With all the discussion about Tesla batteries, how do they attach all the
thousands of batteries together? Soldering, welding?
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
yahoo.com/group/NEDRA)
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/ms-tnef
Size: 4379 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<http://lists.evdl.org/private.cgi/ev-evdl.org/attachments/20170414/0a266df0/attachment.bin>
___
On 13 Apr 2017 at 22:04, Michael Ross via EV wrote:
> A cylinder only has to be oriented for polarity, it
> can have any radial orientation.
We had a rather similar discussion here many years ago (20?) about Optima
lead batteries, which used (and still use) cylindrical cells.
This thread has
ting-for-your-CAD-td4686393.html
A CAD46k's EV options ... (How much EV are you getting for your CAD?)
http://evdl.org/evln/
For all EVLN EV-newswire posts
{brucedp.neocities.org}
--
View this message in context:
http://electric-vehicle-discussion-list.413529.n4.nabble.com/EVLN-EV-newswire-p
Från: EV för Michael Ross via EV
Skickat: den 14 april 2017 04:04
Till: Electric Vehicle Discussion List; Mark Hanson
Ämne: Re: [EVDL] Tesla cell size
> Regarding fuses, if you check out some images of pack teardowns you can see
the fuses are
The larger cell allows more cooling surface. I think Tesla has optimized
for power density choosing the slightly larger size. Also optimized for
manufacturing efficiency. A cylinder only has to be oriented for polarity,
it can have any radial orientation.
Regarding fuses, if you check out some