Re: [Eug-lug]Use perl to monitor webserver?

2002-12-14 Thread Jacob Meuser
On Fri, Dec 13, 2002 at 04:04:25PM -0800, Bob Miller wrote: I made small changes, because he was wanting to test for a timeout, not any ol' error. > #!/usr/bin/perl > > use strict; > use LWP::UserAgent; use HTTP::Status; > > sub check() { > my $ua = LWP

Re: [Eug-lug]Email

2002-12-14 Thread Jacob Meuser
On Sat, Dec 14, 2002 at 02:29:05AM +, Bob Crandell wrote: > Here is a snipet of log: > Dec 13 18:00:29 ocicat sendmail[12117]: gBE20Td12117: from=<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, > size=619, class=0, nrcpts=1, msgid=<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, > proto=ESMTP, daemon=MTA, relay=nobody@localhost [127.0.0.1] > Dec 13

[Eug-lug]Deleted?

2002-12-14 Thread Bob Crandell
Did I get deleted again? -- Bob Crandell Assured Computing When you need to be sure. Voice 541-689-9159 FAX 240-371-7237 [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.assuredcomp.com Eugene, Or. 97402 ___ Eug-LUG mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mailman.efn.org/cgi-bin

Re: [Eug-lug]Deleted?

2002-12-14 Thread Jacob Meuser
On Sat, Dec 14, 2002 at 06:30:34PM +, Bob Crandell wrote: > Did I get deleted again? Uh, I got the following. Might explain something. >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Dec 14 12:07:22 2002 Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from localhost ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [IPv6:::1]) by funk.g

[Eug-lug]Re: using a bridge....i think

2002-12-14 Thread Linux Rocks !
Doug, Hmm ok, I dont know if you can do this the way your describing, since most (if not all) AP's are a single radio network connected via ethernet to the primary network. It sounds like you want to create wireless repeaters basicly. Im not going to say its impossible... but Ill say

[Eug-lug]PCMCIA HAQUE needed!

2002-12-14 Thread Linux Rocks !
So, After abunch of wasted time trying to get my wireless working in linux, It apears that the problem is that these cards are 3.3v, and my laptops dont suport 3.3 (only 5). The cards work at 5V though... as Winbloze can use them just fine. It looks like the only way to get them to work under li

[Eug-lug]Dexter's dd block size speed test

2002-12-14 Thread Dexter Graphic
Purpose: I wanted to find out what effect changing the block size (bs=) option of the dd command would have on partition copy speeds. I also wanted to confirm that the default block size (if no bs option was specified) was indeed 512 bytes as someone had said. Procedure: 1.) I used dd to completel

Re: [Eug-lug]Deleted?

2002-12-14 Thread Linux Rocks !
Bob, Well.. if you mean removed from the eug-lug list Id say no, as this message came throug, and the list is only postable by subscribers... Jamie On Saturday 14 December 2002 10:30 am, Bob Crandell wrote: : Did I get deleted again? -- No microsoft products were used to produce t

Re: [Eug-lug]Use perl to monitor webserver?

2002-12-14 Thread Tim Howe
Thanks, this is something I can play with too. TimH On Sat, 14 Dec 2002 00:50:04 -0800 Jacob Meuser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, Dec 13, 2002 at 04:04:25PM -0800, Bob Miller wrote: > > I made small changes, because he was wanting to test for a timeout, > not any ol' error. > > > #!

Re: [Eug-lug]Deleted?

2002-12-14 Thread Bob Crandell
Jamie, It seems every time I play with my email settings you kick me off EUGLUG. Something about too many bounced messages I think. I was trying some of the things kBob suggested. As soon as I enabled the changes my mail stopped. Now it's back to the drawing board. Thanks Linux Rocks ! ([EMAI