[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 6 updates-testing report

The following builds have been pushed to Fedora EPEL 6 updates-testing ncdu-1.14.1-1.el6 Details about builds: ncdu-1.14.1-1.el6 (FEDORA-EPEL-2019-b2627c8def) Text-based disk usage viewer

[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 7 updates-testing report

The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing: Age URL 362 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2018-3c9292b62d condor-8.6.11-1.el7 138 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2019-d2c1368294 cinnamon-3.6.7-5.el7 104

[EPEL-devel] Re: Python 3 packages to be removed form EPEL 7 (provided by RHEL 7)

On 11. 08. 19 20:41, Tuomo Soini wrote: On Fri, 9 Aug 2019 17:39:45 +0200 Miro Hrončok wrote: On 09. 08. 19 17:38, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: I tested all three and gave karma. Thanks. I'll wait for the push and retire the old packages. I hope everything will work as expected. I

[EPEL-devel] Re: Python 3 packages to be removed form EPEL 7 (provided by RHEL 7)

On Fri, 9 Aug 2019 17:39:45 +0200 Miro Hrončok wrote: > On 09. 08. 19 17:38, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > > > > > > I tested all three and gave karma. > > Thanks. I'll wait for the push and retire the old packages. > > I hope everything will work as expected. > I noticed a issue,

[EPEL-devel] Re: how to use epel8-playground?

On 8/8/19 11:40 AM, Dave Dykstra wrote: > Stephen, > > The package is singularity. > > The term "branch" in this context is not very clear to me. All I know > is that there's no git branch on pkgs.fedoraproject.org/rpms/singularity; > I don't know about other systems. What version of fedpkg do

[EPEL-devel] Re: Is Koschei using CentOS 7 in the EPEL 7 resolve check?

If it helps Copr (and mock) use centos 7 [1] [1] https://github.com/rpm-software-management/mock/blob/master/mock-core-configs/etc/mock/epel-7-x86_64.cfg On Sun, 2019-08-11 at 10:44 +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote: > See for example: > >

[EPEL-devel] Re: Python 3.6: RHEL 7.7 vs. CentOS 7.6 EPEL7 retirement problem

On Sun, 11 Aug 2019 at 03:32, Miro Hrončok wrote: > On 11. 08. 19 2:58, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > > On Sat, 10 Aug 2019 at 17:12, Miro Hrončok > > wrote: > > > > On 10. 08. 19 21:23, Miro Hrončok wrote: > > > While I really tried to do my best, it seems

[EPEL-devel] Re: Is Koschei using CentOS 7 in the EPEL 7 resolve check?

I think it uses koji build repo. So same as epel buildroot does. On Sun, Aug 11, 2019, 10:47 Miro Hrončok wrote: > See for example: > > > https://apps.fedoraproject.org/koschei/package/python-mccabe?collection=epel7 > 2019-08-11 >

[EPEL-devel] Re: Python 3.6: RHEL 7.7 vs. CentOS 7.6 EPEL7 retirement problem

On 10. 08. 19 21:23, Miro Hrončok wrote: While I really tried to do my best, it seems that I broke CentOS by retiring python36. Should it be unretired? Or is it reasonable to say: Please wait for CentOS 7.7? https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1739804 Currently I cannot even init an

[EPEL-devel] Re: Python 3.6: RHEL 7.7 vs. CentOS 7.6 EPEL7 retirement problem

On 11. 08. 19 9:59, Mohan Boddu wrote: I unretired the packages and tagged the old builds, I think that should fix the buildroot and got a testing build working. Thanks, now. Assuming Koji sees RHEL 7.7, can we somehow: - keep the packages in the repos - but make Koji prefer the RHEL ones

[EPEL-devel] Is Koschei using CentOS 7 in the EPEL 7 resolve check?

See for example: https://apps.fedoraproject.org/koschei/package/python-mccabe?collection=epel7 2019-08-11 07:50:11 - nothing provides python(abi) = 3.6 ... This is provided in RHEL 7.7. (Note that we've unretired the python36 package, so later it resolved correctly.) -- Miro Hrončok --

[EPEL-devel] Re: Python 3.6: RHEL 7.7 vs. CentOS 7.6 EPEL7 retirement problem

I unretired the packages and tagged the old builds, I think that should fix the buildroot and got a testing build working. On Sun, Aug 11, 2019 at 3:29 AM Miro Hrončok wrote: > On 11. 08. 19 2:58, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > > On Sat, 10 Aug 2019 at 17:12, Miro Hrončok >

[EPEL-devel] Re: Python 3.6: RHEL 7.7 vs. CentOS 7.6 EPEL7 retirement problem

On 11. 08. 19 2:58, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: On Sat, 10 Aug 2019 at 17:12, Miro Hrončok > wrote: On 10. 08. 19 21:23, Miro Hrončok wrote: > While I really tried to do my best, it seems that I broke CentOS by retiring > python36. Should it be