On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 12:37 AM, Carsten Haitzler ras...@rasterman.com wrote:
odd. it should be 0 to 1. 1 == max, 0 == of. so 0.1 == go up 10%, -0.1 == go
down 10%.
And it used to work with the defaults. But it works now with the step
size set to 10, and seems to be interpreting that as a
On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 5:36 PM, Carsten Haitzler ras...@rasterman.com wrote:
that'd be e - the default keybindings. check them. that SHOULD be adjusting
monitor brightness up and down. the action has a value for the step. try
raising that value?
That did it! It was set to +/-0.1. I'm guessing
Just a quick follow-up... I ran a naked X session (no window manager,
just an xterm), and this time xev shows there are keycodes detected
when i press the brightness buttons. As expected, they're off by 8
from the terminal's keycodes. And xmodmap shows that these keycodes
are what they're supposed
From: Peter Flynn pe...@silmaril.ie
This is a very common occurrence in all Linux interfaces I have used. I
*believe* it's because the loading of entry names, icons, paths, etc is
done at the time your cursor hovers on the menu (aka in real time,
just-in-time, etc), and it take a lot of
I see something odd in the menubar, menus, and dialog boxes: options
that are greyed out don't appear as grey (or another colour), but
instead appear in a sort of double-strike style. Not quite bold, but
instead the individual characters are overlayed by a duplicate,
shifted down and right one
From: Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) ras...@rasterman.com
i don't ever even need a systray - i haven't for years.
So what DO you do about programs that run mostly in the background,
but need some kind of place to display an icon for interacting with
them? e.g. Skype, Pidgin, even Chrome
The consensus seems to be that the systray in E19 is broken, and there
are no intentions to fix it. What would be a suitable E-like
replacement? What are people using right now, given that the current
systray keeps losing its icons?
Thanks!
--
Whenever and wherever you want.
From: Larry Wyble llwy...@suddenlink.net
on make install
Making install in modules
make[2]: Entering directory
`/usr/local/src/enlightenment-0.18.8/src/modules' make[3]: Entering
directory `/usr/local/src/enlightenment-0.18.8/src/modules' make[3]:
*** No rule to make target
I just had an error message pop up in a window in Enlightenment that
i've never seen before. This occurred when I selected a program from
the applications menu (normal left-click on desktop). The text of the
message is: Enlightenment is unable to fork a child process:
speedcrunch. (Speedcrunch is
Ok, I managed to track all crashes down to attempts to draw icons in
the systray. As far as I knew I didn't have one. I tried adding one to
the shelf and got an error message telling me there already was one
and you can only have one.
A bit more hunting through settings and i found there was a
Returning to Enlightenment after a long absence (E17 was pre-release,
i seem to remember) and am not able to find much in the way of end
user documentation for E18. The first thing i'd like to tweak is
window placement across desktops.
Currently i can drag a window towards the edge of my desktop,
On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 9:35 PM, Carsten Haitzler ras...@rasterman.com wrote:
you disabled the notification module?
Well, that's what i thought... it was unchecked (in Extensions
Modules Core Notification, this is the right place, isn't it?
There's also Extensions Notification) so i
Hi all,
Using E17 with Ubuntu 13.10, in case it makes a difference. I did not
like Unity at all, and remembered E16 from when i had a linux desktop
way back, so installed E17. I've only just gotten around to attempting
to tweak settings, and i think i tweaked something i shouldn't have...
The
13 matches
Mail list logo
