Re: [e-users] Systemd integration

2013-03-31 Thread Vinícius dos Santos Oliveira
2013/3/30 Jérôme Pinot > There are some technical reasons for not using systemd. One of them: bugs > > http://bugs.freedesktop.org/buglist.cgi?query_format=advanced&bug_status=NEW&bug_status=ASSIGNED&bug_status=REOPENED&product=systemd > Are you concerned with bugs? Why use e17 then? -- Viníc

Re: [e-users] Systemd integration

2013-03-30 Thread Cedric BAIL
On Sat, Mar 30, 2013 at 8:45 PM, Alan McKinnon wrote: > On 30/03/2013 13:17, Cedric BAIL wrote: >> On Sat, Mar 30, 2013 at 7:36 PM, Alan McKinnon >> wrote: >>> On 30/03/2013 03:52, Cedric BAIL wrote: I do believe that Enlightenment is driven by choosing the best possible technical s

Re: [e-users] Systemd integration

2013-03-30 Thread Alan McKinnon
On 30/03/2013 13:17, Cedric BAIL wrote: > On Sat, Mar 30, 2013 at 7:36 PM, Alan McKinnon > wrote: >> On 30/03/2013 03:52, Cedric BAIL wrote: >>>I do believe that Enlightenment is driven by choosing the best >>> possible technical solution to provide the best possible experience on >>> your ha

Re: [e-users] Systemd integration

2013-03-30 Thread Cedric BAIL
On Sat, Mar 30, 2013 at 7:36 PM, Alan McKinnon wrote: > On 30/03/2013 03:52, Cedric BAIL wrote: >>I do believe that Enlightenment is driven by choosing the best >> possible technical solution to provide the best possible experience on >> your hardware. Not by religious belief and I am not goin

Re: [e-users] Systemd integration

2013-03-30 Thread Alan McKinnon
On 30/03/2013 03:52, Cedric BAIL wrote: >I do believe that Enlightenment is driven by choosing the best > possible technical solution to provide the best possible experience on > your hardware. Not by religious belief and I am not going to limit the > capability of Enlightenment for those silly

Re: [e-users] Systemd integration

2013-03-30 Thread Cedric BAIL
On Sat, Mar 30, 2013 at 5:51 PM, Mick wrote: > On Saturday 30 Mar 2013 08:08:55 Cedric BAIL wrote: >> As previously stated, systemd will never become a strong dependency of >> EFL or Enlightenment even if Lennart succeed in his plan to conquer >> the world. It will always remain an optional depend

Re: [e-users] Systemd integration

2013-03-30 Thread Mick
On Saturday 30 Mar 2013 08:08:55 Cedric BAIL wrote: > As previously stated, systemd will never become a strong dependency of > EFL or Enlightenment even if Lennart succeed in his plan to conquer > the world. It will always remain an optional dependency. Phew! :-) I'm keeping an eye on how eudev

Re: [e-users] Systemd integration

2013-03-30 Thread Cedric BAIL
On Sat, Mar 30, 2013 at 2:07 PM, Jérôme Pinot wrote: > On 03/30/13 10:52, Cedric BAIL wrote: >> On Sat, Mar 30, 2013 at 5:45 AM, Alan McKinnon >> wrote: >> > On 29/03/2013 21:30, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote: >> >> On Fri, Mar 29, 2013 at 4:21 PM, Mick wrote: >> >> >> >>> Guys, will the rest

Re: [e-users] Systemd integration

2013-03-29 Thread Jérôme Pinot
On 03/30/13 10:52, Cedric BAIL wrote: > On Sat, Mar 30, 2013 at 5:45 AM, Alan McKinnon > wrote: > > On 29/03/2013 21:30, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote: > >> On Fri, Mar 29, 2013 at 4:21 PM, Mick wrote: > >> > >>> Guys, will the rest of us who are not using RHL clusters, or distros that > >>> ar

Re: [e-users] Systemd integration

2013-03-29 Thread Cedric BAIL
On Sat, Mar 30, 2013 at 5:45 AM, Alan McKinnon wrote: > On 29/03/2013 21:30, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote: >> On Fri, Mar 29, 2013 at 4:21 PM, Mick wrote: >> >>> Guys, will the rest of us who are not using RHL clusters, or distros that >>> are >>> adopting wholesale systemd and udev, end up bei

Re: [e-users] Systemd integration

2013-03-29 Thread Alan McKinnon
On 29/03/2013 21:30, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote: > On Fri, Mar 29, 2013 at 4:21 PM, Mick wrote: > >> Guys, will the rest of us who are not using RHL clusters, or distros that >> are >> adopting wholesale systemd and udev, end up being locked out of the party? > > > unfortunately no, but the

Re: [e-users] Systemd integration

2013-03-29 Thread Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
On Fri, Mar 29, 2013 at 4:21 PM, Mick wrote: > Guys, will the rest of us who are not using RHL clusters, or distros that > are > adopting wholesale systemd and udev, end up being locked out of the party? unfortunately no, but they should -- Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri http://profusion.mobi embe

Re: [e-users] Systemd integration

2013-03-29 Thread Mick
Guys, will the rest of us who are not using RHL clusters, or distros that are adopting wholesale systemd and udev, end up being locked out of the party? On Friday 29 Mar 2013 18:21:24 Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote: > good one :-) > > it would be good to move some e17 services to systemd se

Re: [e-users] Systemd integration

2013-03-29 Thread Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
good one :-) it would be good to move some e17 services to systemd services (fm daemon, thumbnailer...) On Fri, Mar 29, 2013 at 5:58 AM, Cedric BAIL wrote: > Hello everyone, > > A little news from the b0rker master. I found a really great > opportunity to bork Enlightenment and EFL by join

[e-users] Systemd integration

2013-03-29 Thread Cedric BAIL
Hello everyone, A little news from the b0rker master. I found a really great opportunity to bork Enlightenment and EFL by joining force in Lennart's evil attempt to break the world with his work on Systemd. I believe he should receive an honorary borker cup like all proud members of the Enlightenm