On 13/08/11 07:04, Lucas De Marchi wrote:
> It was over discussed in the mailing list... there was no reason to
> make yet another thread with plenty of arguments for each side.
Not everyone followed/commented on those threads. I know I haven't.
Generally, I bet people that liked the way it was we
On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 3:03 AM, Tom Hacohen wrote:
>
> On 12/08/11 07:08, Mike Blumenkrantz wrote:
> > POLL OVER.
> >
> > Results:
> > 2 votes: #1 - LEAVE AS-IS, CONTINUE ADDING DOCS TO Elementary.h
> > 9 votes: #2 - SPLIT INTO WIDGET HEADERS SIMILAR TO EINA
> > 5 votes: #3 - OTHER (put docs back
On 12/08/11 07:08, Mike Blumenkrantz wrote:
> POLL OVER.
>
> Results:
> 2 votes: #1 - LEAVE AS-IS, CONTINUE ADDING DOCS TO Elementary.h
> 9 votes: #2 - SPLIT INTO WIDGET HEADERS SIMILAR TO EINA
> 5 votes: #3 - OTHER (put docs back in C files)
>
> Executive Summary:
> WINNER - #2 (SPLIT INTO WIDGE
;m...@zentific.com>
> To:
> enlightenment-de...@lists.sourceforge.netenlightenment-devellists.sourceforge.net
> Cc:
> Sent: 11-08-12(금) 13:08:07
> Subject: [E-devel] HEADER SIZE POLL RESULTS
> POLL OVER.
> Results:
> 2 votes: #1 - LEAVE AS-IS, CONTINUE ADDING DOCS TO E
rge.net
Cc:
Sent: 11-08-12(금) 13:08:07
Subject: [E-devel] HEADER SIZE POLL RESULTS
POLL OVER.
Results:
2 votes: #1 - LEAVE AS-IS, CONTINUE ADDING DOCS TO Elementary.h
9 votes: #2 - SPLIT INTO WIDGET HEADERS SIMILAR TO EINA
5 votes: #3 - OTHER (put docs back in C files)
Executive Summary:
WINNER -
POLL OVER.
Results:
2 votes: #1 - LEAVE AS-IS, CONTINUE ADDING DOCS TO Elementary.h
9 votes: #2 - SPLIT INTO WIDGET HEADERS SIMILAR TO EINA
5 votes: #3 - OTHER (put docs back in C files)
Executive Summary:
WINNER - #2 (SPLIT INTO WIDGET HEADERS SIMILAR TO EINA)
--
Mike Blumenkrantz
Zentific: Cod
On 05/08/2011, at 05:28, Lucas De Marchi wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 3:17 PM, Iván Briano (Sachiel)
> wrote:
>> Since this subject is annoying, I will also be annoying by top-posting.
>>
>> I like my docs in the .c files, and keep in the .h whatever is needed to
>> be there only. If needed,
On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 3:17 PM, Iván Briano (Sachiel)
wrote:
> Since this subject is annoying, I will also be annoying by top-posting.
>
> I like my docs in the .c files, and keep in the .h whatever is needed to
> be there only. If needed, doxygen even supports having docs in some
> other random
My vote is for #1.
I like the idea of having a single point of reference.
On 08/05/2011 07:30 AM, Mike Blumenkrantz wrote:
> On Thu, 28 Jul 2011 12:42:32 -0400
> Mike Blumenkrantz wrote:
>
>> This is a community project, so we can do stuff like having polls and taking
>> votes right? Okay then, s
Thanks stu!
I raised header separation issues a couple of times but there was no progress.
This time I hope we will get some good result.
Anyhow, I vote for #2 and #3-vtorri's.
Elementary.h is already so huge, so any solution will be still annoying.
I just choose LESS ANNOYING solution.
Thanks.
On Thu, 28 Jul 2011 12:42:32 -0400
Mike Blumenkrantz wrote:
> This is a community project, so we can do stuff like having polls and taking
> votes right? Okay then, since there's been some disagreement with strong
> opinions on either side we're voting on a super important issue - header size.
>
ghtenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Sent: 11-08-02(화) 18:50:01
Subject: Re: [E-devel] header size...On 31/07/11 16:20, Tom Hacohen wrote:
> Yeah, I know, and I think what I did should have triggered it, doesn't
> it? I also tried doing: "edje_cc ../../../tmp/../tmp/edje/bla.edc"
On 31/07/11 16:20, Tom Hacohen wrote:
> Yeah, I know, and I think what I did should have triggered it, doesn't
> it? I also tried doing: "edje_cc ../../../tmp/../tmp/edje/bla.edc" which
> also didn't trigger it.
>
> Seems to me that it's fixed now...
>
Ok, I split default.edc, according to my tes
so the topic has been changed successfully :)
i prefer separating edc as well though.
Daniel Juyung Seo (SeoZ)
On Jul 31, 2011 10:19 PM, "Tom Hacohen"
wrote:
> On 31/07/11 16:15, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
>> when using form makefiles and we have $(top_srcdir) and other such fun in
t
On 31/07/11 16:15, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
> when using form makefiles and we have $(top_srcdir) and other such fun in the
> past i found it made files that edje_decc doesnt like as all the relative
> paths
> make it think theres a security violation (try to write file outside of d
On Sun, 31 Jul 2011 11:23:02 +0300 Tom Hacohen
said:
> On 29/07/11 17:46, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
> > it already tries. :)
> >
>
> WFM.
>
> I created a dir called: /tmp/edje
> inside I created bla.edc and emo-unhappy.png.
> I created the edj using:
> edje_cc bla.edc -id ../../..
On 29/07/11 17:46, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
> it already tries. :)
>
WFM.
I created a dir called: /tmp/edje
inside I created bla.edc and emo-unhappy.png.
I created the edj using:
edje_cc bla.edc -id ../../../../tmp/../tmp/edje/
and then decompiled using: edje_decc bla.edj.
Every
On 29/07/11 17:46, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
> it already tries. :)
If at first you don't succeed, try, try, and try again...
--
Tom.
--
Got Input? Slashdot Needs You.
Take our quick survey online. Com
On Fri, 29 Jul 2011 15:01:52 +0300 Tom Hacohen said:
> On 29/07/11 14:25, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
> > edje_decc then breaks if we start using includes.
>
> That can be solved simply by normalizing the path, will take a look
> tomorrow.
it already tries. :)
--
- Cod
On 29/07/11 14:25, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
> edje_decc then breaks if we start using includes.
That can be solved simply by normalizing the path, will take a look
tomorrow.
--
Tom.
--
Got Input? Slashdo
On Thu, 28 Jul 2011 12:42:32 -0400 Mike Blumenkrantz said:
> This is a community project, so we can do stuff like having polls and taking
> votes right? Okay then, since there's been some disagreement with strong
> opinions on either side we're voting on a super important issue - header size.
> S
On Fri, 29 Jul 2011 10:15:40 +0300 Tom Hacohen said:
> On 29/07/11 03:37, Bruno Dilly wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 7:53 PM, Mike Blumenkrantz
> > wrote:
> >> On Fri, 29 Jul 2011 00:38:50 +0200
> >> Hugo Camboulive wrote:
> >>
> >>> Really you're worried about the approaching 20k lines of
On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 20:17, Iván Briano (Sachiel) wrote:
> Since this subject is annoying, I will also be annoying by top-posting.
>
> I like my docs in the .c files, and keep in the .h whatever is needed to
> be there only. If needed, doxygen even supports having docs in some
> other random fi
On 29/07/11 03:37, Bruno Dilly wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 7:53 PM, Mike Blumenkrantz wrote:
>> On Fri, 29 Jul 2011 00:38:50 +0200
>> Hugo Camboulive wrote:
>>
>>> Really you're worried about the approaching 20k lines of a header?
>>> Please have a look at the 37k lines of the default.edc...
ntz"<m...@zentific.com>
Cc: enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Sent: 11-07-29(금) 09:37:44
Subject: Re: [E-devel] header size...On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 7:53 PM, Mike
Blumenkrantz <m...@zentific.com> wrote:
> On Fri, 29 Jul 2011 00:38:50 +0200
> Hugo Camboulive <hugo.camboul..
On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 7:53 PM, Mike Blumenkrantz wrote:
> On Fri, 29 Jul 2011 00:38:50 +0200
> Hugo Camboulive wrote:
>
>> Really you're worried about the approaching 20k lines of a header?
>> Please have a look at the 37k lines of the default.edc... that baby is 1.1MB
>> of raw text, and conta
On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 12:42 AM, Mike Blumenkrantz wrote:
> This is a community project, so we can do stuff like having polls and taking
> votes right? Okay then, since there's been some disagreement with strong
> opinions on either side we're voting on a super important issue - header size.
> Sp
On Fri, 29 Jul 2011 00:38:50 +0200
Hugo Camboulive wrote:
> Really you're worried about the approaching 20k lines of a header?
> Please have a look at the 37k lines of the default.edc... that baby is 1.1MB
> of raw text, and contains every possible elementary widget. (there's a
> little differenc
Really you're worried about the approaching 20k lines of a header?
Please have a look at the 37k lines of the default.edc... that baby is 1.1MB
of raw text, and contains every possible elementary widget. (there's a
little difference with the header though : this one is made of very few
comments) :-
On 07/28/2011 12:42 PM, Mike Blumenkrantz wrote:
> This is a community project, so we can do stuff like having polls and taking
> votes right? Okay then, since there's been some disagreement with strong
> opinions on either side we're voting on a super important issue - header size.
> Specifically,
On Thu, 28 Jul 2011, Mike Blumenkrantz wrote:
> This is a community project, so we can do stuff like having polls and taking
> votes right? Okay then, since there's been some disagreement with strong
> opinions on either side we're voting on a super important issue - header size.
> Specifically,
Since this subject is annoying, I will also be annoying by top-posting.
I like my docs in the .c files, and keep in the .h whatever is needed to
be there only. If needed, doxygen even supports having docs in some
other random file, but I like headers to be as small and packed as possible
so the en
On Thu, 28 Jul 2011 20:22:51 +0300
Tom Hacohen wrote:
> On 28/07/11 19:42, Mike Blumenkrantz wrote:
> > This is a community project, so we can do stuff like having polls and taking
> > votes right? Okay then, since there's been some disagreement with strong
> > opinions on either side we're votin
As per Mikes request, moving the discussion part to this thread.
> On 28/07/11 19:42, Mike Blumenkrantz wrote:
> > This is a community project, so we can do stuff like having polls
> > and taking votes right? Okay then, since there's been some
> > disagreement with strong opinions on either side w
On 28/07/11 19:42, Mike Blumenkrantz wrote:
> This is a community project, so we can do stuff like having polls and taking
> votes right? Okay then, since there's been some disagreement with strong
> opinions on either side we're voting on a super important issue - header size.
> Specifically, the
On Thu, 28 Jul 2011 12:42:32 -0400 Mike Blumenkrantz
wrote:
> 1) LEAVE AS-IS, CONTINUE ADDING DOCS TO Elementary.h
> 2) SPLIT INTO WIDGET HEADERS SIMILAR TO EINA
> 3) OTHER (Explain)
2 gets my vote.
> PS. I expect all active developers to vote on this, even if you do
> not have a strong opinion
On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 6:42 PM, Mike Blumenkrantz wrote:
> This is a community project, so we can do stuff like having polls and taking
> votes right? Okay then, since there's been some disagreement with strong
> opinions on either side we're voting on a super important issue - header size.
> Spe
This is a community project, so we can do stuff like having polls and taking
votes right? Okay then, since there's been some disagreement with strong
opinions on either side we're voting on a super important issue - header size.
Specifically, the Elementary.h header.
As with any serious vote, here
On Tue, 26 Jul 2011 17:42:26 -0400 Mike Blumenkrantz said:
docs in headers stay there and get expanded.
> On Sun, 17 Jul 2011 21:39:50 +0900
> Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
>
> > On Sat, 16 Jul 2011 09:23:45 -0400 Mike Blumenkrantz
> > said:
> >
> > > With the recent infusion (prof
ceforge.net
Cc:
Sent: 11-07-27(수) 06:57:43
Subject: Re: [E-devel] header size...On 07/26/11 17:42, Mike Blumenkrantz wrote:
> On Sun, 17 Jul 2011 21:39:50 +0900
> Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman)<ras...@rasterman.com> wrote:
>
>> On Sat, 16 Jul 2011 09:23:45 -0400 Mik
On 07/26/11 17:42, Mike Blumenkrantz wrote:
> On Sun, 17 Jul 2011 21:39:50 +0900
> Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
>
>> On Sat, 16 Jul 2011 09:23:45 -0400 Mike Blumenkrantz
>> said:
>>
>>> With the recent infusion (profusion?) of documentation, our header sizes
>>> have become, imo, WAAA
2011/7/26 Mike Blumenkrantz :
> On Sun, 17 Jul 2011 21:39:50 +0900
> Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
>
>> On Sat, 16 Jul 2011 09:23:45 -0400 Mike Blumenkrantz
>> said:
>>
>> > With the recent infusion (profusion?) of documentation, our header sizes
>> > have become, imo, WAAY too big
On Sun, 17 Jul 2011 21:39:50 +0900
Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
> On Sat, 16 Jul 2011 09:23:45 -0400 Mike Blumenkrantz said:
>
> > With the recent infusion (profusion?) of documentation, our header sizes
> > have become, imo, WAAY too big. They are entirely impossible to
> > navi
On Fri, 22 Jul 2011 14:41:58 +0200 (CEST)
Vincent Torri wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, 22 Jul 2011, Iván Briano (Sachiel) wrote:
>
> > 2011/7/22 Daniel Juyung Seo :
> >> Right. Finish documentation first.
> >>
> >> Just curious, I checked Elementary.h.in.
> >> It has 13298 lines now :)
> >> But it'll be
On Fri, 22 Jul 2011, Iván Briano (Sachiel) wrote:
2011/7/22 Daniel Juyung Seo :
Right. Finish documentation first.
Just curious, I checked Elementary.h.in.
It has 13298 lines now :)
But it'll be so much longer once genlist documentation is moved to header.
genlist has 82 APIs :)
Stop bitc
2011/7/22 Daniel Juyung Seo :
> Right. Finish documentation first.
>
> Just curious, I checked Elementary.h.in.
> It has 13298 lines now :)
> But it'll be so much longer once genlist documentation is moved to header.
> genlist has 82 APIs :)
>
Stop bitching about header sizes, we can always just b
Right. Finish documentation first.
Just curious, I checked Elementary.h.in.
It has 13298 lines now :)
But it'll be so much longer once genlist documentation is moved to header.
genlist has 82 APIs :)
Daniel Juyung Seo (SeoZ)
On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 7:50 PM, Vincent Torri wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, 20
On Wed, 20 Jul 2011, Daniel Juyung Seo wrote:
Hi Mike,
This is why I raised elementary header separation topic.
http://www.mail-archive.com/enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net/msg31764.html
I found that reading a big elementary header was so painful.
But we concluded that we're gonna us
Hi Mike,
This is why I raised elementary header separation topic.
http://www.mail-archive.com/enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net/msg31764.html
I found that reading a big elementary header was so painful.
But we concluded that we're gonna use one header for elementary.
So we're just followin
On Sun, 17 Jul 2011, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
> On Sat, 16 Jul 2011 09:23:45 -0400 Mike Blumenkrantz said:
>
>> With the recent infusion (profusion?) of documentation, our header sizes have
>> become, imo, WAAY too big. They are entirely impossible to navigate, and
>> this is
On Sat, 16 Jul 2011 09:23:45 -0400 Mike Blumenkrantz said:
> With the recent infusion (profusion?) of documentation, our header sizes have
> become, imo, WAAY too big. They are entirely impossible to navigate, and
> this is a problem that will only get worse.
>
> As an example, the elm .h fi
With the recent infusion (profusion?) of documentation, our header sizes have
become, imo, WAAY too big. They are entirely impossible to navigate, and
this is a problem that will only get worse.
As an example, the elm .h file is over 10k lines already, and I have to scroll
quite a bit to find
52 matches
Mail list logo
