On Wed, Jan 30, 2002 at 11:13:05PM -0800, Jim Beard wrote:
That's basically dual booting between a BSD and a Linux system, which
seems a little bit silly to me,
Unless you want to compare the two, or you want to learn one but still
get a lot of work done on the other, and you can't afford
On 1/31/02 4:09 AM, Larry Price [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 30 Jan 2002, Jim Beard wrote:
On Wednesday, January 30, 2002, at 08:43 PM, Larry Price wrote:
one of those new imacs, though I'd be wanting to dual boot OS X
linuxppc
or something along those lines.
That's basically
On 1/31/02 12:44 AM, Jacob Meuser [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Jan 30, 2002 at 11:13:05PM -0800, Jim Beard wrote:
That's basically dual booting between a BSD and a Linux system, which
seems a little bit silly to me,
Unless you want to compare the two, or you want to learn one but
On 1/30/02 11:08 PM, Jim Beard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wednesday, January 30, 2002, at 07:52 PM, Harald Sundt wrote:
Mac OS X feels like a real slick (fancy featured) but clunky version
of a Mac Window Manager on Red Hat.
Really? Clunky? I can't imagine describing OS X that way
Hmm.. yes, I could do that... I could also add gnu@rocksolidnetworks, and
have Kiss my RMS as my full name. I dont think I could do
GNU/linux@rocksolidnetworks, like jacob shaw had mentioned, As far as I know,
You cant even use escape characters to do it... maybe I should setup
[EMAIL
Anyone notice a drastic slow down? It might not have been lately,
since I've been out of town, but all I'm getting these days are about
16 kBps. :(
--
Rob rob_at_euglug_dot_net
my @euglugCode = qw(v+++ e--- eug+ bsd+++ gnu+ S+++);
--- Rob Hudson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Anyone notice a drastic slow down? It might not have been lately,
since I've been out of town, but all I'm getting these days are about
16 kBps. :(
i haven't noticed any slowdowns lately, aside from normal web traffic.
=
Justin Bengtson
On Thursday, January 31, 2002, at 08:02 AM, Jacob Shaw wrote:
On 1/31/02 4:09 AM, Larry Price [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 30 Jan 2002, Jim Beard wrote:
On Wednesday, January 30, 2002, at 08:43 PM, Larry Price wrote:
one of those new imacs, though I'd be wanting to dual boot OS X
cabledsl
ports \ / all other
21,80 router ports
|
net
Routing - figures out which interface to send a packet through, based upon ip
address space.
nat - mangles packets by replacing source and destination (or other)
ip information.
default gateway
Around Thu,Jan 31 2002, at 12:08, Jim Beard, wrote:
On Thursday, January 31, 2002, at 08:02 AM, Jacob Shaw wrote:
Don't use UFS under Darwin, and especially not under OS X. A lot of
things
will break, currently.
The only problem I've had with using UFS with darwin was when I tried to
--
From: Larry Price [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [EUG-LUG:1301] Re: flame wars and GNU/Linux
Date: Wednesday, January 30, 2002 10:37 AM
I propose the following,
We update the website to be completely dynamic,
require login, make
Linux Rocks ! wrote:
maybe I should setup [EMAIL PROTECTED], but what would I use
as the full name?
Cute Little Devil.
--
Bob Miller Kbob
kbobsoft software consulting
http://kbobsoft.com [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Rob Hudson wrote:
Anyone notice a drastic slow down? It might not have been lately,
since I've been out of town, but all I'm getting these days are about
16 kBps. :(
Shortly after ATT bought out @Home, they installed bandwidth
caps on the cable modems. I think the cap is 1.5 Mb/sec down,
Jacob Meuser wrote:
On Thu, Jan 31, 2002 at 09:19:47AM -0800, Ben Barrett wrote:
In the original post, all that was wanted iirc was to host ports 21 and
80 over one interface (dsl?)
No, he wanted outbound port 21 80 traffic to go through the cable line
and everything else to go out the dsl
On 20020131.1447, Bob Miller said ...
Rob Hudson wrote:
Anyone notice a drastic slow down? It might not have been lately,
since I've been out of town, but all I'm getting these days are about
16 kBps. :(
Shortly after ATT bought out @Home, they installed bandwidth
caps on the
On Thu, Jan 31, 2002 at 12:46:59PM -0800, Cory Petkovsek wrote:
pinging google, google will be responding to the left ear(nic), but your
firewall will be listening to its right ear, meanwhile wondering what
this junk data is on it's left ear.
That's not really a problem... Unless you
I've lost the directions to the Clinic tonight. I'm bringing a friend
and 2 machines. Please help!
Woody
1400 Lake Dr. Eugene, OR
It's North by River Road, that's all I remember
On Thu, 31 Jan 2002, Woody Mims, wrote:
I've lost the directions to the Clinic tonight. I'm bringing a friend
and 2 machines. Please help!
Woody
http://www.efn.org/~laprice( Community, Cooperation,
On Thu, Jan 31, 2002 at 02:50:32PM -0800, Kahli R. Burke wrote:
You can use iptables to (PREROUTING) mark the packets in a way that
can be read later by the routing tools, for example:
snip example
Again, there are probably similar tools, like pf, on BSD. I just
don't know their
We've only bounced a few spams lately, about 3 in the last couple
of months, any objection to opening up the list to non-subscribers,
especially when we're getting outside interest?
--
Ed Craig [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Taxi (I need an income) GNU/Linux (I can afford a
RMS wrote:
It's not about purity in the abstract, it's about whether you spread
the confusion that hampers our work, or help correct it.
I agree with that 100%. Influential people like Bill G. say the GPL and
the GNU/Linux system is bad. Well, if you like what GNU stands for,
then why not
For any new users here a list of basic sites for linux news etc.
* www.osdn.com --Great site for the Open Source Developers
Network. (Currently owned and operated by VALinux)
* www.kcopensource.org --Emerging site for local (Kansas City)
Open Source Development projects.
* www.gnu.org -- Also
RMS replies...
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2002 20:38:12 -0700 (MST)
From: Richard Stallman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [EUG-LUG:1298] Re: flame wars and GNU/Linux
require login, make it
i have a dhcp-configured cable modem, a 5 port switch and two personal
computers. is there a way to have one computer be a gateway AND a desktop
system? i'm sorry, the dhcp thing confuses me (it's really hard to visualize a
firewall without static IP's...)
the setup would look like this :
24 matches
Mail list logo
