Re: Object.getOwnPropertyDescriptors still at stage 0

2016-05-25 Thread Jordan Harband
For stage 4: >>> >>> o Write full tests, covering symbols, data descriptors of every >>> variation, accessors of every variation (get, get/set, set), throwing >>> getters, and proxies with throwing and inconsistent getOwnProperty and >>> own

RE: Object.getOwnPropertyDescriptors still at stage 0

2016-01-20 Thread Domenic Denicola
Giammarchi Sent: Wednesday, January 20, 2016 14:50 To: Mathias Bynens <mathi...@opera.com> Cc: es-discuss@mozilla.org Subject: Re: Object.getOwnPropertyDescriptors still at stage 0 Dear all, the current proposal is here https://github.com/WebReflection/Object.getOwnPropertyDescr

Re: Object.getOwnPropertyDescriptors still at stage 0

2016-01-20 Thread Andrea Giammarchi
Dear all, the current proposal is here https://github.com/WebReflection/Object.getOwnPropertyDescriptors#objectgetownpropertydescriptors-proposal It has been mostly copied, as suggested, from https://github.com/tc39/Array.prototype.includes It has a reference implemntation:

Re: Object.getOwnPropertyDescriptors still at stage 0

2016-01-20 Thread Andrea Giammarchi
ght not be necessary.) > > > > *From:* es-discuss [mailto:es-discuss-boun...@mozilla.org] *On Behalf Of > *Andrea > Giammarchi > *Sent:* Wednesday, January 20, 2016 14:50 > *To:* Mathias Bynens <mathi...@opera.com> > *Cc:* es-discuss@mozilla.org > *S

Re: Object.getOwnPropertyDescriptors still at stage 0

2016-01-20 Thread Jordan Harband
ers, and proxies with throwing and inconsistent getOwnProperty and >> ownPropertyKeys traps. (The proxies cases might not be necessary.) >> >> >> >> *From:* es-discuss [mailto:es-discuss-boun...@mozilla.org] *On Behalf Of >> *Andrea Giammarchi >> *Sent:*

Re: Object.getOwnPropertyDescriptors still at stage 0

2016-01-18 Thread Mathias Bynens
On Mon, Jan 18, 2016 at 6:50 PM, Andrea Giammarchi wrote: > Accordingly with this ecma262 stage 0 summary > https://github.com/tc39/ecma262/blob/master/stage0.md the (quite long time > ago) discussed `Object.getOwnPropertyDescriptors` >

Re: Object.getOwnPropertyDescriptors still at stage 0

2016-01-18 Thread Andrea Giammarchi
Thanks Mathias. Do you (or anyone else) know if that should be filed as a PR to tc39/ecma262 or if it should just be a repository eventually posted in here? On Mon, Jan 18, 2016 at 7:18 PM, Mathias Bynens wrote: > On Mon, Jan 18, 2016 at 6:50 PM, Andrea Giammarchi >

Re: Object.getOwnPropertyDescriptors still at stage 0

2016-01-18 Thread Mathias Bynens
On Mon, Jan 18, 2016 at 8:27 PM, Andrea Giammarchi wrote: > Do you (or anyone else) know if that should be filed as a PR to tc39/ecma262 > or if it should just be a repository eventually posted in here? It should be a repository that can eventually move to the tc39