Hello,
On Thursday, 8 Oct 2020 at 09:05, Dirk Eddelbuettel via ESS-help wrote:
>
> Emacs is natural follow-up to this but there is _so much_ I wanted to cover
> there that I am effectively overwhelmed and hence inactive. So let's turn
> this upsite down and maybe _just_ focus on ESS. Shall we?
That sounds fun! I have pried myself away from your t4 videos this
morning, but will look them over soon - they look great!
Best,
Tyler
Dirk Eddelbuettel writes:
On 8 October 2020 at 13:17, Ahmadou Dicko wrote:
| I do agree with your suggestion. There is much more to ESS
than I
| know and
On 8 October 2020 at 13:17, Ahmadou Dicko wrote:
| I do agree with your suggestion. There is much more to ESS than I
| know and it would be great if we could pool our resources to improve
| further.
On 8 October 2020 at 09:38, Tyler Smith via ESS-help wrote:
| I would also be interested in a
I only update my package once or twice a year, and haven't created
a new one in a while. That said, I really like the ESS/devtools
integration. I usually have to dig into the docs to remind myself
about `C-c C-o C-o` to get a new roxygen template, but that's much
less effort than refreshing
I do agree with your suggestion. There is much more to ESS than I
know and it would be great if we could pool our resources to improve
further. For my part `ess-describe-object-at-point` really improved by
workflow as it can be customized to include any function.
Indeed, it would be great to pool
Hello Kasper,
Thanks for sharing.
> Personally, I'm a dinosaur so I'm still editing Rd files myself. I must
> say, I'm not convinced about the merits of roxygen2.
I admire your discipline. For my part, I feel that I would not document my
functions properly unless I constrain myself to do it on
Hello Dirk,
On Thursday, 8 Oct 2020 at 06:57, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
> We all may be a little different here.
>
> ESS now wraps around devtools, but my practices predate devtools. So I still
> build, test, install, ... on the command-line for which I use wrappers (from
> my littler package,
Personally, I'm a dinosaur so I'm still editing Rd files myself. I must
say, I'm not convinced about the merits of roxygen2.
Having said that, I think it would make a lot of sense to have robust
solutions in ESS supporting roxygen2 and these may even exist somewhere.
On Thu, Oct 8, 2020 at 1:57
On 8 October 2020 at 13:39, Jeremie Juste via ESS-help wrote:
| Is anyone using ESS to build R packages? Could you share your workflow please?
We all may be a little different here.
ESS now wraps around devtools, but my practices predate devtools. So I still
build, test, install, ... on the
Hello,
Is anyone using ESS to build R packages? Could you share your workflow please?
I read the doc of ESS about using roxygen to document the functions.
By the way it looks like the link to [1] roxygen is broken and that
roxygen2 has taken its place.
I initially thought that I could use
10 matches
Mail list logo
