Depending on the network rules and other resources, it may be easier to do
the following:
1. Make changes or additional specific template changes to use specific
servers which will limit failover (aka dl.fedoraproject.org for epel and
fedora packages)
2. Mirror the distro and other resources you
ply to spam, report it:
> https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
>
--
Stephen Smoogen, Red Hat Automotive
Let us be kind to one another, for most of us are fighting a hard battle.
-- Ian MacClaren
___
epel-devel mailing list --
ode of Conduct:
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives:
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Do not reply to spam, re
project.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives:
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Do not reply to spam, report it:
> https://pagure.io/fedora-infra
8.0-6.el9.src.rpm)
Config(epel-9-x86_64) 0 minutes 36 seconds
INFO: Results and/or logs in:
/home/ssmoogen/Fedora/screen/results_screen/4.8.0/6.el9
INFO: Cleaning up build root ('cleanup_on_success=True')
Start: clean chroot
Finish: clean chroot
Finish: run
`
://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Do not reply to spam, report it:
> https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
>
--
Stephen Smoogen, Red Hat Automotive
Let us be kind to one another, for most of us are fighting a hard battle.
-- Ian Ma
ines
> List Archives:
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Do not reply to spam, report it:
> https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
>
--
Stephen Smoogen, Red Hat Automotive
Let us be kind to one another, for
On Fri, 14 Apr 2023 at 12:37, Emmanuel Seyman wrote:
> * Stephen Smoogen [14/04/2023 12:20] :
> >
> > I would like someone else to take over this package and will either add
> > someone or orphan this in the coming 2 weeks.
>
> I will gladly take it (fas name: ese
someone or orphan this in the coming 2 weeks.
Thank you
--
Stephen Smoogen, Red Hat Automotive
Let us be kind to one another, for most of us are fighting a hard battle.
-- Ian MacClaren
___
epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
ling_list_guidelines
> List Archives:
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Do not reply to spam, report it:
> https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
>
--
Stephen Smoogen, Red Hat Automotive
Let us be kind to one another, for mos
oject.org
> Do not reply to spam, report it:
> https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
>
--
Stephen Smoogen, Red Hat Automotive
Let us be kind to one another, for most of us are fighting a hard battle.
-- Ian MacClaren
___
ep
nd in 8 broke down
on (2) Fedora packagers not having the capacity to deal with different
workflows and (1) infrastructure limits. EPEL-Next seems to be running into
1, 2 and 3.
--
Stephen Smoogen, Red Hat Automotive
Let us be kind to one another, for most of us are fighting a hard battle.
-- Ian MacClaren
___
reply to spam, report it:
> https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
>
--
Stephen Smoogen, Red Hat Automotive
Let us be kind to one another, for most of us are fighting a hard battle.
-- Ian MacClaren
___
epel-devel mailing list
tic in LTO mode with #pragma GCC
target("cpu=power10")
<https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2140266>
digikam builds fail with gcc 11.3.1-4 (target specific option mismatch)
<https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2159428>
--
Stephen Smoogen, Red Hat
://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Do not reply to spam, report it:
> https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
>
--
Stephen Smoogen, Red Hat Automotive
Let us be kind to one another, for most of us are fighting a hard battle.
-- Ian MacClare
] Minutes (text):
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2022-12-14/epel.2022-12-14-20.59.txt
[2022-12-14-16:47] Log:
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2022-12-14/epel.2022-12-14-20.59.log.html
Next meeting is 2022-12-21
--
Stephen Smoogen, Red Hat Automotive
Let us be kind
> List Archives:
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Do not reply to spam, report it:
> https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
>
--
Stephen Smoogen, Red Hat Automotive
Let us be kind to one another, for most of us a
d not install the epel version at all, right?
>
> Have you tried adding `module_hotfixes=true` [1] to the EPEL repo
> configuration file (/etc/yum.repos.d/epel.repo IIRC)?
>
>
> [1]:
> https://dnf.readthedocs.io/en/latest/modularity.html#hotfix-repositories
It isn't going to help. Th
code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives:
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Do not reply to spam, report it:
> https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
>
On Sun, 27 Nov 2022 at 14:32, Richard Fearn wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> In July 2021 I retired the FindBugs packages from Fedora:
>
>
Thanks for announcing the retirement and giving a good example for how
people should do so in the future.
--
Stephen Smoogen, Red Hat Automotive
Let us
tinue to work without recompiling
If you compile a new zlib then you may need to recompile it but also every
other spec that requires zlib-devel.
--
Stephen Smoogen, Red Hat Automotive
Let us be kind to one another, for most of us are fighting a hard battle.
-- Ian MacClaren
__
On Tue, 1 Nov 2022 at 07:48, Andrew C Aitchison
wrote:
> On Tue, 1 Nov 2022, Stephen Smoogen wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 1 Nov 2022 at 06:59, Nick Howitt via epel-devel <
> > epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> >
> >> Yesterday, ClamAV announced CV
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives:
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Do not reply to spam, report it:
> https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
>
--
Stephen Smoo
On Tue, 11 Oct 2022 at 14:34, Troy Dawson wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 6, 2022 at 8:50 AM Stephen Smoogen
> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Wed, 31 Aug 2022 at 17:08, Stephen Smoogen
>> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> When EPEL-8 was launched, it came with some supp
roject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct:
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives:
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
>
ct.org/
>
> I agree this should be said there.
>
>
mailman3 ate the emails announcing the change. I have hopefully fixed that
the email announcing it was accepted.
--
Stephen Smoogen, Red Hat Automotive
Let us be kind to one another, for most of us are fighting a hard battle.
-- Ian M
On Wed, 31 Aug 2022 at 17:08, Stephen Smoogen wrote:
>
> When EPEL-8 was launched, it came with some support for modules with the
> hope that a module ecosystem could be built from Fedora packages using RHEL
> modules as an underlying tool. This has never happened and we h
k for your system, but I am
not sure how to pinpoint what it is for better documentation. If you can
repeat the problem and see what difference in install from what I tried is,
we can better do this.
--
Stephen Smoogen, Red Hat Automotive
Let us be kind to one another, for mos
>
> Total size: 18 k
> Installed size: 25 k
> Downloading Packages:
> Public key for epel-release-latest-9.noarch.rpm is not installed
> Error: GPG check FAILED
>
>
> Nicholas Jahn
> IT professional
> A.S. Network Specialist (www.madisoncollege.edu)
>
3570%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C=2J2gvl6%2B1hAD9LpY4gcVlWZTtTi3HBd5q9rR615A1KU%3D=0>
> Do not reply to spam, report it:
> https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
> <https://nam12.safelinks.protection.outlook.co
elines
> List Archives:
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Do not reply to spam, report it:
> https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
>
--
Stephen Smoogen, Red Hat Automotive
Let us be kind to one another, for mos
modules for EL8.
6. Make changes in PDC for EL8 modules
7. Make changes in compose scripts and tools to no longer cover EPEL-8
modules
8. Remove epel-8 modules from /pub/epel/8
9. Announce closure of this proposal and any lessons learned.
--
Stephen Smoogen, Red Hat Automotive
Let us be kind to one
ron320
--
Stephen Smoogen, Red Hat Automotive
Let us be kind to one another, for most of us are fighting a hard battle.
-- Ian MacClaren
___
epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to epel-de
On Fri, 9 Sept 2022 at 09:14, Josh Boyer wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 9, 2022 at 8:40 AM Stephen Smoogen
> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > On Fri, 9 Sept 2022 at 08:09, lejeczek via CentOS-devel <
> centos-de...@centos.org> wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi
On Thu, 8 Sept 2022 at 09:54, Stephen Smoogen wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, 8 Sept 2022 at 02:56, Jaroslav Mracek
> wrote:
>
>> I am curios - Is there any benefit of the proposal for end users? I think
>> that end users are the most important part of the chain - be honest
_guidelines
> List Archives:
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Do not reply to spam, report it:
> https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
>
--
Stephen Smoogen, Red Hat Autom
On Wed, 7 Sept 2022 at 10:04, Petr Pisar wrote:
> V Wed, Aug 31, 2022 at 05:08:59PM -0400, Stephen Smoogen napsal(a):
> > When EPEL-8 was launched, it came with some support for modules with the
> > hope that a module ecosystem could be built from Fedora packages using
>
On Thu, 1 Sept 2022 at 12:25, Troy Dawson wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Sep 1, 2022 at 12:19 AM Miro Hrončok wrote:
>
>> On 31. 08. 22 23:08, Stephen Smoogen wrote:
>> >
>> > When EPEL-8 was launched, it came with some support for modules with
>> the hope
>&g
On Wed, 31 Aug 2022 at 17:08, Stephen Smoogen wrote:
>
> When EPEL-8 was launched, it came with some support for modules with the
> hope that a module ecosystem could be built from Fedora packages using RHEL
> modules as an underlying tool. This has never happened and we h
modules
8. Remove epel-8 modules from /pub/epel/8
9. Announce closure of this proposal and any lessons learned.
--
Stephen Smoogen, Red Hat Automotive
Let us be kind to one another, for most of us are fighting a hard battle.
-- Ian MacClaren
___
epel-devel
On Tue, 5 Jul 2022 at 08:07, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> On Tue, 2022-07-05 at 13:00 +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> > On 05. 07. 22 12:43, Stephen Smoogen wrote:
> > > You will need to work with the upstream RHEL team to see if they
> > > can update
> > > py
t; List Archives:
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Do not reply to spam on the list, report it:
> https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
>
--
Stephen Smoogen, Red Hat Automotive
Let us be kind to one another, for most of us
ist_guidelines
>> List Archives:
>> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
>> Do not reply to spam on the list, report it:
>> https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
>>
> ___
>
gt; epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct:
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailin
On Sat, Jun 4, 2022 at 21:17 Manuel Wolfshant
wrote:
> On 6/5/22 03:47, Stephen Smoogen wrote:
>
>
>
> On Sat, 4 Jun 2022 at 18:54, Neal Gompa wrote:
>
>> On Sat, Jun 4, 2022 at 10:52 PM Troy Dawson wrote:
>> >
>> > When I first created the EPEL issu
ed in by default and requires epel-release. Thus you
could tell people to install `epel-release-enable-crb` and would get
packages and if people have reports of broken packages you tell them to
install this which will do the correct repo changes.
--
Stephen Smoogen, Red Hat Automotive
Let us be
rchives/list/epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Do not reply to spam on the list, report it:
> https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
>
--
Stephen Smoogen, Red Hat Automotive
Let us be kind to one another, for most of us are fighting a hard battle.
-- Ian MacClaren
__
47 matches
Mail list logo
