Re: [e-users] enlightenment_remote "retired"? {expletive deleted}

2009-10-01 Thread Wido
>> On Thursday 01 October 2009 20:33:53 Ralf Mardorf wrote: >> > IMO e17 isn't user friendly because the e17 coders expect to much >> > knowledge from the users and even users with knowledge sometimes don't >> > like to spend too much time to set up a DE. E17 is very particular >> > about this. Ju

Re: [e-users] enlightenment_remote "retired"? {expletive deleted}

2009-10-01 Thread The Rasterman
On Fri, 2 Oct 2009 01:54:05 -0400 P Purkayastha said: > On Thursday 01 October 2009 20:33:53 Ralf Mardorf wrote: > > IMO e17 isn't user friendly because the e17 coders expect to much > > knowledge from the users and even users with knowledge sometimes don't > > like to spend too much time to set

Re: [e-users] enlightenment_remote "retired"? {expletive deleted}

2009-10-01 Thread P Purkayastha
On Thursday 01 October 2009 20:33:53 Ralf Mardorf wrote: > IMO e17 isn't user friendly because the e17 coders expect to much > knowledge from the users and even users with knowledge sometimes don't > like to spend too much time to set up a DE. E17 is very particular > about this. Just my impressio

Re: [e-users] enlightenment_remote "retired"? {expletive deleted}

2009-10-01 Thread The Rasterman
On Fri, 02 Oct 2009 02:33:53 +0200 Ralf Mardorf said: > IMO e17 isn't user friendly because the e17 coders expect to much > knowledge from the users and even users with knowledge sometimes don't > like to spend too much time to set up a DE. E17 is very particular about > this. Just my impressi

Re: [e-users] enlightenment_remote "retired"? {expletive deleted}

2009-10-01 Thread Ralf Mardorf
Michael Jennings wrote: > On Thursday, 01 October 2009, at 21:33:43 (+0200), > Ralf Mardorf wrote: > > >> your note is fair, but anyway I guess you misunderstood him. OTOH >> don't speak for all FLOSS coders. Some do like to get feedback, also >> negative feedback, that's why there are a lot of

Re: [e-users] enlightenment_remote "retired"? {expletive deleted}

2009-10-01 Thread Michael Jennings
On Thursday, 01 October 2009, at 22:06:57 (+0400), batden wrote: > "pay someone to make whatever additions/modifications/ > changes/reverts you wish" > > Very good idea! How about hiring a dev to implement utf-8 in Eterm, you > lazy brat... No need. There's already a patch out there for UTF-8 s

Re: [e-users] enlightenment_remote "retired"? {expletive deleted}

2009-10-01 Thread Michael Jennings
On Thursday, 01 October 2009, at 21:33:43 (+0200), Ralf Mardorf wrote: > your note is fair, but anyway I guess you misunderstood him. OTOH > don't speak for all FLOSS coders. Some do like to get feedback, also > negative feedback, that's why there are a lot of very good WMs/ DEs > for Linux. Ther

Re: [e-users] enlightenment_remote "retired"? {expletive deleted}

2009-10-01 Thread Ralf Mardorf
batden wrote: > "pay someone to make whatever additions/modifications/ > changes/reverts you wish" > > Very good idea! How about hiring a dev to implement utf-8 in Eterm, you > lazy brat... Just a tip, because in the past I also sometimes lost countenance. Ignore sentences similar to "pay someone

Re: [e-users] enlightenment_remote "retired"? {expletive deleted}

2009-10-01 Thread Ralf Mardorf
Michael Jennings wrote: > On Thursday, 01 October 2009, at 02:04:54 (-0400), > Joe(theWordy)Philbrook wrote: > > >> Or to put it another way, Who do I gotta kill to get them to keep >> something like enlightenment_remote around, even if it's really just >> a wrapper written to keep as many thing

Re: [e-users] enlightenment_remote "retired"? {expletive deleted}

2009-10-01 Thread batden
On jeu., 2009-10-01 at 08:44 -0700, Michael Jennings wrote: > On Thursday, 01 October 2009, at 02:04:54 (-0400), > Joe(theWordy)Philbrook wrote: > > > Or to put it another way, Who do I gotta kill to get them to keep > > something like enlightenment_remote around, even if it's really just > > a wr

Re: [e-users] enlightenment_remote "retired"? {expletive deleted}

2009-10-01 Thread Michael Jennings
On Thursday, 01 October 2009, at 02:04:54 (-0400), Joe(theWordy)Philbrook wrote: > Or to put it another way, Who do I gotta kill to get them to keep > something like enlightenment_remote around, even if it's really just > a wrapper written to keep as many things scriptable as possible... Stop whi

Re: [e-users] [E-devel] Fwd: E SVN: barbieri IN trunk/ecore: . src/lib/ecore

2009-10-01 Thread Christopher Michael
Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote: > Fwd to e-devel and e-users as some don't read e-svn but might be > interested. Some people at IRC didn't know about mojito and rygel, so > links: > > > http://moblin.org/documentation/moblin-sdk/coding-tutorials/mojito-web-services-tutorial > > http://li

Re: [e-users] enlightenment_remote "retired"? {expletive deleted} (was: emprint:)

2009-10-01 Thread The Rasterman
On Thu, 1 Oct 2009 03:22:39 -0300 Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri said: > no need to write such a huge mail... it's being removed for good. But > functionality is not going away, nice guys are working on dbus-based > replacement, to be loaded as optional module (so those like you can > load and be happy