you're sure that you are running the latest version. It saves everyone time :) On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 3:04 PM, Tomas Cech tc...@suse.cz wrote: Hi, On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 07:26:30AM +0100, Michael Blumenkrantz wrote:

Re: [E-devel] E17 BUG CALL

2012-06-27 Thread The Rasterman
On Wed, 27 Jun 2012 16:04:34 +0200 Tomas Cech tc...@suse.cz said: Hi, On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 07:26:30AM +0100, Michael Blumenkrantz wrote: As I said in the ticket, you were already using an outdated version. Don't post or update tickets when you do not have the absolute latest revision of

Re: [E-devel] E17 BUG CALL

2012-06-27 Thread David Seikel
On Wed, 27 Jun 2012 23:32:07 +0900 Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) ras...@rasterman.com wrote: On Wed, 27 Jun 2012 16:04:34 +0200 Tomas Cech tc...@suse.cz said: Hi, On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 07:26:30AM +0100, Michael Blumenkrantz wrote: As I said in the ticket, you were already using

Re: [E-devel] E17 BUG CALL

2012-06-27 Thread The Rasterman
On Thu, 28 Jun 2012 01:19:14 +1000 David Seikel onef...@gmail.com said: it TAKES me sub 1 second to do it. i do: rbe.sh thats it. that svn updates, runs make clean and make with my master makefile. it takes ME as long as it takes to type in the above command. the rest happens automatically. all

Re: [E-devel] E17 BUG CALL

2012-06-27 Thread David Seikel
Seems to not play well with XScreenSaver 5.10 (standard Ubuntu 10.04 version). Not the X screensaver that the E17 screensaver invokes (just drawing an X on the screen), but the real one. When XScreenSaver kicks in to do it's thing, it just shows a blank screen, sometime later it might actually

Re: [E-devel] E17 BUG CALL

2012-06-27 Thread David Seikel
On Thu, 28 Jun 2012 00:32:15 +0900 Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) ras...@rasterman.com wrote: On Thu, 28 Jun 2012 01:19:14 +1000 David Seikel onef...@gmail.com said: it TAKES me sub 1 second to do it. i do: rbe.sh thats it. that svn updates, runs make clean and make with my master

Re: [E-devel] E17 BUG CALL

2012-06-27 Thread Tomas Cech
On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 01:51:20AM +1000, David Seikel wrote: On Thu, 28 Jun 2012 00:32:15 +0900 Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) ras...@rasterman.com wrote: On Thu, 28 Jun 2012 01:19:14 +1000 David Seikel onef...@gmail.com said: it TAKES me sub 1 second to do it. i do: rbe.sh thats it.

Re: [E-devel] E17 BUG CALL

2012-06-27 Thread Vadim Efimov
Leif Middelschulte leif.middelschu...@gmail.com писал(а) в своём письме Mon, 25 Jun 2012 23:14:29 +0200: Am Montag, 25. Juni 2012 um 20:53 schrieb Vadim Efimov: Michael Blumenkrantz michael.blumenkra...@gmail.com (mailto:michael.blumenkra...@gmail.com) писал(а) в своём письме Wed, 20 Jun

Re: [E-devel] E17 BUG CALL

2012-06-27 Thread The Rasterman
On Wed, 27 Jun 2012 19:40:45 +0200 Tomas Cech tc...@suse.cz said: On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 01:51:20AM +1000, David Seikel wrote: On Thu, 28 Jun 2012 00:32:15 +0900 Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) ras...@rasterman.com wrote: On Thu, 28 Jun 2012 01:19:14 +1000 David Seikel onef...@gmail.com

Re: [E-devel] E17 BUG CALL

2012-06-27 Thread The Rasterman
On Thu, 28 Jun 2012 01:51:20 +1000 David Seikel onef...@gmail.com said: On Thu, 28 Jun 2012 00:32:15 +0900 Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) ras...@rasterman.com wrote: On Thu, 28 Jun 2012 01:19:14 +1000 David Seikel onef...@gmail.com said: it TAKES me sub 1 second to do it. i do:

Re: [E-devel] E17 BUG CALL

2012-06-27 Thread David Seikel
On Thu, 28 Jun 2012 08:38:36 +0900 Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) ras...@rasterman.com wrote: On Thu, 28 Jun 2012 01:51:20 +1000 David Seikel onef...@gmail.com said: On Thu, 28 Jun 2012 00:32:15 +0900 Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) ras...@rasterman.com wrote: On Thu, 28 Jun 2012

Re: [E-devel] E17 BUG CALL

2012-06-27 Thread The Rasterman
On Thu, 28 Jun 2012 10:15:00 +1000 David Seikel onef...@gmail.com said: On Thu, 28 Jun 2012 08:38:36 +0900 Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) ras...@rasterman.com wrote: On Thu, 28 Jun 2012 01:51:20 +1000 David Seikel onef...@gmail.com said: On Thu, 28 Jun 2012 00:32:15 +0900 Carsten

Re: [E-devel] E17 BUG CALL

2012-06-27 Thread David Seikel
On Thu, 28 Jun 2012 09:29:21 +0900 Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) ras...@rasterman.com wrote: On Thu, 28 Jun 2012 10:15:00 +1000 David Seikel onef...@gmail.com said: On Thu, 28 Jun 2012 08:38:36 +0900 Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) ras...@rasterman.com wrote: On Thu, 28 Jun 2012

Re: [E-devel] E17 BUG CALL

2012-06-27 Thread The Rasterman
On Thu, 28 Jun 2012 10:38:12 +1000 David Seikel onef...@gmail.com said: On Thu, 28 Jun 2012 09:29:21 +0900 Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) ras...@rasterman.com wrote: On Thu, 28 Jun 2012 10:15:00 +1000 David Seikel onef...@gmail.com said: On Thu, 28 Jun 2012 08:38:36 +0900 Carsten

Re: [E-devel] E17 BUG CALL

2012-06-26 Thread Simon Lees
Sorry about forgetting the subject on the last one. gmail doesn't make it obvious On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 5:22 PM, Simon Lees si...@simotek.net wrote: Hi All i've attempted to send this a few times over the last few days but it hasn't got through for some reason so ill try one last time. Hi,

Re: [E-devel] E17 BUG CALL

2012-06-26 Thread Tomas Cech
On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 01:49:57PM +0100, Michael Blumenkrantz wrote: If you have an e17 bug, reply to this mail or create a ticket for it on trac. This is the LAST call. Hint hint. What about illume bugs? Will you accept them as well? Tomas Cech Sleep_Walker pgpYLAQUGEPKG.pgp Description:

Re: [E-devel] E17 BUG CALL

2012-06-26 Thread Michael Blumenkrantz
In theory. On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 9:55 AM, Tomas Cech tc...@suse.cz wrote: On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 01:49:57PM +0100, Michael Blumenkrantz wrote: If you have an e17 bug, reply to this mail or create a ticket for it on trac. This is the LAST call. Hint hint. What about illume bugs? Will

Re: [E-devel] E17 BUG CALL

2012-06-26 Thread Ross Vandegrift
On Mon, 2012-06-25 at 08:50 +0100, Michael Blumenkrantz wrote: okay, fixed. Works perfectly now - thanks! Ross signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part -- Live Security Virtual Conference

Re: [E-devel] E17 BUG CALL

2012-06-26 Thread Tomas Cech
I remembered one E17 issue which is still valid. See ticket #904, please. On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 01:49:57PM +0100, Michael Blumenkrantz wrote: If you have an e17 bug, reply to this mail or create a ticket for it on trac. This is the LAST call. Hint hint.

Re: [E-devel] E17 BUG CALL Was (Re: enlightenment-devel Digest, Vol 74, Issue 135)

2012-06-26 Thread Simon Lees
Message: 2 Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2012 10:06:47 +0100 From: Michael Blumenkrantz michael.blumenkra...@gmail.com Subject: Re: [E-devel] enlightenment-devel Digest, Vol 74, Issue 133 To: Enlightenment developer list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Message-ID:

Re: [E-devel] E17 BUG CALL

2012-06-25 Thread Michael Blumenkrantz
okay, fixed. On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 7:35 PM, Sebastian Dransfeld s...@tango.flipp.netwrote: Doesn't work here either. It is a real bug. S. On 06/21/2012 08:48 AM, Michael Blumenkrantz wrote: tested here, works fine. invalid. On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 5:00 AM, Ross

Re: [E-devel] E17 BUG CALL

2012-06-25 Thread Vadim Efimov
Michael Blumenkrantz michael.blumenkra...@gmail.com писал(а) в своём письме Wed, 20 Jun 2012 14:49:57 +0200: If you have an e17 bug, reply to this mail or create a ticket for it on trac. This is the LAST call. Hint hint. Hello, May be, this is not actually bug, but very annoying

Re: [E-devel] E17 BUG CALL

2012-06-25 Thread Leif Middelschulte
Am Montag, 25. Juni 2012 um 20:53 schrieb Vadim Efimov: Michael Blumenkrantz michael.blumenkra...@gmail.com (mailto:michael.blumenkra...@gmail.com) писал(а) в своём письме Wed, 20 Jun 2012 14:49:57 +0200: If you have an e17 bug, reply to this mail or create a ticket for it on trac.

Re: [E-devel] E17 BUG CALL

2012-06-25 Thread thomasg
On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 2:49 PM, Michael Blumenkrantz michael.blumenkra...@gmail.com wrote: If you have an e17 bug, reply to this mail or create a ticket for it on trac. This is the LAST call. Hint hint. -- Live

Re: [E-devel] E17 BUG CALL

2012-06-25 Thread The Rasterman
On Tue, 26 Jun 2012 00:45:08 +0200 thomasg tho...@gstaedtner.net said: On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 2:49 PM, Michael Blumenkrantz michael.blumenkra...@gmail.com wrote: If you have an e17 bug, reply to this mail or create a ticket for it on trac. This is the LAST call. Hint hint.

Re: [E-devel] E17 BUG CALL

2012-06-25 Thread hannes.janet...@gmail.com
On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 12:45 AM, thomasg tho...@gstaedtner.net wrote: On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 2:49 PM, Michael Blumenkrantz michael.blumenkra...@gmail.com wrote: If you have an e17 bug, reply to this mail or create a ticket for it on trac. This is the LAST call. Hint hint.

Re: [E-devel] E17 BUG CALL

2012-06-21 Thread Michael Blumenkrantz
tested here, works fine. invalid. On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 5:00 AM, Ross Vandegrift r...@kallisti.us wrote: On Wed, 2012-06-20 at 23:35 +1000, David Seikel wrote: On Wed, 20 Jun 2012 08:18:04 -0500 Jeff Hoogland jeffhoogl...@linux.com wrote: Any chance we can make the systray less of a

Re: [E-devel] E17 BUG CALL

2012-06-21 Thread Michael Blumenkrantz
stop the crying, it's fixed On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 7:05 PM, David Seikel onef...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, 20 Jun 2012 13:06:16 -0400 Michael Hughes mary...@compuserve.com wrote: The Maximize functions got buried very deeply in the title-bar menu in the latest version. I think that there

Re: [E-devel] E17 BUG CALL

2012-06-21 Thread Michael Blumenkrantz
#3 is no longer possible. I was not able to reproduce the others. On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 6:51 PM, P Purkayastha ppu...@gmail.com wrote: On 06/20/2012 08:49 PM, Michael Blumenkrantz wrote: If you have an e17 bug, reply to this mail or create a ticket for it on trac. This is the LAST call.

Re: [E-devel] E17 BUG CALL

2012-06-21 Thread P Purkayastha
Like I mentioned #1, #2 are very hard to reproduce. You will see them only sometimes and only if you are always using e day in and day out. By using e I mean actually closing and opening windows frequently via pre-setup keybindings. It won't happen every time, but it *will* happen if you

Re: [E-devel] E17 BUG CALL

2012-06-21 Thread Michael Blumenkrantz
I'm going to blame it on urxvt since I know that it does some stupid things with focus that it shouldn't. That and I've had similar issues over time, but only with urxvt. On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 10:20 AM, P Purkayastha ppu...@gmail.com wrote: Like I mentioned #1, #2 are very hard to reproduce.

Re: [E-devel] E17 BUG CALL

2012-06-21 Thread Steve Jones
It's not only urxvt. I sometimes see it if I have a browser open with lots of tabs. Closing all the tabs together (closing the last one closes the browser) will occasionally result in the same behaviour. Ultimately, I tend to notice it if I close multiple things in quick succession. Is there

Re: [E-devel] E17 BUG CALL

2012-06-21 Thread Daniel Juyung Seo
One more report here. Suppose I use multiple Desktops with pager. When I restart E17, all gnome-terminals are moved to the current Desktop. I know xterm and terminology work well. This only happens with gnome-terminal. But there are many gnome-terminal users out there. It will be great if we can

Re: [E-devel] E17 BUG CALL

2012-06-21 Thread David Seikel
On Thu, 21 Jun 2012 08:07:56 +0100 Michael Blumenkrantz michael.blumenkra...@gmail.com wrote: stop the crying, it's fixed On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 7:05 PM, David Seikel onef...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, 20 Jun 2012 13:06:16 -0400 Michael Hughes mary...@compuserve.com wrote: The

Re: [E-devel] E17 BUG CALL

2012-06-21 Thread Ross Vandegrift
(sorry if this doubles up - thought I replied to this last night...) On Thu, 2012-06-21 at 01:51 +0800, P Purkayastha wrote: You will hate my bugs, but you asked for it ;-) To reproduce (my configuration): - Set window focus: sloppy all new windows get focus all options

Re: [E-devel] E17 BUG CALL

2012-06-21 Thread Ross Vandegrift
On Thu, 2012-06-21 at 07:48 +0100, Michael Blumenkrantz wrote: tested here, works fine. invalid. Hmmm - perhaps it is more specific then? I have a shelf in the lower right that contains only the systray module, and is set to autohide. Four apps have icons there: network manager, bluetooth,

Re: [E-devel] E17 BUG CALL

2012-06-21 Thread Michael Blumenkrantz
On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 12:07 PM, Ross Vandegrift r...@kallisti.us wrote: (sorry if this doubles up - thought I replied to this last night...) On Thu, 2012-06-21 at 01:51 +0800, P Purkayastha wrote: You will hate my bugs, but you asked for it ;-) To reproduce (my configuration): - Set

Re: [E-devel] E17 BUG CALL

2012-06-21 Thread Tom Hacohen
On 20/06/12 15:49, Michael Blumenkrantz wrote: If you have an e17 bug, reply to this mail or create a ticket for it on trac. This is the LAST call. Hint hint. One that you added today: 1. Set xchat to blink taskbar when someone writes your name. 2. Ask someone (I asked you) to write your name.

Re: [E-devel] E17 BUG CALL

2012-06-21 Thread Michael Blumenkrantz
neeext On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 12:58 PM, Tom Hacohen tom.haco...@samsung.comwrote: On 20/06/12 15:49, Michael Blumenkrantz wrote: If you have an e17 bug, reply to this mail or create a ticket for it on trac. This is the LAST call. Hint hint. One that you added today: 1. Set

Re: [E-devel] E17 BUG CALL

2012-06-21 Thread P Purkayastha
On 06/21/2012 07:07 PM, Ross Vandegrift wrote: (sorry if this doubles up - thought I replied to this last night...) On Thu, 2012-06-21 at 01:51 +0800, P Purkayastha wrote: You will hate my bugs, but you asked for it ;-) To reproduce (my configuration): - Set window focus: sloppy

Re: [E-devel] E17 BUG CALL

2012-06-21 Thread Cedric BAIL
On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 1:00 PM, Daniel Juyung Seo seojuyu...@gmail.com wrote: One more report here. Suppose I use multiple Desktops with pager. When I restart E17, all gnome-terminals are moved to the current Desktop. I know xterm and terminology work well. This only happens with

Re: [E-devel] E17 BUG CALL

2012-06-21 Thread Ross Vandegrift
On Thu, 2012-06-21 at 20:33 +0800, P Purkayastha wrote: No, nothing appears on the desktop. Mainly because I don't use desktop icons and I keep the file manager module unloaded. However, I do know that pressing escape doesn't help in my case. Your case actually sounds like a problem with

[E-devel] E17 BUG CALL

2012-06-20 Thread Michael Blumenkrantz
If you have an e17 bug, reply to this mail or create a ticket for it on trac. This is the LAST call. Hint hint. -- Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat

Re: [E-devel] E17 BUG CALL

2012-06-20 Thread Vincent Torri
Yop On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 2:49 PM, Michael Blumenkrantz michael.blumenkra...@gmail.com wrote: If you have an e17 bug, reply to this mail or create a ticket for it on trac. This is the LAST call. Hint hint. just to satisfy my curiosity, what is the purpose of that mail ? Is there some kind of

Re: [E-devel] E17 BUG CALL

2012-06-20 Thread Michael Blumenkrantz
There is no deadline. But if you have bugs that you know about, you should submit them to trac. Soon. On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 1:54 PM, Vincent Torri vincent.to...@gmail.comwrote: Yop On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 2:49 PM, Michael Blumenkrantz michael.blumenkra...@gmail.com wrote: If you have an

Re: [E-devel] E17 BUG CALL

2012-06-20 Thread Lucas De Marchi
On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 9:49 AM, Michael Blumenkrantz michael.blumenkra...@gmail.com wrote: If you have an e17 bug, reply to this mail or create a ticket for it on trac. This is the LAST call. Hint hint. ConnMan module is not working with the stable 1.0 ConnMan API. I plan to work on this when

Re: [E-devel] E17 BUG CALL

2012-06-20 Thread Jeff Hoogland
Any chance we can make the systray less of a red headed step child? Being able to place it on the desktop would be nice. On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 8:11 AM, Lucas De Marchi lucas.demar...@profusion.mobi wrote: On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 9:49 AM, Michael Blumenkrantz michael.blumenkra...@gmail.com

Re: [E-devel] E17 BUG CALL

2012-06-20 Thread Stefan Schmidt
Hello. On 06/20/2012 02:11 PM, Lucas De Marchi wrote: On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 9:49 AM, Michael Blumenkrantz michael.blumenkra...@gmail.com wrote: If you have an e17 bug, reply to this mail or create a ticket for it on trac. This is the LAST call. Hint hint. ConnMan module is not working

Re: [E-devel] E17 BUG CALL

2012-06-20 Thread David Seikel
On Wed, 20 Jun 2012 08:18:04 -0500 Jeff Hoogland jeffhoogl...@linux.com wrote: Any chance we can make the systray less of a red headed step child? The systray spec is a red headed step child by design. Not our fault, but some of us try to support that crap as well as we can. The rest of us

Re: [E-devel] E17 BUG CALL

2012-06-20 Thread Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
On Wednesday, June 20, 2012, Stefan Schmidt wrote: Hello. On 06/20/2012 02:11 PM, Lucas De Marchi wrote: On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 9:49 AM, Michael Blumenkrantz michael.blumenkra...@gmail.com javascript:; wrote: If you have an e17 bug, reply to this mail or create a ticket for it on

Re: [E-devel] E17 BUG CALL

2012-06-20 Thread Tom Hacohen
On 20/06/12 16:58, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote: How about if we copy edbus econnman to e17 and talk DBus directly. Remove the configuration dialog and add the agent. Do the config dialog externally (in python-elm it should ttake a day) Hallelujah! -- Tom.

Re: [E-devel] E17 BUG CALL

2012-06-20 Thread Pierre-Olivier Huguet
Hi, * Sometimes, when I lock my computer using CTRL+ALT+DEL and clicking on Lock, only one of my 2 screens has the lock screen appearing. The other screen still shows the windows opened on it. But it's locked (can't click anywhere). It happens sometimes when I click on Sleep... I can see it

Re: [E-devel] E17 BUG CALL

2012-06-20 Thread Michael Hughes
Fedora 16 64-bit, nVidia 8200 chip with nVidia driver. Current snapshot build, 0.16.999.70492 Some programs open windows which are taller than the screen with critical buttons off the bottom of the screen. Maximize Vertically fixes it but this is not sticky. Gnome Software Update and

Re: [E-devel] E17 BUG CALL

2012-06-20 Thread P Purkayastha
On 06/20/2012 08:49 PM, Michael Blumenkrantz wrote: If you have an e17 bug, reply to this mail or create a ticket for it on trac. This is the LAST call. Hint hint. You will hate my bugs, but you asked for it ;-) To reproduce (my configuration): - Set window focus: sloppy all new

Re: [E-devel] E17 BUG CALL

2012-06-20 Thread David Seikel
On Wed, 20 Jun 2012 13:06:16 -0400 Michael Hughes mary...@compuserve.com wrote: The Maximize functions got buried very deeply in the title-bar menu in the latest version. I think that there are unnecessary levels in there. I agree with that. -- A big old stinking pile of genius that no one

Re: [E-devel] E17 BUG CALL

2012-06-20 Thread Steve Jones
I can confirm the existence of Bug 1. I've never narrowed it down beyond that which ppurka has described. Steve. On 20/06/12 18:51, P Purkayastha wrote: On 06/20/2012 08:49 PM, Michael Blumenkrantz wrote: If you have an e17 bug, reply to this mail or create a ticket for it on trac. This is

Re: [E-devel] E17 BUG CALL

2012-06-20 Thread Davide Andreoli
2012/6/20 Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri barbi...@profusion.mobi: On Wednesday, June 20, 2012, Stefan Schmidt wrote: Hello. On 06/20/2012 02:11 PM, Lucas De Marchi wrote: On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 9:49 AM, Michael Blumenkrantz michael.blumenkra...@gmail.com javascript:;  wrote: If you have an

Re: [E-devel] E17 BUG CALL

2012-06-20 Thread Vincent Torri
On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 3:58 PM, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri barbi...@profusion.mobi wrote: On Wednesday, June 20, 2012, Stefan Schmidt wrote: Hello. On 06/20/2012 02:11 PM, Lucas De Marchi wrote: On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 9:49 AM, Michael Blumenkrantz michael.blumenkra...@gmail.com

Re: [E-devel] E17 BUG CALL

2012-06-20 Thread Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 7:18 PM, Vincent Torri vincent.to...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 3:58 PM, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri barbi...@profusion.mobi wrote: On Wednesday, June 20, 2012, Stefan Schmidt wrote: Hello. On 06/20/2012 02:11 PM, Lucas De Marchi wrote: On Wed, Jun 20,

Re: [E-devel] E17 BUG CALL

2012-06-20 Thread Ross Vandegrift
On Wed, 2012-06-20 at 23:35 +1000, David Seikel wrote: On Wed, 20 Jun 2012 08:18:04 -0500 Jeff Hoogland jeffhoogl...@linux.com wrote: Any chance we can make the systray less of a red headed step child? The systray spec is a red headed step child by design. Not our fault, but some of us