Re: [E-devel] Debian files in CVS
On Wed, 19 Mar 2008 16:36:27 +0100 Falko Schmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED] babbled: no objections here :) Hello everyone, I've been responsible for the CVS commits regarding Debian packaging since about two years. The PkgE Debian Team (http://wiki.debian.org/PkgE) is about to upload or already uploading some EFL packages to Debian experimental. Would there be any objections if I merge their changes into the Debian files in CVS to make packages compatible to future official Debian packages? It would affect the following packages (for now): ecore e_dbus edje eet efreet embryo evas ewl The changes would include a much better (and Debian policy compliant) packaging although I would stick to the one-package-per-module method (as it can be found in evas, for example). Furthermore I would remove the now invalid maintainer name and email address ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and replace it with mine ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) - but of course only if there're no objections. I've attached a sample patch for eet. I also maintain a Debian sid repository, before on edevelop.org, now on debian.alphagemini.org, which includes CVS snapshot builds and more or less reflects the build rules I maintain in CVS. Regards, Falko -- - Codito, ergo sum - I code, therefore I am -- The Rasterman (Carsten Haitzler)[EMAIL PROTECTED] - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/ ___ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
[E-devel] Debian files in CVS
Hello everyone, I've been responsible for the CVS commits regarding Debian packaging since about two years. The PkgE Debian Team (http://wiki.debian.org/PkgE) is about to upload or already uploading some EFL packages to Debian experimental. Would there be any objections if I merge their changes into the Debian files in CVS to make packages compatible to future official Debian packages? It would affect the following packages (for now): ecore e_dbus edje eet efreet embryo evas ewl The changes would include a much better (and Debian policy compliant) packaging although I would stick to the one-package-per-module method (as it can be found in evas, for example). Furthermore I would remove the now invalid maintainer name and email address ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and replace it with mine ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) - but of course only if there're no objections. I've attached a sample patch for eet. I also maintain a Debian sid repository, before on edevelop.org, now on debian.alphagemini.org, which includes CVS snapshot builds and more or less reflects the build rules I maintain in CVS. Regards, Falko - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/___ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
Re: [E-devel] Debian files in CVS
On Mar 19, 2008, at 8:36 AM, Falko Schmidt wrote: Hello everyone, I've been responsible for the CVS commits regarding Debian packaging since about two years. The PkgE Debian Team (http://wiki.debian.org/PkgE) is about to upload or already uploading some EFL packages to Debian experimental. Would there be any objections if I merge their changes into the Debian files in CVS to make packages compatible to future official Debian packages? It would affect the following packages (for now): ecore e_dbus edje eet efreet embryo evas ewl The changes would include a much better (and Debian policy compliant) packaging although I would stick to the one-package-per-module method (as it can be found in evas, for example). Furthermore I would remove the now invalid maintainer name and email address ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and replace it with mine ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) - but of course only if there're no objections. I've attached a sample patch for eet. I also maintain a Debian sid repository, before on edevelop.org, now on debian.alphagemini.org, which includes CVS snapshot builds and more or less reflects the build rules I maintain in CVS. Go for it. You should also update the wiki and enlightenment.org pages to reflect that you're the package maintainer instead of me. :) -Blake - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/ ___ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
Re: [E-devel] Debian files in CVS and Pkg-E
Hi Falko, On Wed, 2008-03-19 at 16:36 +0100, Falko Schmidt wrote: The PkgE Debian Team (http://wiki.debian.org/PkgE) is about to upload or already uploading some EFL packages to Debian experimental. I'm a Member of the Pkg-E team. We are currently working on getting everything needed for e17 into experimental. When we are confident that the packaging is sane, we will push them into unstable. My guess is that it will not be in time for the Lenny release. Would there be any objections if I merge their changes into the Debian files in CVS to make packages compatible to future official Debian packages? When doing that, please make sure that the snapshot tarballs do not include a debian/ directory as this makes the workflow for the Pkg-E Team more complicated. The changes would include a much better (and Debian policy compliant) packaging although I would stick to the one-package-per-module method (as it can be found in evas, for example). We are grouping the modules together if they have similar runtime dependencies and the size of the individual module is very small. The different package split will probably make mixing Pkg-E packages and yours difficult. Jan - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/ ___ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
Re: [E-devel] Debian files in CVS and Pkg-E
Hi Jan, On Wed, Mar 19, 2008 at 6:57 PM, Jan Luebbe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Falko, On Wed, 2008-03-19 at 16:36 +0100, Falko Schmidt wrote: The PkgE Debian Team (http://wiki.debian.org/PkgE) is about to upload or already uploading some EFL packages to Debian experimental. I'm a Member of the Pkg-E team. We are currently working on getting everything needed for e17 into experimental. When we are confident that the packaging is sane, we will push them into unstable. My guess is that it will not be in time for the Lenny release. OK, good to hear that. Would there be any objections if I merge their changes into the Debian files in CVS to make packages compatible to future official Debian packages? When doing that, please make sure that the snapshot tarballs do not include a debian/ directory as this makes the workflow for the Pkg-E Team more complicated. Sure, no problem. I won't touch anything below debian/ anyway since debian/changelog has been removed from configure.in. The changes would include a much better (and Debian policy compliant) packaging although I would stick to the one-package-per-module method (as it can be found in evas, for example). We are grouping the modules together if they have similar runtime dependencies and the size of the individual module is very small. That sounds sane. Maybe I'll adapt some grouping as well then. The different package split will probably make mixing Pkg-E packages and yours difficult. You're right, I'll either have to group them as you did or I will have to go through adding a considerable amount of dependencies. I'll look into it. Falko - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/ ___ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
Re: [E-devel] [Pkg-e-devel] Debian files in CVS and Pkg-E
Jan Luebbe [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: The changes would include a much better (and Debian policy compliant) packaging although I would stick to the one-package-per-module method (as it can be found in evas, for example). We are grouping the modules together if they have similar runtime dependencies and the size of the individual module is very small. The different package split will probably make mixing Pkg-E packages and yours difficult. So the right solution is to centralize effort, we have Lutin (Albin Tonerre) working for Ubuntu packaging in the pkg-e repository, you're very welcome to join the effort: [EMAIL PROTECTED] is where most discussion is held, but we also have an alioth project/mailing list. Cheers, -- Niv Sardi - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/ ___ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
