On Thu, 2 Jul 2009 00:18:31 -0500 Nick Hughart mek...@mekius.net said:
I'll throw my 2c into the mix.
The current e.org is completely fubar with respect to standards. It
doesn't even contain a doctype. I won't go any further on how much of
html does not REQUIRE a doctype. plain html has
The dev site seems better (it at least has a doctype and validated
minus 1 simple error), but it's using an HTML doctype. Wake up people,
it's 2009, HTML is DEAD!
No it isn't.
Google.com, Apple.com and most other relevant business declare HTML in their
doctypes. Except from Microsoft.com
On Tue, 23 Jun 2009 01:27:45 -0300
Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri barbi...@profusion.mobi wrote:
On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 9:35 PM, Tomatomha...@gmail.com wrote:
2009/6/23 Viktor Kojouharov vkojouha...@gmail.com:
On Mon, 2009-06-22 at 09:23 -0600, Dan Kronstal wrote:
Hey folks. Not sure if anyone
On Mon, 22 Jun 2009 19:10:55 +0200 Viktor Kojouharov vkojouha...@gmail.com
said:
On Mon, 2009-06-22 at 09:23 -0600, Dan Kronstal wrote:
Hey folks. Not sure if anyone knows or cares, but in IE7 e.org has looked
like this: http://img231.imageshack.us/img231/8599/e17inie.jpg since the new
O/H Dan Kronstal έγραψε:
Hey folks. Not sure if anyone knows or cares, but in IE7 e.org has looked
like this: http://img231.imageshack.us/img231/8599/e17inie.jpg since the new
design.
Well I also use IE7 and e.org seems to render fine
http://img524.imageshack.us/img524/4261/eorg.png
E.org/dev
On Wednesday 24 June 2009 15:38:10 Kostis Kapelonis wrote:
O/H Dan Kronstal έγραψε:
Hey folks. Not sure if anyone knows or cares, but in IE7 e.org has looked
like this: http://img231.imageshack.us/img231/8599/e17inie.jpg since the
new design.
Well I also use IE7 and e.org seems to render
2009/6/23 Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri barbi...@profusion.mobi
On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 9:35 PM, Tomatomha...@gmail.com wrote:
2009/6/23 Viktor Kojouharov vkojouha...@gmail.com:
On Mon, 2009-06-22 at 09:23 -0600, Dan Kronstal wrote:
Hey folks. Not sure if anyone knows or cares, but in IE7 e.org
On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 09:06:04AM +0200, Luca De Marini wrote:
2009/6/23 Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri barbi...@profusion.mobi
On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 9:35 PM, Tomatomha...@gmail.com wrote:
2009/6/23 Viktor Kojouharov vkojouha...@gmail.com:
On Mon, 2009-06-22 at 09:23 -0600, Dan Kronstal
Hey folks. Not sure if anyone knows or cares, but in IE7 e.org has looked
like this: http://img231.imageshack.us/img231/8599/e17inie.jpg since the new
design.
Cheers
Dan
--
Are you an open source citizen? Join us for the
On Mon, 2009-06-22 at 09:23 -0600, Dan Kronstal wrote:
Hey folks. Not sure if anyone knows or cares, but in IE7 e.org has looked
like this: http://img231.imageshack.us/img231/8599/e17inie.jpg since the new
design.
Cheers
Dan
no one cares. e users will not be using IE anytime soon. and
On Mon, 22 Jun 2009, Dan Kronstal wrote:
Hey folks. Not sure if anyone knows or cares, but in IE7 e.org has looked
like this: http://img231.imageshack.us/img231/8599/e17inie.jpg since the new
design.
about that, I suggest to the website maintainers to run the HTML and CSS
validators on the
On Mon, 22 Jun 2009, Viktor Kojouharov wrote:
On Mon, 2009-06-22 at 09:23 -0600, Dan Kronstal wrote:
Hey folks. Not sure if anyone knows or cares, but in IE7 e.org has looked
like this: http://img231.imageshack.us/img231/8599/e17inie.jpg since the new
design.
no one cares. e users will
On Mon, 2009-06-22 at 19:17 +0200, Vincent Torri wrote:
On Mon, 22 Jun 2009, Viktor Kojouharov wrote:
On Mon, 2009-06-22 at 09:23 -0600, Dan Kronstal wrote:
Hey folks. Not sure if anyone knows or cares, but in IE7 e.org has looked
like this:
On Mon, 22 Jun 2009, Viktor Kojouharov wrote:
On Mon, 2009-06-22 at 19:17 +0200, Vincent Torri wrote:
On Mon, 22 Jun 2009, Viktor Kojouharov wrote:
On Mon, 2009-06-22 at 09:23 -0600, Dan Kronstal wrote:
Hey folks. Not sure if anyone knows or cares, but in IE7 e.org has looked
like this:
On Monday, 22 June 2009, at 19:48:31 (+0200),
Viktor Kojouharov wrote:
perhaps. but that could lead to even more messed-up layout
Not if it's done correctly.
Coding for Firefox and ignoring IE simply because it's what the
majority of us use is just as wrong and tyrannical as web developers
On Monday 22 June 2009 12:23:45 Dan Kronstal wrote:
Hey folks. Not sure if anyone knows or cares, but in IE7 e.org has looked
like this: http://img231.imageshack.us/img231/8599/e17inie.jpg since the
new design.
Does this happen with http://enlightenment.org/dev/?
It does not in the ie7
Look
Sent from my iPod
On Jun 22, 2009, at 12:55 PM, andres andresbl...@gmail.com wrote:
On Monday 22 June 2009 12:23:45 Dan Kronstal wrote:
Hey folks. Not sure if anyone knows or cares, but in IE7 e.org has
looked
like this: http://img231.imageshack.us/img231/8599/e17inie.jpg
since
Looks this way on ie8 maybe that's what he meant?
Sent from my iPhone
On Jun 22, 2009, at 12:55 PM, andres andresbl...@gmail.com wrote:
On Monday 22 June 2009 12:23:45 Dan Kronstal wrote:
Hey folks. Not sure if anyone knows or cares, but in IE7 e.org has
looked
like this:
2009/6/23 Viktor Kojouharov vkojouha...@gmail.com:
On Mon, 2009-06-22 at 09:23 -0600, Dan Kronstal wrote:
Hey folks. Not sure if anyone knows or cares, but in IE7 e.org has looked
like this: http://img231.imageshack.us/img231/8599/e17inie.jpg since the new
design.
Cheers
Dan
no one
On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 9:35 PM, Tomatomha...@gmail.com wrote:
2009/6/23 Viktor Kojouharov vkojouha...@gmail.com:
On Mon, 2009-06-22 at 09:23 -0600, Dan Kronstal wrote:
Hey folks. Not sure if anyone knows or cares, but in IE7 e.org has looked
like this:
20 matches
Mail list logo
