Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman), il 16/10/2006 01:14, scrisse:
PS: Is there an italian e17 list?
don't know - but we do have other italians on this list :)
...though they (we) could not be able to give you an answer to every
question ;)
--
Massimo Maiurana
On Sun, 15 Oct 2006 18:05:43 +0200 Michele Caini [EMAIL PROTECTED] babbled:
Hi,
I'm a new italian gentoo-user and my english is... Orrible!!
Otherwise, I'll try to explain my problem.
I'd like to compile evidence, but it's impossible!! There is a problem in
tooltip.c (undefined reference
Evidence needs to be updated to API changes in Evas.
On 10/13/06, Zachary Goldberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The other day i was rebuilding my e-setup, as i hear its good to do
that now and then, on my desktop and noticed evidence didn't look
right. So i attempted to recompile it and got a
Justin wrote:
Luca wrote:
Hi!
I'm trying to compile evidence but it ends up with errors.
Attached is the configigure and make log.
Is Evidence even in active development still?
I don't know but the last package I saw was of 2005, however it looked
nice so I tried to install it.
Luca
Luca wrote:
Justin wrote:
Luca wrote:
Hi!
I'm trying to compile evidence but it ends up with errors.
Attached is the configigure and make log.
Is Evidence even in active development still?
I don't know but the last package I saw was of 2005, however it looked
On Sunday, 01 October 2006, at 11:11:59 (-0700),
Justin wrote:
Evidence isn't being developed anymore. The replacement is called
Entropy.
There is no truth to this statement whatsoever. Evidence development
has not stopped, and Entropy is not a replacement for anything.
Michael
--
Michael
On Sun, 1 Oct 2006 14:21:12 -0400
Michael Jennings [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sunday, 01 October 2006, at 11:11:59 (-0700),
Justin wrote:
Evidence isn't being developed anymore. The replacement is called
Entropy.
There is no truth to this statement whatsoever. Evidence development
Anders Troback wrote:
On Sun, 1 Oct 2006 14:21:12 -0400
Michael Jennings [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sunday, 01 October 2006, at 11:11:59 (-0700),
Justin wrote:
Evidence isn't being developed anymore. The replacement is called
Entropy.
There is no truth to this statement
Justin wrote:
Foxy wrote:
I wonder if evidence is still being developed? As I see the last CVS
commit was in July. The problem is that I cannot compile it against
the latest cvs build of e17, got the error about evas. Could it be
that the current evidence is not compatible with the latest
Yeah, I'm getting the same thing:
cvs login: authorization failed: server cvs.sourceforge.net rejected
access to /cvsroot/evidence for user anonymous
it's been like that since yesterday - really anoying
Didier Casse wrote:
On 11/6/05, eric dan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hi,
recently i get
On 11/7/05, Alan Trick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yeah, I'm getting the same thing:
cvs login: authorization failed: server cvs.sourceforge.net rejected
access to /cvsroot/evidence for user anonymous
it's been like that since yesterday - really anoying
For me it has been like that for a
I do confirm this, since two weeks or so
Didier Casse a écrit :
On 11/7/05, Alan Trick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yeah, I'm getting the same thing:
cvs login: authorization failed: server cvs.sourceforge.net rejected
access to /cvsroot/evidence for user anonymous
it's been like that since
On 11/7/05, Florent Thiery [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I do confirm this, since two weeks or so
Eh oui effectivement! (Yes indeed!)
--
With kind regards,
Didier.
Yum/apt repository for DR17/EFL: http://sps.nus.edu.sg/~didierbe
Didier F.B Casse
PhD candidate, Singapore Synchrotron
eric dan wrote:
hi,
recently i get error messages saying that i should try a real
password when getting evidence from cvs.
has anyone else had this problem?
thanks
I was under the impression that evidence had been dormant for a couple
of months anyway. If I'm wrong, then that makes me a
On 11/6/05, eric dan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hi,
recently i get error messages saying that i should try a real password
when getting evidence from cvs.
has anyone else had this problem?
thanks
Yes evidence cvs has been cranky for a while now. I mentioned it to
azundris who never really
Excellent ... thanks for filling me in.
Wasnt so much confused about EFM's status as Evidence's place in the E17
scheme of things as I really like it. Not suggesting anything by this
just that it began with E and it came down the pipe with the other E17
rpms.
Certainly beats Nautilus in
Andreas Volz wrote:
Hi,
I still use Nautilus instead of evidence, because I don't like the tree
browser mode in evidence. Evidence looks really great in file modus,
but why is there no mode that has left a tree browser and right a file
browser. Like Nautilus, Konqueror, Windows Filemanager, and
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sun, 21 Aug 2005 12:35:38 +
Fernando Meira [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
been trying to theme evidence and something may not be right..
I'm using gant theme and I get this:
(...)
0 thumbnail.c::thumbnailer_cxl: sent SIGKILL to thumbnailer
Hi,
yes, it has that structure.. along with other files!
Any idea of what it's going on?On 8/21/05, Thomas Kuther [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-Hash: SHA1On Sun, 21 Aug 2005 12:35:38 +Fernando Meira [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, been trying to theme evidence and
On Fri, 04 Mar 2005 19:05:10 -0600, the sky darkened, lightning flashed and the
voice of MillTek spake thus:
Hi,
I just tried tocompile evidence. I used source that I had from about a
week ago and then I downloaded the latest CVS. In both cases the make
failed as follows:
-- snip error
On Tuesday 08 March 2005 05:35 am, ktabic wrote:
On Fri, 04 Mar 2005 19:05:10 -0600, the sky darkened, lightning flashed and
the voice of MillTek spake thus:
Hi,
I just tried tocompile evidence. I used source that I had from about a
week ago and then I downloaded the latest CVS. In both
It appears that you are missing cairo.
http://cairographics.org/introduction
^^ should have all the info you need.
On Fri, 2005-03-04 at 10:57 -0500, jim lawrence wrote:
hi all, I'm getting some build errors. i have follow destructions
made sure i had everything required. This is the output
Hello John,
Evas is not included in DR16.x download as it is part of the EFL, the base for DR17.
Evidence uses Evas for more eye-candy so i would suggest you use it :).
By the way your in luck there is a preview release of the EFL (just check
enligthenment.org)
Your sure to find other stuff to
On Tue, 2003-11-18 at 14:04, Dhruba Bandopadhyay wrote:
I checked out the entire e17 tree and compiled almost everything in the
order specified on http://www.enlightenment.org/pages/cvsnotes.html using
optional configure parameters from README files in directories checked out.
You were
Wouter van Marle wrote:
On Tue, 2003-11-18 at 14:04, Dhruba Bandopadhyay wrote:
/I checked out the entire e17 tree and compiled almost everything in the
order specified on //_http://www.enlightenment.org/pages/cvsnotes.html_ using
optional configure parameters from README files in directories
Read e17/libs/edje/README and recompile packages it mentions using the
configure parameters that it gives you. In my case, that was the key to
succeeding with previously failing packages.
I had done so already, before compiling first read the README in the
dirs. I learnt that from previous
At 10:25 PM 11/16/2003, Didier Casse wrote:
On 16/11/03, at 09:18 -0500, Hall Stevenson
[EMAIL PROTECTED]...:
On Sun, 2003-11-16 at 04:28, Didier Casse wrote:
On 15/11/03, at 09:54 -0500, Hall Stevenson
[EMAIL PROTECTED]...:
http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL
At 11:44 PM 11/16/2003, Dhruba Bandopadhyay wrote:
Didier Casse wrote:
Use the rpms. I remember that the building process wasn't so successful
too. But when I use the rpm with a --nodeps option, it went in~
On Gentoo ?? No thanks... I might download 'em and try rpm2tgz though.
Hall, why don't you
At 08:33 AM 11/17/2003, Andrew Elcock wrote:
Do a -pv (pretend with flags) on evidence.
Then emerge (manually) each dependancy *apart* from those in e/evidence.
then install the e/evidence libs etc from cvs in the usual ./autogen.sh
make make install way.
I understand that part. I always check
Hall Stevenson wrote:
At 11:44 PM 11/16/2003, Dhruba Bandopadhyay wrote:
Didier Casse wrote:
Use the rpms. I remember that the building process wasn't so
successful
too. But when I use the rpm with a --nodeps option, it went in~
On Gentoo ?? No thanks... I might download 'em and try rpm2tgz
On 15/11/03, at 09:54 -0500, Hall Stevenson [EMAIL PROTECTED]...:
http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg00723.html
I tried it last night myself and didn't get that far... :( 'make' was
failing in regards to Evas.h. I did install 'evas v1.0.0' from E's
website. I did
On Sun, 2003-11-16 at 04:28, Didier Casse wrote:
On 15/11/03, at 09:54 -0500, Hall Stevenson [EMAIL PROTECTED]...:
http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg00723.html
I tried it last night myself and didn't get that far... :( 'make' was
failing in regards to Evas.h. I did
On 16/11/03, at 09:18 -0500, Hall Stevenson [EMAIL PROTECTED]...:
On Sun, 2003-11-16 at 04:28, Didier Casse wrote:
On 15/11/03, at 09:54 -0500, Hall Stevenson [EMAIL PROTECTED]...:
http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg00723.html
I tried it last night myself and
Didier Casse wrote:
Use the rpms. I remember that the building process wasn't so successful
too. But when I use the rpm with a --nodeps option, it went in~
On Gentoo ?? No thanks... I might download 'em and try rpm2tgz though.
Hall, why don't you ask Mike Frysinger [EMAIL PROTECTED]? He's
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
Toni
Sent: Monday, September 01, 2003 9:33 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [e-users] Evidence in E
Ton Hoogstraten wrote:
Does someone have evidence 0.9.4 or 0.9.6 within Redhat 9 working? I
,
Ton
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
Toni
Sent: Monday, September 01, 2003 9:33 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [e-users] Evidence in E
Ton Hoogstraten wrote:
Does someone have evidence 0.9.4 or 0.9.6 within Redhat 9 working? I
got
On Mon, 26 May 2003 21:15:36 -0700 (PDT)
Ace Aguirre [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
can anyone point me to where i can get libebg.so.1
i've been lookin for a debian package for quite some
time now. is there any? this is because i cant unpack
rpm files.
Have you tried alien to convert rpms to
37 matches
Mail list logo
