On 27/01/06, Виктор Кожухаров <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> actually, the correct name is Windows Explorer, so absolutely nothing is
> stopping me for using the name "Explorer" for an application
I remember the name "Lindows" ran into some problems. So did Mike Roe
Soft. Maybe it's best not to me
On Fri, 27 Jan 2006 12:44:06 -0500 Michael Jennings <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled:
> On Friday, 27 January 2006, at 11:08:48 (+0900),
> Carsten Haitzler wrote:
>
> > "leatherman" - cool an s&m doll!
>
> No, that's "horms."
BWAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA rotfl!
--
- Codito, ergo sum - "I c
On Sat, 2006-01-28 at 05:32 +1000, David Seikel wrote:
> On Fri, 27 Jan 2006 11:31:30 +0100 Andreas Volz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
> > I think these names are _really_ smart. Worse luck that Explorer is
> > yet reserved, so this would be a great name for an E filemanager.
>
> Explorer is onl
David Seikel wrote:
On Fri, 27 Jan 2006 11:31:30 +0100 Andreas Volz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
I think these names are _really_ smart. Worse luck that Explorer is
yet reserved, so this would be a great name for an E filemanager.
Explorer is only "reserved" for one particular OS that is not
On Fri, 27 Jan 2006 11:31:30 +0100 Andreas Volz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> I think these names are _really_ smart. Worse luck that Explorer is
> yet reserved, so this would be a great name for an E filemanager.
Explorer is only "reserved" for one particular OS that is not anywhere
near the top
On Friday, 27 January 2006, at 11:08:48 (+0900),
Carsten Haitzler wrote:
> "leatherman" - cool an s&m doll!
No, that's "horms."
Michael
--
Michael Jennings (a.k.a. KainX) http://www.kainx.org/ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
n + 1, Inc., http://www.nplus1.net/ Author, Eterm (www.eterm.org)
---
Am Fri, 27 Jan 2006 09:43:22 + schrieb Foxy:
> in gnome we have nautilus and konquerer in kde, both bear no
> association with file manager for me...
No, they have an association:
On MS Windows the file explorer is named "Explorer".
Read Wikipedia:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Konqueror
>
On Thu, 26 Jan 2006 16:24:19 +0100 Andreas Volz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled:
> Hi,
>
> since there're more and more applications I begin to forget the names
> and if I search for an application it's hard to remind.
>
> e.g.
>
> Eclair
> Elicit
> Embrace
> Engage
> Entice
> Entrance
> Entropy
>
On Thu, 26 Jan 2006 19:56:31 +0100 Andreas Volz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled:
> Am Thu, 26 Jan 2006 12:56:47 -0500 schrieb Michael Jennings:
>
> > [...]
> > I have said this many, many times. No one cares. So don't waste your
> > breath. Most of them just pick random 'e' words off a list becaus
On Thu, 26 Jan 2006 12:56:47 -0500 Michael Jennings <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled:
> On Thursday, 26 January 2006, at 16:24:19 (+0100),
> Andreas Volz wrote:
>
> > since there're more and more applications I begin to forget the names
> > and if I search for an application it's hard to remind.
> >
On Thu, 26 Jan 2006 16:24:19 +0100
Andreas Volz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> since there're more and more applications I begin to forget the names
> and if I search for an application it's hard to remind.
>
> e.g. blablabla
Yes? I can almost remeber them all.
And if you can't why not ju
On Thu, 26 Jan 2006 17:00:20 -0500 Geoffrey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> I would agree, but I also would prefer the current developers
> continue to focus on the code. I'd love to give a shot at creating
> some icons, but I'm afraid that might be something a developer might
> want to keep 'as the
On 26/01/06, Geoffrey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Entice was going to be some pr0n application.
Certainly, there are better names for a pr0n application. Even
Entrance... never mind, I won't go there ;)
Seriously, though, if those names made real sence, I suppose we
wouldn't be joking about the
Michael Jennings wrote:
I have said this many, many times. No one cares. So don't waste your
breath. Most of them just pick random 'e' words off a list because
they're cool and don't give a shit whether or not it makes sense to
name an app with that word.
Now I love that approach! :)
--
Un
Christian Walther wrote:
Same with me...
I installed all e-related Apps I could find using their ebuilds, but
it was hard to remember their names. So I went through my old CVS-tree
and looked at the READMEs. I created a small text file that contains a
list of the app names and their purpose.
So
Am Thu, 26 Jan 2006 12:56:47 -0500 schrieb Michael Jennings:
> [...]
> I have said this many, many times. No one cares. So don't waste your
> breath. Most of them just pick random 'e' words off a list because
> they're cool and don't give a shit whether or not it makes sense to
> name an app wi
On Thursday, 26 January 2006, at 16:24:19 (+0100),
Andreas Volz wrote:
> since there're more and more applications I begin to forget the names
> and if I search for an application it's hard to remind.
>
> e.g.
>
> Eclair
> Elicit
> Embrace
> Engage
> Entice
> Entrance
> Entropy
> eRSS
> Evidence
Personally I think that having a list of E apps on the menu would be
great. The names can stay the same if we want, or they can change, as
long as they work great.
Paul
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log
Same with me...
I installed all e-related Apps I could find using their ebuilds, but
it was hard to remember their names. So I went through my old CVS-tree
and looked at the READMEs. I created a small text file that contains a
list of the app names and their purpose.
So far, I think that "Entranc
Hello,
* Foxy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote at [20060126 15:53]:
> Ildar Sagdejev wrote:
> >On 26/01/06, Andreas Volz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >
> >>I understand that everyone needs a cool name for his own little
> >>application as E is looking really cool. But perhaps some intuitive and
>
Ildar Sagdejev wrote:
On 26/01/06, Andreas Volz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I understand that everyone needs a cool name for his own little
application as E is looking really cool. But perhaps some intuitive and
easy to remind names are also great. Or am I alone with this opinion?
It's
On 26/01/06, Andreas Volz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I understand that everyone needs a cool name for his own little
> application as E is looking really cool. But perhaps some intuitive and
> easy to remind names are also great. Or am I alone with this opinion?
It's also been taking me a while
22 matches
Mail list logo
