RMS wrote: > > It's not about purity in the abstract, it's about whether you spread > the confusion that hampers our work, or help correct it.
I agree with that 100%. Influential people like Bill G. say the GPL and the GNU/Linux system is bad. Well, if you like what GNU stands for, then why not tell people why Bill G. is full of it; why not say GNU any chance you get? And if someone gets so confused by three letters and a slash that they don't listen to you (which seems to be the ONLY reason so far against it [personally, I like the sound of G-N-U-Linux as compared to Linux; to me it sounds more professional and powerful, and, of couse, it's just as many syllables as Open-B-S-D ;]), then do you really think they're worth your time anyway? Be proud of your (OS's) heritage!! -- <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
