Linux Rocks ! wrote:
Or easier you could do:
xdpyinfo | grep XKEYBOARD
if it displays notthing, you dont have it[...]
Or else you mistyped XKEYBAORD! (-:
--
Bob Miller Kbob
kbobsoft software consulting
http://kbobsoft.com [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Friday 17 January 2003 10:05 am, Bob Miller wrote:
: Linux Rocks ! wrote:
: Or easier you could do:
: xdpyinfo | grep XKEYBOARD
: if it displays notthing, you dont have it[...]
:
: Or else you mistyped XKEYBAORD! (-:
Gee... thats why you copy/paste!
I figured youd send a line that had a
On Friday 17 January 2003 12:46 pm, Bob Miller wrote:
: Linux Rocks ! wrote:
: I figured youd send a line that had a condition statement, and displayed
: a message like, Yes, you have XKEYBAORD enabled or No, you dont have
: XKEYBAORD enabled
:
: Oh. Okay.
:
: xdpyinfo | grep -q XKEYBOARD
Ben,
Check the following directory: /etc/X11/xkb/types. Do you have a mousekeys
file?
G
-Original Message-
From: Ben Barrett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2003 5:55 PM
To: euglug
Subject: RE: [Eug-lug]Unusual num-pad behavior
No dice. Neither key
Yes [at work]... it looks like this:
// $Xorg: mousekeys,v 1.3 2000/08/17 19:54:48 cpqbld Exp $
//
partial default xkb_types default {
virtual_modifiers Alt;
type SHIFT+ALT {
modifiers = Shift+Alt;
map[Shift+Alt] = Level2;
level_name[Level1] = Base;
]]
Sent: Thursday, January 16, 2003 11:27 AM
To: euglug
Subject: RE: [Eug-lug]Unusual num-pad behavior
Yes [at work]... it looks like this:
// $Xorg: mousekeys,v 1.3 2000/08/17 19:54:48 cpqbld Exp $
//
partial default xkb_types default {
virtual_modifiers Alt;
type SHIFT+ALT
Humm... or it could be me!! Is anyone getting this to work through a
KVM? I wouldn't think it matters, but it might... I use one at home,
but it doesn't explain my office workstation. Maybe I'll try on some
other linux boxen here at the office, since they're numerous. = )
Is my odd situation
On 16 Jan 2003, Ben Barrett wrote:
Humm... or it could be me!! Is anyone getting this to work through a
KVM? I wouldn't think it matters, but it might... I use one at home,
but it doesn't explain my office workstation. Maybe I'll try on some
other linux boxen here at the office, since they're
Or easier you could do:
xdpyinfo | grep XKEYBOARD
if it displays notthing, you dont have it, if it displayss XKEYBOARD
you have it!
Jamie
On Thursday 16 January 2003 10:10 pm, Neil Parker wrote:
: On 16 Jan 2003, Ben Barrett wrote:
: Humm... or it could be me!! Is anyone getting this to work
My num-pad has decided to be a mouse today. I must have pressed
something that turned my num-pad keys into a mouse driver, which
(for example) makes the insertion point or arrow zoom up if I hold
my finger down on the eight, and down if I hold my finger down on
the two.
I want my regular
It is nice--or, it would be nice, if I knew how to turn it on and off.
Yes, the diagonal keys work as well, and acceleration works smoothly.
The 5 key works like a middle button paste command.
Just as mysteriously, though, I seem to have my regular num-pad back.
On 01/15/03 11am, Ben Barrett
Ralph,
You can turn this feature on and off by hitting CTRL-SHIFT-NUMLOCK. Works nice
when you don't have a mouse.
Garl
-Original Message-
From: Ralph Zeller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2003 11:27 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Eug-lug]Unusual
nice
when you don't have a mouse.
Garl
-Original Message-
From: Ralph Zeller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2003 11:27 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Eug-lug]Unusual num-pad behavior
It is nice--or, it would be nice, if I knew how to turn
Could it be that you hit num-lock?
Jamie
On Wednesday 15 January 2003 11:26 am, Ralph Zeller wrote:
: It is nice--or, it would be nice, if I knew how to turn it on and off.
: Yes, the diagonal keys work as well, and acceleration works smoothly.
: The 5 key works like a middle button paste
. Works nice
when you don't have a mouse.
Garl
-Original Message-
From: Ralph Zeller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2003 11:27 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Eug-lug]Unusual num-pad behavior
It is nice--or, it would be nice, if I knew how
Zeller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2003 11:27 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Eug-lug]Unusual num-pad behavior
It is nice--or, it would be nice, if I knew how to turn it on and off.
Yes, the diagonal keys work as well, and acceleration works smoothly
-Original Message-
From: Ben Barrett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2003 12:51 PM
To: euglug
Subject: RE: [Eug-lug]Unusual num-pad behavior
In KDE only?? I'm running Gnome/sawfish (also on RedHat) and
ctrl-shift-numlock doesn't seem to enable this feature for me
Ok, now I will include the link
http://www.tldp.org/HOWTO/Accessibility-HOWTO/index.html
-Original Message-
From: Grigsby, Garl
Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2003 1:17 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Eug-lug]Unusual num-pad behavior
Shouldn't be, it is part of the XFree86
:27 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Eug-lug]Unusual num-pad behavior
It is nice--or, it would be nice, if I knew how to turn it on and off.
Yes, the diagonal keys work as well, and acceleration works smoothly.
The 5 key works like a middle button paste command.
Just
can turn this feature on and off by hitting CTRL-SHIFT-NUMLOCK. Works nice
when you don't have a mouse.
Garl
-Original Message-
From: Ralph Zeller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2003 11:27 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Eug-lug]Unusual num-pad behavior
No dice. Neither key-combos work on my home workstation, either...
Is there a file where I might find out what's up?
Or three, more likely... ahh, precious linux, precocious linux.
benb
On Wed, 2003-01-15 at 15:13, Bob Crandell wrote:
Try Shift-Alt-NumLock.
Ben Barrett ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Ben Barrett wrote:
No dice. Neither key-combos work on my home workstation, either...
Is there a file where I might find out what's up?
Or three, more likely... ahh, precious linux, precocious linux.
I'm not getting it to work either.
I assumed it's because my X server is 4.1.0 (RedHat
What's your version of gnome? Mine is 1.4.0.8 and Sawfish is 1.0.1.
I didn't have to do any configuration. It did this out of the Slackware box.
Ben Barrett ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote*:
No dice. Neither key-combos work on my home workstation, either...
Is there a file where I might find out
Mine X server is 4.2.0, Slackware 8.1
Bob Miller ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote*:
Ben Barrett wrote:
No dice. Neither key-combos work on my home workstation, either...
Is there a file where I might find out what's up?
Or three, more likely... ahh, precious linux, precocious linux.
I'm not
No dice. Neither key-combos work on my home workstation, either...
Is there a file where I might find out what's up?
Or three, more likely... ahh, precious linux, precocious linux.
I'm not getting it to work either.
I assumed it's because my X server is 4.1.0 (RedHat 7.2).
Has anyone seen this
Gnome 1.4.1, Sawfish 1.0.1, and ... XFree86 4.1.0. poo.
(at home)
benb
On Wed, 2003-01-15 at 18:55, Bob Crandell wrote:
What's your version of gnome? Mine is 1.4.0.8 and Sawfish is 1.0.1.
Mine X server is 4.2.0, Slackware 8.1
Bob Miller ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote*:
Ben Barrett wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm not getting it to work either.
I assumed it's because my X server is 4.1.0 (RedHat 7.2).
Has anyone seen this work on a 4.1 X server?
I'm a big fat liar!
It works fine on my X server. I don't know what I was doing wrong
before, but CTRL-SHIFT-NumLock switches
Whimp.
Bob Miller ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote*:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't see myself abandoning the mouse anytime soon, though.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mailman.efn.org/cgi-bin/listinfo/eug-lug
___
Eug-LUG mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
28 matches
Mail list logo
