On Mon, 25 Jun 2012 13:55:02 +0100 Mick said:
discomfitor on to list. dns.c issue.
nb - dns.c went in about the same time (a bit after) the refcount change by
mike - thus why your going back may fix it too.
> On 25 June 2012 09:40, Carsten Haitzler wrote:
> > On Mon, 25 Jun 2012 06:15:17 +0100
On 25 June 2012 09:40, Carsten Haitzler wrote:
> On Mon, 25 Jun 2012 06:15:17 +0100 Mick said:
>
>> On Monday 25 Jun 2012 01:01:25 Carsten Haitzler wrote:
>> > On Sun, 24 Jun 2012 16:45:44 +0100 Mick said:
>>
>> > > However, ...
>> > >
>> > > 71737 crashed.
>> >
>> > 71400 is where i fixed ecore
On Mon, 25 Jun 2012 06:15:17 +0100 Mick said:
> On Monday 25 Jun 2012 01:01:25 Carsten Haitzler wrote:
> > On Sun, 24 Jun 2012 16:45:44 +0100 Mick said:
>
> > > However, ...
> > >
> > > 71737 crashed.
> >
> > 71400 is where i fixed ecore_con and ecore_ipc. discomfitor added dns.c
> > after th
On Monday 25 Jun 2012 01:01:25 Carsten Haitzler wrote:
> On Sun, 24 Jun 2012 16:45:44 +0100 Mick said:
> > However, ...
> >
> > 71737 crashed.
>
> 71400 is where i fixed ecore_con and ecore_ipc. discomfitor added dns.c
> after that before he changed my ecore_con/ipc refcounting to be something
On Sun, 24 Jun 2012 16:45:44 +0100 Mick said:
> On Sunday 24 Jun 2012 14:08:00 Carsten Haitzler wrote:
> > On Sun, 24 Jun 2012 12:33:30 +0100 Mick said:
> > > On Thursday 21 Jun 2012 14:55:21 Carsten Haitzler wrote:
> > > > On Thu, 21 Jun 2012 14:44:51 +0100 Mick
> said:
> > > > > On 21 June 2
On Sunday 24 Jun 2012 16:45:44 Mick wrote:
> On Sunday 24 Jun 2012 14:08:00 Carsten Haitzler wrote:
> > On Sun, 24 Jun 2012 12:33:30 +0100 Mick said:
> > > On Thursday 21 Jun 2012 14:55:21 Carsten Haitzler wrote:
> > > > On Thu, 21 Jun 2012 14:44:51 +0100 Mick
>
> said:
> > > > > On 21 June 2012
On Sunday 24 Jun 2012 14:08:00 Carsten Haitzler wrote:
> On Sun, 24 Jun 2012 12:33:30 +0100 Mick said:
> > On Thursday 21 Jun 2012 14:55:21 Carsten Haitzler wrote:
> > > On Thu, 21 Jun 2012 14:44:51 +0100 Mick
said:
> > > > On 21 June 2012 07:43, Michael Blumenkrantz
> > > >
> > > > wrote:
> >
On Sun, 24 Jun 2012 12:33:30 +0100 Mick said:
> On Thursday 21 Jun 2012 14:55:21 Carsten Haitzler wrote:
> > On Thu, 21 Jun 2012 14:44:51 +0100 Mick said:
> > > On 21 June 2012 07:43, Michael Blumenkrantz
> > >
> > > wrote:
> > > > without a valgrind log I got nothing. I've gotten random crash
On Thursday 21 Jun 2012 14:55:21 Carsten Haitzler wrote:
> On Thu, 21 Jun 2012 14:44:51 +0100 Mick said:
> > On 21 June 2012 07:43, Michael Blumenkrantz
> >
> > wrote:
> > > without a valgrind log I got nothing. I've gotten random crashing from
> > > this (specifically when there is no network c
On Friday 22 Jun 2012 08:48:27 Mick wrote:
> On Thursday 21 Jun 2012 19:03:19 Mick wrote:
>
> As I experimented some more, I removed the sse3 flag and compiled rev.72676
>
> So far I had no problem at start up and fingers crossed no crash yet! :-)
>
> Could it be that my system did not like sse
On Thursday 21 Jun 2012 19:03:19 Mick wrote:
As I experimented some more, I removed the sse3 flag and compiled rev.72676
So far I had no problem at start up and fingers crossed no crash yet! :-)
Could it be that my system did not like sse3? o_O
processor : 7
vendor_id : GenuineInt
On Thursday 21 Jun 2012 14:55:21 you wrote:
> On Thu, 21 Jun 2012 14:44:51 +0100 Mick said:
> > On 21 June 2012 07:43, Michael Blumenkrantz
> >
> > wrote:
> > > without a valgrind log I got nothing. I've gotten random crashing from
> > > this (specifically when there is no network connectivity)
On Thu, 21 Jun 2012 14:44:51 +0100 Mick said:
> On 21 June 2012 07:43, Michael Blumenkrantz
> wrote:
> > without a valgrind log I got nothing. I've gotten random crashing from this
> > (specifically when there is no network connectivity) for as long as I can
> > remember, so it's probably relate
On 21 June 2012 07:43, Michael Blumenkrantz
wrote:
> without a valgrind log I got nothing. I've gotten random crashing from this
> (specifically when there is no network connectivity) for as long as I can
> remember, so it's probably related to this.
These symptoms only started 2-3 weeks ago here
On Wed, 20 Jun 2012 23:04:51 +0100 Mick said:
oooh ecore_con. the only things that make sense here are that svr is freed OR
svr content is corrupt OR the svr->clients list is corrupt. which it is u'd
have to interactively find out like:
p *svr
p *svr->clients
(gdb commands) but i suspect this h
I have now managed to capture a crash as it tries to start (I'm on rev.72550):
(gdb) #0 0x7f55c11e9f9d in waitpid () from /lib64/libpthread.so.0
No symbol table info available.
#1 0x004386ec in e_alert_show (sig=) at e_alert.c:57
ret =
status = 0
args = {0x7f
On Wednesday 20 Jun 2012 21:09:43 Mick wrote:
> On Monday 18 Jun 2012 01:26:14 Cedric BAIL wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 1:34 AM, Mick wrote:
> > > I haven't yet recompiled everything with -g to do in depth debugging
> > > but something has changed since last weekend. On revision 72292 I get
On Monday 18 Jun 2012 01:26:14 Cedric BAIL wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 1:34 AM, Mick wrote:
> > I haven't yet recompiled everything with -g to do in depth debugging but
> > something has changed since last weekend. On revision 72292 I get random
> > crashes when I try to start e17. Also, at
On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 1:34 AM, Mick wrote:
> I haven't yet recompiled everything with -g to do in depth debugging but
> something has changed since last weekend. On revision 72292 I get random
> crashes when I try to start e17. Also, at random I may get a crash in the
> middle of a session.
>
I haven't yet recompiled everything with -g to do in depth debugging but
something has changed since last weekend. On revision 72292 I get random
crashes when I try to start e17. Also, at random I may get a crash in the
middle of a session.
I noticed that enlightenment and /usr/lib64/enlighte
20 matches
Mail list logo
