On Tue, Apr 26, 2022 at 7:38 AM Miro Hrončok wrote:
> On 22. 04. 22 19:53, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I've been trying to debug a segfault during %check that only occurs in
> epel9
> > Koji, but not in mock.
> >
> > At the end, I compared the list of packages with:
> >
> > $ koji
On 22. 04. 22 19:53, Miro Hrončok wrote:
Hello,
I've been trying to debug a segfault during %check that only occurs in epel9
Koji, but not in mock.
At the end, I compared the list of packages with:
$ koji list-buildroot 34845388 | sort > koji
$ mock -r centos-stream+epel-9-x86_64 shell --
Short answer: Yes
Longer Answer:
epel9 currently has what is going to be in RHEL 9.0.
CentOS Stream 9 (what you get with local mock) has several updated packages
that will be in RHEL 9.1
If you find that your packages will only build on the current CentOS STream
9, then you should build them in
On Fri, Apr 22, 2022 at 2:22 PM Miro Hrončok wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I've been trying to debug a segfault during %check that only occurs in epel9
> Koji, but not in mock.
>
> At the end, I compared the list of packages with:
>
> $ koji list-buildroot 34845388 | sort > koji
> $ mock -r
On Fri, 22 Apr 2022 at 14:22, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I've been trying to debug a segfault during %check that only occurs in
> epel9
> Koji, but not in mock.
>
> At the end, I compared the list of packages with:
>
>
> ...
> This seems like my local mock has newer c9s packages than the
On Fri, Apr 22, 2022 at 07:53:10PM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I've been trying to debug a segfault during %check that only occurs in epel9
> Koji, but not in mock.
>
> At the end, I compared the list of packages with:
...snip...
>
> This seems like my local mock has newer c9s
