Re: [Mozilla Enterprise] Apple M1 chips and firefox
Thank you! On Thu, Jan 7, 2021 at 4:58 PM Ryan VanderMeulen wrote: > Hi Jim, we shipped a fix in the 78.6.1esr release to address a known crash > during video playback when running ESR78 through Rosetta. Beyond that, > we're not aware of any other issues at this time. We are not planning to > backport the native ARM64 support which shipped in the Firefox 84 release > to the ESR78 channel, however. ESR78 users on M1 hardware will be running > through Rosetta until the ESR91 release ships next July. > > If you do encounter any issues, please let us know. > > Thanks, > Ryan VanderMeulen > Firefox Release Manager > > On Thu, Jan 7, 2021 at 7:09 PM Jim Weill > wrote: > >> ESR requirements say intel recommended, is there any word on the M1? any >> known issues? We're starting to get requests for new Mac laptops and need >> to know if there are any documented issues with the ESR version and M1. >> >> jim >> ___ >> Enterprise mailing list >> Enterprise@mozilla.org >> https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/enterprise >> >> To unsubscribe from this list, please visit >> https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/enterprise or send an email to >> enterprise-requ...@mozilla.org with a subject of "unsubscribe" >> > ___ Enterprise mailing list Enterprise@mozilla.org https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/enterprise To unsubscribe from this list, please visit https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/enterprise or send an email to enterprise-requ...@mozilla.org with a subject of "unsubscribe"
[Mozilla Enterprise] Apple M1 chips and firefox
ESR requirements say intel recommended, is there any word on the M1? any known issues? We're starting to get requests for new Mac laptops and need to know if there are any documented issues with the ESR version and M1. jim ___ Enterprise mailing list Enterprise@mozilla.org https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/enterprise To unsubscribe from this list, please visit https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/enterprise or send an email to enterprise-requ...@mozilla.org with a subject of "unsubscribe"
Re: [Mozilla Enterprise] Downgrade Protection and Profile Per Installation in Firefox 68
I guess my question is: if we only use one version of Firefox, and we have a pre-set profile that gets copied into the user home directory on first successful new user login for both Windows and Linux versions, we should be ok as long as we don't use any other Firefox version? I think I've only downgraded once when we made the switch from regular channel to ESR. But as I understand what you've sent, existing users will see no change, and new users should continue to get a pre-set profile under our scenario. jim On Mon, Jun 24, 2019 at 2:23 PM Mike Kaply wrote: > The best explanation is here: > > https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/mozilla.dev.platform/hVeJSYjSnO4 > > (although it references Firefox 65 - this landed in Firefox 67) > > We blogged about it here as well: > > > https://blog.nightly.mozilla.org/2019/01/14/moving-to-a-profile-per-install-architecture/ > > Support info for profiles per installation is here: > > > https://support.mozilla.org/en-US/kb/dedicated-profiles-firefox-installation > > Mike > > > On Mon, Jun 24, 2019 at 2:09 PM Jim Weill > wrote: > >> Is there a page with details on how these new features work? I don't >> know enough about the proposals to know whether we are affected. >> >> jim >> >> On Mon, Jun 24, 2019 at 1:40 PM Mike Kaply wrote: >> >>> With Firefox 68 two new features are being added; dedicated profiles per >>> Firefox installation and downgrade protection. These allow for simpler >>> on-boarding of beta and nightly users and also prevent users from hitting >>> profile corruption issues when switching between different >>> versions/channels of Firefox. >>> >>> Environment variables will be available in Firefox 68 to disable both >>> features and we are assessing whether this will be enough for ESR users to >>> maintain compatibility with their custom deployment configurations. >>> >>> It would be great if you could let us know of specific issues related to >>> these features that an environment variable would not allow addressing. >>> >>> Thanks for your input. >>> >>> Mike Kaply >>> >>> ___ >>> Enterprise mailing list >>> Enterprise@mozilla.org >>> https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/enterprise >>> >>> To unsubscribe from this list, please visit >>> https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/enterprise or send an email to >>> enterprise-requ...@mozilla.org with a subject of "unsubscribe" >>> >> ___ Enterprise mailing list Enterprise@mozilla.org https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/enterprise To unsubscribe from this list, please visit https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/enterprise or send an email to enterprise-requ...@mozilla.org with a subject of "unsubscribe"
Re: [Mozilla Enterprise] Downgrade Protection and Profile Per Installation in Firefox 68
Is there a page with details on how these new features work? I don't know enough about the proposals to know whether we are affected. jim On Mon, Jun 24, 2019 at 1:40 PM Mike Kaply wrote: > With Firefox 68 two new features are being added; dedicated profiles per > Firefox installation and downgrade protection. These allow for simpler > on-boarding of beta and nightly users and also prevent users from hitting > profile corruption issues when switching between different > versions/channels of Firefox. > > Environment variables will be available in Firefox 68 to disable both > features and we are assessing whether this will be enough for ESR users to > maintain compatibility with their custom deployment configurations. > > It would be great if you could let us know of specific issues related to > these features that an environment variable would not allow addressing. > > Thanks for your input. > > Mike Kaply > > ___ > Enterprise mailing list > Enterprise@mozilla.org > https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/enterprise > > To unsubscribe from this list, please visit > https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/enterprise or send an email to > enterprise-requ...@mozilla.org with a subject of "unsubscribe" > ___ Enterprise mailing list Enterprise@mozilla.org https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/enterprise To unsubscribe from this list, please visit https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/enterprise or send an email to enterprise-requ...@mozilla.org with a subject of "unsubscribe"
Re: [Mozilla Enterprise] Stupidly Slow Firefox ESR
On 3/12/2018 8:05 AM, R P Herrold wrote: Rather than ad hoc experimentation, is there a way to turn on (unix syslog style, perhaps across a UDP socket, so not blocking any process) 'logging', to a file, or at least a 'listener', of all that FF is doing? I would filter that 'flood' of course, so I could 'hunt down' through traditional 'partitioning' techniques, offending 'hung' DNS lookups, local or remote scripts, and who know what else There is "about:networking" which has a logging feature. When I was having slowness issues and reported it to this list about a year ago, I was told to use this feature to create a log and send it in to someone at mozilla to parse. They claimed their developers could not find the problem, then the person who originally asked for the logs handed me off to someone else to send future logs to and I never heard from anyone at mozilla again. Be aware, this logging feature will generate LARGE files if you leave it running too long. When I was doing testing for the above-mentioned issues, it created 10s of GB in log files just browsing a dozen or so sites. jim ___ Enterprise mailing list Enterprise@mozilla.org https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/enterprise To unsubscribe from this list, please visit https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/enterprise or send an email to enterprise-requ...@mozilla.org with a subject of "unsubscribe"
Re: [Mozilla Enterprise] [From: EXTERNAL] Re: Anyone migrate to 64-bit?
We push a 64-bit java to all workstations anyway, so yes? Most of our java users are not plugin users, but we still push both versions of java for the developers so it works out all around. jim On 2/9/2018 10:56 AM, Delise, John wrote: Do your users use Java based Web sites? If so, did you have to load a 64-bit version of Java on your workstations to accommodate them? Thank you, *John Delise* Windows Deployment Engineer *Image32* *VW Credit, Inc.* IT Operations 1401 Franklin Boulevard Libertyville, IL 60048 United States of America *Phone +1(847) 371-4136*** john.del...@vwcredit.com <mailto:john.del...@vwcredit.com> VW-Credit-Inc.-Logo *From:*Enterprise [mailto:enterprise-boun...@mozilla.org] *On Behalf Of *Jim Weill *Sent:* Friday, February 9, 2018 11:54 AM *To:* Jason Jackson <jasonjack...@sd44.ca>; enterprise@mozilla.org *Subject:* [From: EXTERNAL] Re: [Mozilla Enterprise] Anyone migrate to 64-bit? We deploy via batch scripts, and I migrated all our Windows clients to 64-bit around 52.4 or so. So far nobody has complained that I am aware of. jim On 2/8/2018 10:56 AM, Jason Jackson wrote: For those of you who migrated your organization to 64-bit Firefox, did you encounter any problems with this? I’d be using CCK2 for deployment, but I’d also like to hear if there were compatibility issues with any sites or web applications. -- *Jason Jackson* Computer Systems Technician North Vancouver School District ___ Enterprise mailing list Enterprise@mozilla.org <mailto:Enterprise@mozilla.org> https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/enterprise To unsubscribe from this list, please visithttps://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/enterprise or send an email toenterprise-requ...@mozilla.org <mailto:enterprise-requ...@mozilla.org> with a subject of "unsubscribe" ___ Enterprise mailing list Enterprise@mozilla.org https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/enterprise To unsubscribe from this list, please visit https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/enterprise or send an email to enterprise-requ...@mozilla.org with a subject of "unsubscribe"
Re: [Mozilla Enterprise] Anyone migrate to 64-bit?
We deploy via batch scripts, and I migrated all our Windows clients to 64-bit around 52.4 or so. So far nobody has complained that I am aware of. jim On 2/8/2018 10:56 AM, Jason Jackson wrote: For those of you who migrated your organization to 64-bit Firefox, did you encounter any problems with this? I’d be using CCK2 for deployment, but I’d also like to hear if there were compatibility issues with any sites or web applications. -- *Jason Jackson* Computer Systems Technician North Vancouver School District ___ Enterprise mailing list Enterprise@mozilla.org https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/enterprise To unsubscribe from this list, please visit https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/enterprise or send an email to enterprise-requ...@mozilla.org with a subject of "unsubscribe" ___ Enterprise mailing list Enterprise@mozilla.org https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/enterprise To unsubscribe from this list, please visit https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/enterprise or send an email to enterprise-requ...@mozilla.org with a subject of "unsubscribe"
Re: [Mozilla Enterprise] [BULK] [MKTG] Re: 52.5.2 and OSX 10.12 bookmarks bug?
This particular Mac is not loading any internal sites, all websites are purely external. jim On 12/28/2017 10:27 AM, Jesse Pina wrote: Is this an internal site or external? Jesse Pina | Desktop Engineer | WellMed Medical Management, Inc. Telephone: 210-955-6470 ext 56470 | http://www.WellMedHealthcare.com -Original Message- From: Enterprise [mailto:enterprise-boun...@mozilla.org] On Behalf Of Jim Weill Sent: Thursday, December 28, 2017 12:26 PM To: enterprise@mozilla.org Subject: [BULK] [MKTG] Re: [Mozilla Enterprise] 52.5.2 and OSX 10.12 bookmarks bug? Importance: Low This is still happening. I can workaround by hitting refresh when the URL changes, or re-clicking the bookmark. It seems to be restricted to a single tab, as opening a new tab works to load the page properly the first time. But if I remain in that same tab, at some point the behavior returns where the URL changes but the new page fails to load. One person has written me off-list to say they have the same problem. jim On 12/12/2017 9:16 AM, Jim Weill wrote: I have had a problem on OSX 10.12 where clicking a bookmark from the bookmarks menu or toolbar does not load the site, but does change the URL in the address bar. Clicking the bookmark again, or clicking the reload button loads the site I was trying to get to. Has anyone else seen this? It does not happen every time, but easily more than half the time I click the bookmark link this behavior occurs. jim ___ Enterprise mailing list Enterprise@mozilla.org https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/enterprise To unsubscribe from this list, please visit https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/enterprise or send an email to enterprise-requ...@mozilla.org with a subject of "unsubscribe" ___ Enterprise mailing list Enterprise@mozilla.org https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/enterprise To unsubscribe from this list, please visit https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/enterprise or send an email to enterprise-requ...@mozilla.org with a subject of "unsubscribe" ___ Enterprise mailing list Enterprise@mozilla.org https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/enterprise To unsubscribe from this list, please visit https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/enterprise or send an email to enterprise-requ...@mozilla.org with a subject of "unsubscribe"
Re: [Mozilla Enterprise] 52.5.2 and OSX 10.12 bookmarks bug?
This is still happening. I can workaround by hitting refresh when the URL changes, or re-clicking the bookmark. It seems to be restricted to a single tab, as opening a new tab works to load the page properly the first time. But if I remain in that same tab, at some point the behavior returns where the URL changes but the new page fails to load. One person has written me off-list to say they have the same problem. jim On 12/12/2017 9:16 AM, Jim Weill wrote: I have had a problem on OSX 10.12 where clicking a bookmark from the bookmarks menu or toolbar does not load the site, but does change the URL in the address bar. Clicking the bookmark again, or clicking the reload button loads the site I was trying to get to. Has anyone else seen this? It does not happen every time, but easily more than half the time I click the bookmark link this behavior occurs. jim ___ Enterprise mailing list Enterprise@mozilla.org https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/enterprise To unsubscribe from this list, please visit https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/enterprise or send an email to enterprise-requ...@mozilla.org with a subject of "unsubscribe" ___ Enterprise mailing list Enterprise@mozilla.org https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/enterprise To unsubscribe from this list, please visit https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/enterprise or send an email to enterprise-requ...@mozilla.org with a subject of "unsubscribe"
[Mozilla Enterprise] 52.5.2 and OSX 10.12 bookmarks bug?
I have had a problem on OSX 10.12 where clicking a bookmark from the bookmarks menu or toolbar does not load the site, but does change the URL in the address bar. Clicking the bookmark again, or clicking the reload button loads the site I was trying to get to. Has anyone else seen this? It does not happen every time, but easily more than half the time I click the bookmark link this behavior occurs. jim ___ Enterprise mailing list Enterprise@mozilla.org https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/enterprise To unsubscribe from this list, please visit https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/enterprise or send an email to enterprise-requ...@mozilla.org with a subject of "unsubscribe"
Re: [Mozilla Enterprise] Slow pages in ESR 52.2.1 (64bit)
I had this issue on my iMac with firefox hogging 150% cpu and 2GB of RAM. It was most noticeable on sites with vertical scrolling. Updating to the latest flash player mitigated this, but I still regularly see consistent 30-50% cpu with more than 1GB RAM. Firefox slows down considerably for a few seconds for me now rather than minutes before I updated to the latest flash. jim On 7/25/2017 2:42 AM, Marquis Peter wrote: There seem to be a memory leak somewhere in the code, FF is using 1.3Gb ram and 40-50% cpu when running the same tabs/add-ons last week it was only using 3-400Mb and less than 10% cpu Trying to get some HTTP logs, but FF is nigh-on unusable Kind Regards, Peter Marquis Technical Security Officer -Information Governance & Cyber Security IT Department - Harton Wing - South Tyneside District Hospital Have you received an Email that does not look Right? DO NOT reply, DO NOT click any links, REPORT it to The Cyber Security Team (suspect.em...@stft.nhs.uk) See STFT intranet -> Information Governance & Data Security -> Email -> Suspect Email Handling or click the link: http://intranet/intranet_pot/6321.pdf for the procedure. -Original Message- From: Enterprise [mailto:enterprise-boun...@mozilla.org] On Behalf Of enterprise-requ...@mozilla.org Sent: 25 July 2017 01:36 To: enterprise@mozilla.org Subject: Enterprise Digest, Vol 73, Issue 14 To unsubscribe via the web interface, visit https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/enterprise or, via email, send a message with a subject or body of 'unsubscribe' to enterprise-requ...@mozilla.org Send Enterprise mailing list submissions to enterprise@mozilla.org You can reach the person managing the list at enterprise-ow...@mozilla.org When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of Enterprise digest..." Today's Topics: 1. Re: Super slow pages after update from 45.9->52.1 ESR (Lawrence Mandel) 2. Re: Super slow pages after update from 45.9->52.1 ESR (Lawrence Mandel) 3. Re: Super slow pages after update from 45.9->52.1 ESR (Jim Weill) 4. Re: Super slow pages after update from 45.9->52.1 ESR (Hendrik Noack) 5. Re: Super slow pages after update from 45.9->52.1 ESR (Lawrence Mandel) 6. Re: Super slow pages after update from 45.9->52.1 ESR (Scott Dodgson) -- Message: 1 Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2017 12:10:58 -0400 From: Lawrence Mandel <lman...@mozilla.com> To: Andrew C Aitchison <and...@aitchison.me.uk> Cc: enterprise owner <enterprise@mozilla.org> Subject: Re: [Mozilla Enterprise] Super slow pages after update from 45.9->52.1 ESR Message-ID:
Re: [Mozilla Enterprise] Super slow pages after update from 45.9->52.1 ESR
My generated logs are far larger than the bug report can upload -- four
files were created that all come in at 45+ MB each. Compressing them
results in an 18MB zip file, which is still too large, even for email.
How do I upload these logs?
jim
On 7/24/2017 10:37 AM, Lawrence Mandel wrote:
I didn't say how to get your logs to Mozilla. Here are two ways:
1. Post your logs to Bugzilla. Use
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1370629
<https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1370629>
2. Email your logs to me privately. Please let me know if you're OK
with me posting your logs to Bugzilla. If not, I'll share them with
the developers directly and ask that they be deleted when we're done
analyzing them.
Thanks,
Lawrence
On Mon, Jul 24, 2017 at 12:10 PM, Lawrence Mandel <lman...@mozilla.com
<mailto:lman...@mozilla.com>> wrote:
Given the report about this still being an issue in 52.2.1 we're
still investigating. The developers have requested an http log
from someone who is able to reproduce the issue. Details on
creating an http log at are
https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Mozilla/Debugging/HTTP_logging#Using_aboutnetworking
<https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Mozilla/Debugging/HTTP_logging#Using_aboutnetworking>
Thanks,
Lawrence
On Sat, Jul 1, 2017 at 9:15 AM, Andrew C Aitchison
<and...@aitchison.me.uk <mailto:and...@aitchison.me.uk>> wrote:
Or, could the delay be some DNS lookup which times out ?
Firefox has its own DNS cache (which can be overridden).
Maybe the switch to multi-threading has done something to the
DNS handling ?
On Sat, 1 Jul 2017, stein.wm wrote:
Perhaps it's the Virus Protection. E. g. on my PC a new
version of Avira (after last product update from
2017-June-02) now tries to sent requests home with every
suspection or internet request. If the firewall blocks
this, the virus protection delays the start of the
intercepted module for a trial period of about half a minute.
But this effect should also occur with other software, it
is not limited to the new Firefox version.
stein.wm
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Enterprise [mailto:enterprise-boun...@mozilla.org
<mailto:enterprise-boun...@mozilla.org>] Im Auftrag von
Remy Molenaar
Gesendet: Samstag, 1. Juli 2017 08:50
An: Jim Weill
Cc: enterprise@mozilla.org <mailto:enterprise@mozilla.org>
Betreff: Re: [Mozilla Enterprise] Super slow pages after
update from 45.9->52.1 ESR
I have that problem also with the official version. I'm
still not sure what the problem is. I've noticed that it
occurs only with internet pages, none internal. First I
thought it was my ad blocker. But I did a clean install
(with clean profile) and having the issue back again.
I'm on Windows 7 Pro btw.
Remy
Op 30 jun. 2017 om 19:23 heeft Jim Weill
<moon...@icsi.berkeley.edu
<mailto:moon...@icsi.berkeley.edu>> het volgende geschreven:
I don't know about anyone else, but I am still
having the slowness issue with Firefox, even after
upgrading to the (unannounced) 52.2.1 release. For this
reason I am pushing Chrome to our users because we cannot
keep having random page timeouts slowing us down like this.
I cannot find a way to recreate the issue, other
than at least once per hour the whole browser stops
loading pages and it takes anywhere from 30-60 seconds
before I can use firefox again. I can open new tabs and
start trying to load pages, but none of them load until
whatever is bottle-necking the browser finally releases.
jim
On 6/6/2017 11:50 AM, Lawrence Mandel wrote:
Thanks Samuel. As a follow up, I have
filed https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1370629
<https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1370629>
Lawrence
On Fri, May 19, 2017 at 9:22 AM, Samuel
Ambaye <samuel.amb...@oakfnd.ch
<mailto:samuel.amb...@oakfnd.ch>> wrote:
We noticed the issue when one of
our users reported a similar issue following a minor
version ESR update:
Using FF 45.9.0.6310 & Windows 7.
(1) Start FF
(2) goto this URL
Re: [Mozilla Enterprise] Super slow pages after update from 45.9->52.1 ESR
I don't know about anyone else, but I am still having the slowness issue
with Firefox, even after upgrading to the (unannounced) 52.2.1 release.
For this reason I am pushing Chrome to our users because we cannot keep
having random page timeouts slowing us down like this.
I cannot find a way to recreate the issue, other than at least once per
hour the whole browser stops loading pages and it takes anywhere from
30-60 seconds before I can use firefox again. I can open new tabs and
start trying to load pages, but none of them load until whatever is
bottle-necking the browser finally releases.
jim
On 6/6/2017 11:50 AM, Lawrence Mandel wrote:
Thanks Samuel. As a follow up, I have filed
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1370629
Lawrence
On Fri, May 19, 2017 at 9:22 AM, Samuel Ambaye
<samuel.amb...@oakfnd.ch <mailto:samuel.amb...@oakfnd.ch>> wrote:
We noticed the issue when one of our users reported a similar
issue following a minor version ESR update:
Using FF 45.9.0.6310 & Windows 7.
(1) Start FF
(2) goto this URL www.lematin.ch <http://www.lematin.ch>
(newspaper in Geneva, Switzerland)
Results: Browser waits for the page to load for two-three minutes
to load (but would actually load);
Results: Other browsers, No issue;
(4) Close browser
Browser hangs and requires a kill process.
(5) Restart Browser and Try different web sites, even ones that
were ok before;
Results: Browser waits for web site for over two / three minutes;
(5) Kill Process, Restart browser and repeat step 2 and 5:
Same Result;
(6) Kill Process, Replace FF user profile and repeat step 2 and 5:
Same Result;
(7) Uninstall FF for users who were affected; Install FF 52.1.0.6316
Issue no longer reproducible
We hope this helps.
Best,
Samuel
>>> Jim Weill <moon...@icsi.berkeley.edu
<mailto:moon...@icsi.berkeley.edu>> 19/05/2017 00:17 >>>
I notice the issue when I first open FF in the morning on Windows
7 Pro
x64 machines. After that I cannot come up with a reliable way to
reproduce this issue, other than it happens at random times throughout
the day.
I do not notice this on Mac OSX 10.12 at all (we have a few of these).
And I have not polled our Linux users on this issue, so I do not know
where that stands.
Is there something in the dev tools that I can leave open when this
happens again to try to narrow this down? I've had this happen
several
times today already.
jim
On 5/11/2017 11:51 AM, Phil Pishioneri wrote:
> On 5/11/17 2:06 PM, Julien Cristau wrote:
>> we've filed a bug at
>> https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1361865
<https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1361865> to investigate
>> the issue reported in this thread. Unfortunately so far we haven't
>> been able to reproduce this internally. Does anyone on this thread
>> have a reliable way to reproduce the problem you've seen? If
this is
>> also reproducible with the non-ESR Firefox releases, knowing which
>> version introduced it would also help narrow down the search.
>
> I've had very reproducible delays since (non-ESR) release 48. I
found
> it related to syncing of my (large) bookmarks. Whenever the sync
> process starts (this can be "random", especially if a Firefox is
> active on another host syncing to the same account), Firefox's UI
> locks up for a few seconds. On a Mac, I get the spinning beach ball;
> on Windows, I'll get the window title bar message about the process
> not responding; I don't recall the behavior on Linux, other than
> Firefox becomes unresponsive. Creating a new bookmark also starts a
> sync (and, it'll start while the "Bookmark This Page" window is
open).
>
> My circumvention was to find the host name being used for my
sync, and
> put in an override in my client's hosts file that maps the name to
> loopback 127.0.0.1, then commenting that out and manually starting a
> sync when I need it (then uncomment it again afterward).
>
> My multiprocess status is off on all of these platforms due to
> incompatible extensions.
>
> -Phil
> ___
> Enterprise mailing list
> Enterprise@mozilla.org <mailto:Enterprise@mozilla.org>
> https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/enterprise
<https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/enterprise>
>
> To unsubscribe from this list, please visit
> https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/enterprise
<https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/enterprise> or send an email to
> enterprise-requ...@mozilla.org
&
Re: [Mozilla Enterprise] Super slow pages after update from 45.9->52.1 ESR
I notice the issue when I first open FF in the morning on Windows 7 Pro x64 machines. After that I cannot come up with a reliable way to reproduce this issue, other than it happens at random times throughout the day. I do not notice this on Mac OSX 10.12 at all (we have a few of these). And I have not polled our Linux users on this issue, so I do not know where that stands. Is there something in the dev tools that I can leave open when this happens again to try to narrow this down? I've had this happen several times today already. jim On 5/11/2017 11:51 AM, Phil Pishioneri wrote: On 5/11/17 2:06 PM, Julien Cristau wrote: we've filed a bug at https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1361865 to investigate the issue reported in this thread. Unfortunately so far we haven't been able to reproduce this internally. Does anyone on this thread have a reliable way to reproduce the problem you've seen? If this is also reproducible with the non-ESR Firefox releases, knowing which version introduced it would also help narrow down the search. I've had very reproducible delays since (non-ESR) release 48. I found it related to syncing of my (large) bookmarks. Whenever the sync process starts (this can be "random", especially if a Firefox is active on another host syncing to the same account), Firefox's UI locks up for a few seconds. On a Mac, I get the spinning beach ball; on Windows, I'll get the window title bar message about the process not responding; I don't recall the behavior on Linux, other than Firefox becomes unresponsive. Creating a new bookmark also starts a sync (and, it'll start while the "Bookmark This Page" window is open). My circumvention was to find the host name being used for my sync, and put in an override in my client's hosts file that maps the name to loopback 127.0.0.1, then commenting that out and manually starting a sync when I need it (then uncomment it again afterward). My multiprocess status is off on all of these platforms due to incompatible extensions. -Phil ___ Enterprise mailing list Enterprise@mozilla.org https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/enterprise To unsubscribe from this list, please visit https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/enterprise or send an email to enterprise-requ...@mozilla.org with a subject of "unsubscribe" ___ Enterprise mailing list Enterprise@mozilla.org https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/enterprise To unsubscribe from this list, please visit https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/enterprise or send an email to enterprise-requ...@mozilla.org with a subject of "unsubscribe"
Re: [Mozilla Enterprise] Super slow pages after update from 45.9->52.1 ESR
I downloaded the win32 version from the link below but I do not know how to tell if I am using the version it says it is? Either way I am still having issues on my own machine with this build, I have not pushed it out to everyone else. jim On 4/27/2017 6:37 AM, Максим Бритов wrote: 26.04.2017 00:29, Jim Weill пишет: I have been experiencing a problem with web pages refusing to load for more than 60 seconds in some cases since updating to the newest version of the 52.x track. My office internet is a 1Gbps incoming line, of which I usually get no less than 10Mbps when there is high traffic on the line. Could you check 52.1.0rc-build1? http://archive.mozilla.org/pub/firefox/candidates/52.1.0esr-candidates/build1/ For my test user (G4400/win10-annw-x64) build1 works fine. Build2 and later not. I am finding that such disparate sites as google, facebook, and other high-reliability sites sit and spin at random times throughout the day. If I open a command line and ping that site, I get a ping time of 3-10ms and very little deviation from the time on a continuous ping (i.e. no single ping taking more than the time specified, or nslookup errors, etc). Yet the site sits and spins for far too long before eventually loading correctly. Is there a preference I have set wrong that's causing this, or is this behavior also being noticed by anyone else on this release track? ___ Enterprise mailing list Enterprise@mozilla.org https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/enterprise To unsubscribe from this list, please visit https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/enterprise or send an email to enterprise-requ...@mozilla.org with a subject of "unsubscribe" ___ Enterprise mailing list Enterprise@mozilla.org https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/enterprise To unsubscribe from this list, please visit https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/enterprise or send an email to enterprise-requ...@mozilla.org with a subject of "unsubscribe"
Re: [Mozilla Enterprise] Super slow pages after update from 45.9->52.1 ESR
I tried bringing up a local wiki we have on a server internal to our network, and even that page took well over 30+ seconds to load. We've been avoiding adding Chrome to our managed software list, but this experience has me re-considering it, honestly. jim On 4/25/2017 6:38 PM, Stephanie Daugherty wrote: Pages have also become a lot "heavier" with massive javascript libraries, AJAX, higher resolution images, and the like. Given that developers tend to have powerful machines, and testers may only test with a few tabs open, a lot of this slips by. Web pages these days are applications in their own right, and like any other application, as more resources become available, instead of those resources making the applications run faster, the developers use the resources to squeeze more bloat into the applications. ___ Enterprise mailing list Enterprise@mozilla.org https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/enterprise To unsubscribe from this list, please visit https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/enterprise or send an email to enterprise-requ...@mozilla.org with a subject of "unsubscribe"
Re: [Mozilla Enterprise] Super slow pages after update from 45.9->52.1 ESR
On 4/25/2017 2:44 PM, Stephen Dowdy wrote: I saw references to Adobe Flashplayer being responsible for this, and lo/behold, upon switching Flashplayer to "Never Activate", the Gtk/Gdk messages stopped. I then disabled Flashplayer in all of my other profiles , and my Atlassian Confluence tabs suddenly became usable again. (instead of 30 seconds of grinding waiting to edit a page or authenticate, it took no more than 4-5 seconds). While i'm massively disappointed in the performance still (yeah, partly the freakin' web and it's abundance of dazzle/privacy-theft sites), it turns out that Flashplayer being active for a single tab was killing my system. I will say that the sites which have flash installed and/or running were closed when I made my initial post (but the original process was still open), and I was having trouble waiting for one of my folders in gmail to open -- it took 53 seconds to go from "inbox" in gmail to a subfolder/label. I do notice that firefox takes up well over 750MB of memory when I check the process and I know the bulk of that is due to flash, but I'll give disabling flash a try. I do run Flashblock extension, but some pages still try loading video under the blocked flash container anyway >:-\ jim ___ Enterprise mailing list Enterprise@mozilla.org https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/enterprise To unsubscribe from this list, please visit https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/enterprise or send an email to enterprise-requ...@mozilla.org with a subject of "unsubscribe"
[Mozilla Enterprise] Super slow pages after update from 45.9->52.1 ESR
I have been experiencing a problem with web pages refusing to load for more than 60 seconds in some cases since updating to the newest version of the 52.x track. My office internet is a 1Gbps incoming line, of which I usually get no less than 10Mbps when there is high traffic on the line. I am finding that such disparate sites as google, facebook, and other high-reliability sites sit and spin at random times throughout the day. If I open a command line and ping that site, I get a ping time of 3-10ms and very little deviation from the time on a continuous ping (i.e. no single ping taking more than the time specified, or nslookup errors, etc). Yet the site sits and spins for far too long before eventually loading correctly. Is there a preference I have set wrong that's causing this, or is this behavior also being noticed by anyone else on this release track? jim ___ Enterprise mailing list Enterprise@mozilla.org https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/enterprise To unsubscribe from this list, please visit https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/enterprise or send an email to enterprise-requ...@mozilla.org with a subject of "unsubscribe"
Re: [Mozilla Enterprise] take me off your list
Sorry, requests to be taken off list must provide sources and data. See, for example: http://read.seas.harvard.edu/~kohler/pubs/mazieres05get.pdf On 3/8/2017 9:04 AM, John Hoepfner wrote: Take me off your list ___ Enterprise mailing list Enterprise@mozilla.org https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/enterprise To unsubscribe from this list, please visit https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/enterprise or send an email to enterprise-requ...@mozilla.org with a subject of "unsubscribe" ___ Enterprise mailing list Enterprise@mozilla.org https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/enterprise To unsubscribe from this list, please visit https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/enterprise or send an email to enterprise-requ...@mozilla.org with a subject of "unsubscribe"
