Re: [E-devel] enlightenment_remote segfaults

2009-09-09 Thread The Rasterman
On Sat, 5 Sep 2009 20:46:53 -0400 P Purkayastha ppu...@gmail.com said: you won't like this but e_remote and e's ipc are scheduled for death (removal). 1. we have a dbu api already for e, 2. this includes the core set of ops needed, 3. it's expandable by modules. the maintenance of

Re: [E-devel] enlightenment_remote segfaults

2009-09-09 Thread P Purkayastha
On Wednesday 09 September 2009 21:15:25 Carsten Haitzler wrote: On Sat, 5 Sep 2009 20:46:53 -0400 P Purkayastha ppu...@gmail.com said: you won't like this but e_remote and e's ipc are scheduled for death (removal). 1. we have a dbu api already for e, 2. this includes the core set of ops

Re: [E-devel] enlightenment_remote segfaults

2009-09-09 Thread The Rasterman
On Wed, 9 Sep 2009 22:04:35 -0400 P Purkayastha ppu...@gmail.com said: On Wednesday 09 September 2009 21:15:25 Carsten Haitzler wrote: On Sat, 5 Sep 2009 20:46:53 -0400 P Purkayastha ppu...@gmail.com said: you won't like this but e_remote and e's ipc are scheduled for death

Re: [E-devel] enlightenment_remote segfaults

2009-09-09 Thread P Purkayastha
On Wednesday 09 September 2009 22:17:48 you wrote: On Wed, 9 Sep 2009 22:04:35 -0400 P Purkayastha ppu...@gmail.com said: On Wednesday 09 September 2009 21:15:25 Carsten Haitzler wrote: On Sat, 5 Sep 2009 20:46:53 -0400 P Purkayastha ppu...@gmail.com said: you won't like this

[E-devel] enlightenment_remote segfaults

2009-09-05 Thread P Purkayastha
Hi, enlightenment_remote is giving segfaults every time it is run. This has been happening since at least September 3. This is an example output: ~ which er er: aliased to enlightenment_remote ~ er -module-list REPLY - BEGIN REPLY: gadman ENABLED 1 zsh: segmentation fault enlightenment_remote