[EPEL-devel] Re: Ansible in EPEL 9

2023-05-18 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Tue, May 16, 2023 at 11:05:26AM +0200, Leon Fauster via epel-devel wrote: > Am 15.05.23 um 20:50 schrieb Jonathan Wright: > > EPEL tracks RHEL, not clones. > > > > EPEL10 is likely to resolve this, however.  Ref > > https://discussion.fedoraproject.org/t/epel-10-proposal > >

[EPEL-devel] Re: Ansible in EPEL 9

2023-05-16 Thread Leon Fauster via epel-devel
Am 15.05.23 um 20:50 schrieb Jonathan Wright: EPEL tracks RHEL, not clones. EPEL10 is likely to resolve this, however.  Ref https://discussion.fedoraproject.org/t/epel-10-proposal On Mon, May 15, 2023 at 1:31 PM Leon Fauster via

[EPEL-devel] Re: Ansible in EPEL 9

2023-05-15 Thread Jonathan Wright via epel-devel
EPEL tracks RHEL, not clones. EPEL10 is likely to resolve this, however. Ref https://discussion.fedoraproject.org/t/epel-10-proposal On Mon, May 15, 2023 at 1:31 PM Leon Fauster via epel-devel < epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote: > Am 10.05.23 um 05:24 schrieb Maxwell G: > > Hello EPEL

[EPEL-devel] Re: Ansible in EPEL 9

2023-05-15 Thread Leon Fauster via epel-devel
Am 10.05.23 um 05:24 schrieb Maxwell G: Hello EPEL users and developers, RHEL 9.2 was released today, so I have updated ansible in EPEL 9 from 6.3.0 to 7.2.0 to match RHEL 9.2's ansible-core bump from 2.13.3 to 2.14.2. Each ansible major version is tied to a specific major version of

[EPEL-devel] Re: Ansible in EPEL 9

2023-05-10 Thread Josh Boyer
On Tue, May 9, 2023 at 11:24 PM Maxwell G wrote: > > Hello EPEL users and developers, > > > RHEL 9.2 was released today, > so I have updated ansible in EPEL 9 from 6.3.0 to 7.2.0 to match RHEL > 9.2's ansible-core bump from 2.13.3 to 2.14.2. > Each ansible major version is tied to a specific